Khubsoorat

Khubsoorat

Nirmala Gupta runs her household and family in a very strict and authoritarian manner. While most of her family resents this, they do obey her and carry out her instructions, so as to be on her good side. Things start to change after her second son gets married to Anju. Manju, Anju's sister, comes over to stay for a few days with the Gupta family, and is accepted by everyone except Nirmala. Nirmala's third son intends to marry Manju. But Manju does not like the manner in which his mom bosses everyone, and feels some changes are needed in the Gupta household

Nirmala Gupta runs her household and family in a very strick and authoritarian manner. While most of her family resent this, they do obey her and carry out her instructions, so as to be on ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Khubsoorat torrent reviews

Freya L (it) wrote: love it can't wait to watch it~

Angelo Dean B (gb) wrote: I have to agree with all the Rotten Reviews here. Just simply boring and not good.

Scott M (fr) wrote: Heavy. Nobody's perfect.

Robyn K (gb) wrote: If you liked Best in Show you're going to LOVE this! The best part is this stuff is real. You won't believe how into the competition these people get and the rivalry and drama that unfolds. A great laugh, very entertaining and as a bonus - a great story about special dogs getting loving homes.

Li K (gb) wrote: Fucking zombies. Why do people make me watch Zombie movies? I hate zombies. Even more especially these goddamn modern zombies. Boring movie with a bunch of unwashed ugly actors, no character development, overused cinematic techniques, relying on the shock value of watching kids eat out peoples intestines. The "twist" ending other people have referred to wasn't a twist. This movie was unmotivated and shouldn't have been made. I also have a big issue with eyes. The movie did not benefit by stabbig glass through an eye. Gross.

Jennifer R (fr) wrote: it was as disturbing as i thought it was gonna be. The ending was way lame and never really came to a conclusion.

Grant S (de) wrote: Powerful Cold War drama.It is the height of the Cold War and the US President, Jordan Lyman (played by Fredric March) has negotiated a nuclear arms limitation treaty with the Russians. The military and some politicians are not happy with this, figuring the Russians will renege on the deal, leaving the US vulnerable. Foremost among the opponents of the treaty is General James Scott (played by Burt Lancaster), Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. On his staff is a Marine Colonel, "Jiggs" Casey (played by Kirk Douglas), who starts to suspect that the General may be planning a coup...Intriguing, entertaining drama. Mostly plausible, though there is some looseness in the plot. In addition, it demonstrates well the link between politics and the military, and who, in a democratic society, takes orders from whom.Solid performances all round. Edmond O'Brien was nominated for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar for playing the drunken-but-resourceful Senator Clark.

Brendan N (au) wrote: Great animated film that has a distinct tone that might not suit everybody. The characters are strong and the direction is faultless. The film takes an interesting turn around the midway point that is typical of the author. I can't recommend this highly enough.

Kerby H (jp) wrote: This movie isn't perfect but it put me on an emotional roller coaster unlike anything I've ever felt. The script is fantastic, the acting is phenomenal, and the sheer heart of this movie is beautifully unique. I'll definitely be watching this one again.

Howard E (ca) wrote: Stop me, oh, oh-o, stop meStop me if you thinkThat you've heard this one beforeThe SmithsIf you think that you've heard, or seen, Woody Allen's latest film, IRRATIONAL MAN, before, you're not alone. It has elements from a few of his previous outings including his 1989 film, CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, and his 2005 effort, MATCH POINT. But when you've made as many films as he has, you do get a bit of leeway in Hollywood when it comes to being repetitive.The film shares its title with a 1958 book by New York University philosophy professor William Barrett, which examined existential philosophy in the 20th century. In the book, a number of existential thinkers, such as Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Sartre, are discussed, providing a primary overview of their thoughts on the subject. Like the book, the movie flirts with these notables, bandying about the nuances of their philosophies, as many of Woody Allen's films do.The story centers around philosophy professor, Abe Lucas (Joaquin Phoenix, HER), who comes to Braylin College in sunny New England to teach a summer class. The advance gossip on Lucas is positive, if not exactly flattering. The professor has a reputation for both his insightful teaching and his extra-curricular activities that usually involve young female students. In many places, the latter trait might raise a few eyebrows; at Braylin, it seems to be an attractive quality. It is, at any rate, attractive to both a married colleague, Rita Richards (Parker Posey), and to one of his students, Jill Pollard (Emma Stone, BIRDMAN).One day, while eating lunch at a local diner, Abe and Jill overhear a conversation involving a custody battle and a family court judge who shows bias against women. Abe is bothered by the apparent injustice and, without telling Jill, decides to help the woman by murdering the judge. As he doesn't have an identifiable motive to commit the crime, he feels that he won't be suspected. (I guess he never saw Alfred Hitchcock's 1951 film, STRANGER ON A TRAIN.) Through a series of events, Abe does kill the judge and he finds the existential episode rather liberating. Abe had been in a funk of late, drinking throughout the day, not being able to complete his book, and not having mojo in the bedroom. But with the murder, it all comes flowing back. Unfortunately for Abe though, Jill has a razor sharp, analytical mind and she works out that he is the killer.The parallels to Allen's own life are all too obvious - the custody battle, the older man/younger woman relationship, searching for meaning in one's life, jazz music, ... Unfortunately, the story isn't able to gather enough steam to take us to a place we've never been before with Allen. He has already dealt with the subjects of the perfect murder and finding meaning in previous films, and he's done them better. But leaving all that aside, the big problem with IRRATIONAL MAN is that it can't decide if it is a comedy or a drama. There aren't a lot of laughs in the film and, when the story does get bogged down in existential monologues, the director tries to lighten the mood with a few bars from Ramsey Lewis' 2013 upbeat take on the 1965 jazz classic, "The 'In' Crowd". By the time the film ends, we've heard the tune at least a dozen times. On the plus side, the acting is solid from both Phoenix and Stone. Even Posey isn't bad, although we've seen her do better work in some of Christopher Guest's mockumentaries including WAITING FOR GUFFMAN, BEST IN SHOW and FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. (All of these are highly recommended viewing.)As far as Woody Allen films go, this is not one of his best nor is it one of his worst. It's right there in the middle. Fortunately for his fans (and I count myself among them), he is currently working on his 47th film, which will be released in 2016. We wait, hoping for something better than this film.