A selection of passengers catch the plane from London for an early 1950's weekend in Paris. The Scotsman in his kilt, the elderly lady painter, the international negotiator, and the pretty ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Innocents in Paris
Romantic comedy about a group of Britons flying to Paris for the weekend.
You may also like
Innocents in Paris torrent reviews
Brian P (nl) wrote: It's in the family's blood !
Hugo G (kr) wrote: The movie was actually boring and not interesting aside from a few things mostly towards the end, but aside from that Benedict Cumberbatch's performance was good but not enough to make the movie worth the while. ~August 7, 2015~
Konrad A (ru) wrote: Extremely hilarious outstanding movie movie!!! Will Aren't is great in this movie!!! He makes a very good comedian , and if you like Comedies it could be right for you!! When you see the movie go Nuts!! When I watch this movie I laugh all the time!! Kids will like this movie I bet!! I still watch this movie and laugh!! So go Nuts!!
Scott M (ag) wrote: was alright didnt expect it to be hollywood special. ali bastians in it so of course its an okay movie. loads blood and killings which good.
Stephen M (fr) wrote: Who could resist a film set in "an abandoned insane asylum known as Greystone Park"?
Daniel P (jp) wrote: Stupid, annoying, "knowingly" pretentious, but also playful, sexy, clever and sometimes moving. Bruce La Bruce's messy film has lofty intentions that it simply doesn't come close to achieving (it especially falls short in trying to use the persecution of gay zombies as a metaphor for homophobia). However, there are some game performances (Jey Crisfar, as Otto, is actually quite subdued but very watchable, whilst everyone else is campy or hammy), some interesting technical bits and pieces (including a mute character perpetually seen in scratchy black and white footage with inter-titles, for no apparent good reason other than to comment on how pretentious film can be), lots of laughs and some occasionally good, though overdone, doses of irony. The bleak false ending and the almost as bleak actual ending are striking, the gore flows, the sex is hot and/or disturbing (including one guy fucking his undead boyfriend through his chest cavity). Prudes and/or homophobes - i.e. anyone who doesn't want to see a cock in another man's mouth, even if in context - should not watch.
Peter D (fr) wrote: Pretty good. Some amazing cinematography!
Jacob B (de) wrote: 'Barton Fink' is a somewhat honest look at the struggles of writing a screenplay, even though the path it takes goes downhill. Nevertheless, it is filled with good performances by the cast.
David J (us) wrote: my favorite of the 'trilogy", this movie was totally beautiful, a beautiful score as well, the characters and events - which seem secondary to mood, visuals, motif and set pieces - all seem to repeat or some how fold in on themselves in a dream like way. Very good film.
Donald W (mx) wrote: This is a good World War II movie. It's set in 1944 France on the Siegfried Line. They did a good job of recreating the tank traps and pill boxes the Germans had built. In the story an infantry company is sent up to the line to break through after being told they were going home after a short period of Rest and Recreation. Their top Sergeant is played by Fess Parker. This was before the Daniel Boone TV show but after the Davy Crocket Disney shows. He plays a tough sergeant but with a little of Davy Crocket's charm. The star of the movie is Steve McQueen. This was right about the time he was becoming a big star. He plays a combat veteran who is suffering from post traumatic stress syndrome and had been demoted from Sergeant Major to private. It's implied that Fess Parker's character is an old friend who has pulled strings to get him assigned to his unit instead of being sent to prison. When this movie was made Viet Nam was not yet in the news and World War II vets were about the same age as the veterans of the First Iraq War are now. Many of the actors in this movie are too old to be playing World War II soldiers. The one exception is Bob Newhart who plays a comic role as a rear area office worker who gets lost and winds up on the front lines. This was his first movie and he's very young when this movie was made. In the movie when a small squad of soldiers wakes up in the morning they find that the rest of their company has moved to a different section of the front and they have been left behind. Fess Parker shows up and tells them that they were left to defend the gap in the line and reinforcements would arrive the next day. They can't let the Germans know that they are outnumbered. The rest of the movie is the story of the strategies they used to fool the Germans for the next 24 hours. The movie is a good tribute to the World War II Vets without the rah-rah for our side dialog from war movies from the 1940's and early 1950's. I first saw this movie on TV when I was a teenager. At the time I was a big Daniel Boone and Fess Parker fan.
Richard B (ag) wrote: Entertaining. Great performance by Mr. Cagney. Great music.
Jonathan R (us) wrote: Supposedly a bit of a classic, but it was pretty rubbish...not a bad story, but it's dated really badly...lots of blood and a mutant version of Morph...
Andrew L (mx) wrote: The film blatantly, without shame, shows us how Christmas is all about materialism now and without any sense of turning into a film that really does have a message or having three-dimensional characters and a bad climax. Some of the acting is horrid and the jokes seem so forced. But with all that negativity I just spouted, I kind of like the film. Again its so bad, yet so hilarious at the same time. Its a Christmas classic in my book.
FilmGrinder S (kr) wrote: 78% Learn the ways, my son.
Jessica S (es) wrote: Angelina Jolie took a strong female lead in the search to find a long-time serial killer. Despite a few slow moments, this movie held my interest the entire time. It kept me on the edge of my seat with a few screaming moments here and there. The ending was my favorite part and was highly unexpected.I might add that it's been a while since I have seen this, hence my lack of wordiness. Sorry :(
Favian G (au) wrote: Better than most prequels I've seen.
David G (kr) wrote: Foreign film, but pretty good.