Kalyanji Anandji

Kalyanji Anandji

Kalyana Krishnan (Mukesh) is part of an orthodox Brahmin family who still follow the caste system. He ends up marrying Nirmala (Annie), a Christian girl. To get the family's approval for the marriage, Nirmala masquerades as a Brahmin orphan. The film continues with the tricks & travails that they have to face owing to this.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:0 minutes
  • Release:1995
  • Language:Malayalam
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:Kalyanji Anandji 1995 full movies, Kalyanji Anandji torrents movie

. You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Kalyanji Anandji torrent reviews

Mandy C (br) wrote: Wilson Yip and Raymond Wong should take the script in the movie seriously. When the movie tries to potray "Whatever is the past, is the past and will remain as memories, we can never change what has happened in the past". Yes, hence trying to re-work and bring Happy Ghost formula back to life just isn't working fine.As a strong fans of Happy Ghost, I am quite disappointed in this. The start of the movie was promising and entertaining, but towards second half of the movie, it was pure disappointment and boring. For those who root for their good looking idol, be it Louis Koo, Wu Chun or Wu Jing, you will definately fall in love with the movie as they look ever so good.The movie dragged on too long and there are many parts of the movie which couldn't piece up together, as example to the elements of the movie, why Louis Koo only give the rock to Wu Chun and the whole idea of returning to the past. Not to mention how some of the cast were really left in the dark and unexplored. Frankly speaking, I believe this movie could actually stand on its own and would make a great one should it not try too hard to slip in the Happy Ghost elements as I think it seriously got the audiences expecting for more.As how most of the HK movie receive the same destined death by using too much CGI, Magic to Win is no different. The movie massive use of CG was simply disturbing and fake. Which to date, I still couldn't understand how CG which was initially introduced was to help enhance a movie could do so much damage to the movie once overly used, yet no one really cares. And what's worst in this movie was the reference to Star Wars and the lightsaber fight scene which I personally felt was irrelevant and tastelessly done.At the end of the day, I guess the saving grace for the movie boils down to a job well done by Karena Ng since this is her first apperances in the film industry as well as a great job in getting all the good looking main actors in the movie. Yes yes, I know, nothing magical but at least something that soothes the eyes.

Frances Ann A (ru) wrote: Very well-made film with an excellent musical score, tastefully directed, but failed to hold my interest due to a somewhat dull plot and three distasteful characters. A lot of time passes while you just watch Viggo smoke one cigarette after another. Ugh! What is it with the entertainment industry? Are they deliberately trying to encourage young people to smoke?!!! Pet peeve of mine!

Chris K (gb) wrote: As a group of 'weather-underground' extremists long life on the run from the law begins to unfold, we start to hear a collection of mysterious, spaced out and ambiguous stories that are supposed to generate intrigue and interest, but don't do a thing. A slew of A-list actors or previously A-list actors like Robert Redford, Julie Christie, Susan Sarandon, Nick Nolte, Chris Cooper, Terence Howard, Stanley Tucci, Anna Kendrick and Sam Elliott flocked to this film for some reason, but what that was is the biggest mystery of the film. The pacing is droll and slow. That is hands down the biggest problem of the film. I won't even go into the suspension of belief ages of some of the actors. Forty-five minutes into the film and I could care less about any of the over-acting and over-dramatizations. A scene in a truck between Nick Nolte and Redford was reminiscent of a scene from "JFK" as the character begins to remember and tell what they know about the past and it just felt trumped up and overdone. They wanted you to listen and observe with awe, but it just didn't work. That scene is a fair assessment of the entire film. As much as they want you to care, it is just plain hard to. I don't know if its the pacing of the film or the obviously over-zealous attempt to make you care, but regardless, I didn't.

Scott S (us) wrote: It was a pretty good fantasty movie. There were a couple parts that were really fake. But overall really great movie.

Aisha R (br) wrote: i thought this move was so cute! Hrithik Roshan does a good job at playing the sensitive romantic type. Esha Deol was sorta ditzy but was alright. I wasnt too impressed with Saif's performance...i still love this movie, its on my top 10 favs

Lady D (es) wrote: Bought but not yet watched

Adam R (au) wrote: I was expecting better. There are a few amusing moments, but it's far from memorable. (First and only viewing - 9/19/2014)

Justin B (gb) wrote: The total lack of any kind of atmosphere in any way shape or form was a bit much but it wasn't awful. Shameless albeit entertaining Alien knockoff.

Christian C (br) wrote: Well done, but Barbara is a bit hammy. Pleasant (although often unmemorable) songs. And again -- doesn't Mandy Patinkin play the pan flute for a living nowadays?!

Luis Rafael D (es) wrote: tal vez no sea la mejor de passolini, pero hace analizar muchas aspectos de la sociedad...

Gary C (mx) wrote: This story of prisoners of war in a WWII japanese prison camp is based on true experiences, and is far more concerned with the harsh realities of surviving the terrible hardships of day to day life than derring do and cunning escape plans. George Segal plays a cynical hustler who seems far more adept at making the best of his predicament, and as such the other prisoners either ally themselves with or despise him. James Fox is excellent as the british officer who befriends him and humour and drama unfolds as the camps differing factions motives and hypocrisies are exposed. Best described as a cross between The Bridge On The River Kwai and Stalag 17, it is not quite their measure, but it's a damn good film in it's own right.

Sofia B (br) wrote: This film reallly lacks all imagination which makes it predictable from the very beginning, but oh well, it could have been worse.

Leonardo Malacay S (gb) wrote: Una de esas pelculas para un domingo en la tarde, nada es sobresaliente pro puede resultar entretenida aunque muy tonta