Iceberg Slim: Portrait of a Pimp

Iceberg Slim: Portrait of a Pimp

'Iceberg Slim: Portrait of a Pimp', examines the tumultuous life of legendary Chicago pimp Iceberg Slim (1918-1992) and how he reinvented himself from pimp to author of 7 groundbreaking books. These books were the birth of Street Lit and explored the world of the ghetto in gritty and poetic detail and have made him a cultural icon. Interviews with Iceberg Slim, Chris Rock, Henry Rollins, Ice-T, Snoop Dogg, and Quincy Jones.

Examines the tumultuous life of legendary Chicago pimp Iceberg Slim (1918-1992) and how he reinvented himself from pimp to author of 7 groundbreaking books. These books were the birth of ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Iceberg.Slim.Portrait.of.a.Pimp.2012.720p.WEB-DL.H264-brento [PuWebDl38422.73 GB

Iceberg Slim: Portrait of a Pimp torrent reviews

WS W (es) wrote: Potential in premise but rather far-fetching.

Allen C (gb) wrote: One of the best thrillers I've seen in a long time. Very intense. You get claustrophobic just watch him going through this ordeal of being trapped inside the box and interrogated for information.

Vivian W (nl) wrote: a very heavy flix, watch it when you feel like working your ears real hard

Peter S (br) wrote: Kang's follow up to his cult-classic original takes a more ethical standpoint and the altering of the original formula results in a more serious piece that scrapes the surface of a more sinister underbelly in Korean society. As a film however it falls short, not the worst crime with many sequels made unable to outdo their predecessor. The typecast of the corporate bad guy is hard to bed down and the "promotion" of the main character Kang Chul Jung from hardline cop to prosecutor removes much of the essence that made the original what it was. This is a solid enough sequel but those fans of the original will definitiely miss the politically incorrect profanity filled script and not to mention the gratuitious violence. Kang's directorial style remains constant and the cameos from existing characters adds a nice jolt of flavour to this.

Omar A (de) wrote: Comedy cannot get any worse than this.

Jamie H (fr) wrote: Not as good as original

Michael A (ag) wrote: Two Sisters go on a mission to avenge their parents death..Been there done that.

Adrian M (kr) wrote: Ok film, some psycho girl funny moments that really tickled me. Not a great storyline but I didn't feel cheated watching it and it was pleasant enough.

Davey M (mx) wrote: It starts off with a bang (well, with a head-lopping, accompanied by zither), and ends in furious apocalyptic flames--and in between we get a lot of nastiness from Peter Cushing, who may well be the definitive cinematic Dr. Frankenstein. Still, the movie drags a bit between the memorable set pieces, and, while always smart and sophisticated, it's too rarely inspired. There are a handful of well-executed and memorable scenes, but, unfortunately, not enough of them to justify the running time.

JeanMarie L (nl) wrote: Dans le genre cinma politique et color, la mme poque, Godard a fait beaucoup mieux. C'tait il est vrai moins dlirant, mais aussi beaucoup moins chiant!

Orlok W (ca) wrote: Mitch Caught In The Tentacals Of A Dangerous Female--Entertaining but trite!!

Sue B (gb) wrote: Rex Harrison as a secret agent, and he even sings. Great fun.

Ian C (it) wrote: So many scumbag's in this. It felt like 'A Simple Plan' without the snow. It drags and is slow paced. Rockwell and William H. Macy are great but the ending is fairly wank.

Wesley V (fr) wrote: This movie does what it's supposed to. It entertains.

Waleed A (ru) wrote: I didn't give it a half star because it had some good directing, style, tone. But in reality I really hated this movie because it makes zero sense and is terrible. "everyone interprets it differently"-kind of BS. based entirely in symbolism and metaphors. (1 viewing)

Tristan G (ru) wrote: It's a piece of shit. Don't see it. Just trust me on this one.

Mayukh B (ca) wrote: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????