Kermit's Swamp Years

Kermit's Swamp Years

At 12 years old, Kermit the Frog and best friends Goggles and Croaker travel outside their homes in the swamps of the Deep South to do something extraordinary with their lives.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:82 minutes
  • Release:2002
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:swamp,   frog,   pet shop,  

At 12 years old, Kermit the Frog and best friends Goggles and Croaker travel outside their homes in the swamps of the Deep South to do something extraordinary with their lives. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Kermit's Swamp Years torrent reviews

Rudy G (ca) wrote: Bloody and awesome! Didn't really get the ending thought?

Leon B (fr) wrote: Review:I really didn't have a clue about the plot in this movie but the action scenes are top class. The acting was a bit shaky in places and I did find the girl who joined the group, quite irritating, especially when she wouldn't stop screaming in the jungle. Anyway, the movie is basically about a rich man who hires Jackie Chan to retrieve 12 Chinese Zodiac animal heads which were stolen in the 1800's. After following all the clues, he ends up in France with his reliable team but the mission isn't as straight forward as they first thought. That's the bit of the plot that I did understand but when the other business men get involved, I got completely lost. Jackie Chans comedic acting wasn't bad because it was mixed up with some clever stunts but it was a bit silly in parts. Its basically a National Treasure meets Indiana Jones type movie which obviously went down well with audiences around the world, judging by the box office takings. Personally, the film did get on my nerves after a while because it jumped from one situation to another. With that aside, you can't fault the action in the movie which has proved that Jackie Chan has still got the ability to entertain audiences with his amazing Kung Fu skills. Watchable but quite confusing!Round-Up:At 61 years old, Jackie Chan is still coming out with top action movies, whilst doing most of the stunts himself, so he has definitely has made his mark in the Kung Fu entertainment world. They cleverly mixed the languages with English and Chinese so you don't have to concentrate on annoying subtitles. I'm sure they dubbed the movie for other countries because it's quite a big budget film. Anyway, I personally preferred Chan in the Drunken Master authentic days, before he decided to concentrate on his comedic movies but he still has an audience which flock to see his movies. This film was actually directed by Jackie Chan so it must have been hard to play the lead and do all of the stunts at the same time. He definitely can't complain about the profit that the movie made and I'm sure that they will come out with another part of this Armour of God series which started in 1986. Anyway, it's worth a watch just for the action and the funny Pirates that tackled them in the woods but the storyline is a bit sketchy.Budget: $26millionWorldwide Gross: $145millionI recommend this movie to people who are into their action/adventure movies about a man who searches the world for 12 Chinese Zodiac artifacts which are worth a large amount of money. 4/10

Carleton W (it) wrote: Robert Duvall and Bill Murray were fantastic. A wonderful strory

Adam R (ru) wrote: Very good animation based more on the original comic than the video game. Make sure you watch the extras to learn more about the history and how the character has evolved over time. I found it interesting that Turok was one of the first comics to combine Indians and Dinosaurs, two things that all little boys love to learn about.

Dustin C (ag) wrote: Horrible. Preachy and up it's own ass. Acting and dialogue is just awful. Touched by and Angel meets the passing, stale wind of 4400.

Maxime G (es) wrote: A much disappointing comedy that begins with an innovative Hong-Kong cinema pastiche, just to end up a predictable cross-ethnical happy love story.Many distinctive signs, such as religious ones, were carefully wiped out, whereas other harmless ones, such as food, were emphasized without restraint.In the end, I had the feeling this movie had completely missed the point. To much good intentions, I guess...

Greg W (gb) wrote: hmm flixter another kept the rating lost the review!

Jon P (kr) wrote: I'm gonna go ahead and say that this one edges out even Scorsese's Last Waltz as the best concert movie ever made.

Jennifer C (au) wrote: This was a little known British film that my Uncle TR brought to our house one day, and became a favorite among my very British family. "There is a pig in the house!" "I thought it was me!" "She's going to think she's going bananas!" "What's all this talk about bananas? I could eat a banana!" Come to think of it, the old lady was an awful lot my like great grandmother!

Maddie D (de) wrote: Ok. Not the best movie.

Ted S (ag) wrote: This movie is worth re-watching every few years. It is long and has no adventure or action but it is the characters that draw you in. Even the music stays with you long after the movie is over. You care about these characters. You hope that she will pass is the Duchess, you love that Col. Pickering cares about everybody, and you long to see a change in Prof. Higgins. I wish the ending was a little more clear but you forgive that easily because of how good this movie is. Sit down and enjoy the show.

Christopher K (ru) wrote: One of the great classics and yet I'd never heard of it. I've been bothered for a long time by how AFI and other pretentious hollywood organizations rate films. Some of the "Classics" really are great, but only the really boring ones seem to get promoted. Citizen Kane is the best film of all time? I don't think so. Meet John Doe, now THIS is a Classic. In fact, just about anything by Capra is phenomenal. Hollywood, stop promoting the rubbish and start promoting stuff that people might actually like.

Orlok W (gb) wrote: Poor, cheap exploitation tat--Turdistas!!