Jawan of Vellimala

Jawan of Vellimala

The story of Jawan of Vellimala revolves around a high-range village called Vellimala , a dam in this village and the people living there. The villagers of Vellimala consider the dam as a sign of their pride. Gopi Krishan (Mammootty), the central character, who took voluntary retirement from military service, reaches Vellimala as a labourer. Varghese is a government employee at the Dam site and Koshi Oommen, another character reaches there for some personal need. These three play the main three male characters in the film. Mamta Mohandas plays the role of a project officer at the Dam site and she also works for the development of the society. The story reveals the incidents happening when these characters and the villagers meet together.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:0 minutes
  • Release:2012
  • Language:Malayalam
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:Jawan of Vellimala 2012 full movies, Jawan of Vellimala torrents movie

Jawan Of Vellimala is a story about a dam situated in a poor village called 'Vellimala'.When the dam was decided to build the government comes against it. So the people of Vellimala starts ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Jawan of Vellimala torrent reviews

Chris S (ca) wrote: It's not a perfect movie, but it's a fun little romp. The songs are pretty catchy and Elliot is a lovable character.

Ira R (ru) wrote: Boring as boring gets...a character study of post industrial America and its failing poor towns and the dregs of society that lurk within, including the talent that "entertains" them. If you want to waste two hours of your time, watch it. Overall, this is a pointless and not very deep movie, there's basically no story, just the main character's waste of existence, which we get in 15 minutes, we should have been spared the rest.

Matt H (de) wrote: So I liked this movie but I didnt. I thought the cast was great and the story was good. The part i didnt like was I didnt understand it. I dont understand the stock market and all that jazz and I feel that I know nothing more from watching this movie except that these big CEOs play on percentages and dont really give to licks about anyone but themselves.

Vivian E (mx) wrote: Me suis ennuye a mourir. Plus feministe c'est difficile...

cindy s (it) wrote: Add a review (optional)...

Nolanbrams R (it) wrote: Stargate: The Ark of Truth is one and a half hour of great adventure and innovative action sequences that truly defines the series.The movie starts where the series ended. We see the continuous threat of the Ori and SG-1: s attempts to stop them. The opening scene is great, unique and classic SG-1. The movie is overall very similar with the series and its positive aspects. Those are great action, fine CGI and some scenes of epicenes. The Ori is at the same time an awesome enemy, very similar with the Goa'uld. There's a lot going on at the same time and the action is as I said, awesome! The plot is great, but it got some weird plot-holes. Some of those are connected with some of the rules in the Stargate Universe (not the show ;)). They made the movie great, but forgot to think about the basic rules of the movie. The CGI is as I previously mentioned great, but it's a bit vague at some places. It's the same with the dialogs. This is an aspect both SG-1 and Atlantis is bad at. The dialogs are focused on us, the audience. When they try to explain thing they do it in a way that sounds too forced. It's so obvious sometimes. But the movie is still awesome. The actors are flawless, especially Michael Shanks, he was surprisingly great in this movie! The soundtrack is also as great as it should be. This is a great follow-up to the series, even if the ending could have been better.Overall is this a great movie. But the dialogs are the biggest flaw. The focus lies on the action, rather than on the plot, could have been better. It might also have been a bit bigger, more epic! But it's still an awesome continuation of the Stargate saga!8.8/10

THE WALKIN DEAD (br) wrote: luv watchin queer duck its funny n so wrong but my fav

Luciana R (jp) wrote: to know more about the wotld beyond football

RajanSatish P (au) wrote: A brilliant legal thriller with some of the finest actors Gene Hackman,Dustin Hoffman,Rachel Weisz,in it. One other reason I love the movies that are decade older , they hold your grip and attention.

Camilo d (ru) wrote: Precursora de Tony Manero y tantas otras, es el arte de hacer una pelcula que no trata de nada y trata de todo. Impresionantes reflejos en las familias de todos..... slo nos falta el clima pegajoso.

Linda H (de) wrote: This was a great movie, especially to see with Lily!

Steve W (us) wrote: This suspense thriller is every bit as good as James Patterson's fine novel and has great chemistry between Morgan Freeman and Ashley Judd. The sole plot is Freeman's search for two serial kidnappers and killers who snatch beautiful and accomplished young women, including Freeman's niece. The two killers try to outdo each other as they seize and destroy their trophy captives. As with most mysteries, this one has the usual red herrings, false leads and dead ends. Freeman is excellent as Alex Cross and heroine Judd is a study in grit and survival and is very effective in a finely nuanced role. The supporting cast is also great in a movie that has a leisurely pace and several great action scenes as it peaks towards its conclusion. The North Carolina location, music score and cinematography are all very good.

RiP M (jp) wrote: A "lesser" Forster novel makes for one of its most powerful and absorbing. Early 20th century exploration of sexuality amongst the repressed.

Grant S (br) wrote: Ok, ish, but ultimately disappointing. First half was good - intriguing, stylish, perfectly paced. Second half degenerated into your average convoluted twist-a-minute thriller. A tighter plot towards the end would have made this a pretty good movie.Solid performances from Jeff Bridges, James Woods and the beautiful Rachel Ward.

Lars P (br) wrote: A masterpiece ! One of the best war-movies made. Over 30 year old, but lost nothing of its impact and beats many war-movies made in more recent years. Answers what is not worth dying for: Blood and honour for any regime.

W W (br) wrote: I had high expectations for this film after reading the book. Lost, meandering and incoherent is all I can say for this film.

Senor C (jp) wrote: Bronson has to protect Jill Ireland the President's wife. It is a thankless job because she is a bit of a bitch but Bronson handles it like a pro. After an assassination attempt is made on her life they are on the run while Charlie must figure out who the culprit is. After about Death Wish 3 Bronson's films were a little weaker but all in all this isn't bad. Maybe if it didn't have the PG-13 rating it might have been better. I like him better as a mean selfish son of a bitch who guns them down w/ no remorse. Here he is reaching the twilight of his box office draw but he is pretty stealth @ 66. Always a fan liked this movie more because it had Bronson in it. If someone else was cast I probably wouldn't be as forgiving

Sean W (gb) wrote: Great cast, great production design, terrible movie.

Jeff S (es) wrote: Another waste of a great cast, just an excuse to get them all in the same movie

House M (ca) wrote: No a great movie, no great plot, just a consisting performance of Bale to keep the story going. Not a must see.