Koko and the Ghosts

Koko and the Ghosts

Young Koko has just moved with his parents from his idyllic countryside home to a big city. There, with the help of his new friends and a neighbour he investigates the mysterious case of a dead old man who used to live in the flat he has just moved into. Koko and the Ghosts is a family film based on a popular Croatian series of young-adult novels written by Ivan Kušan.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:90 minutes
  • Release:2011
  • Language:Croatian
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:based on novel,  

Young Koko has just moved with his parents from his idyllic countryside home to a big city. There, with the help of his new friends and a neighbour he investigates the mysterious case of a dead old man who used to live in the flat he has just moved into. Koko and the Ghosts is a family film based on a popular Croatian series of young-adult novels written by Ivan Kušan. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Koko and the Ghosts torrent reviews

Tim M (fr) wrote: A look inside a man who had been humbled after his termination at Apple. Jobs comes across as a likable genius who at the time of the interview was working at a relatively new startup. We don't learn much about Jobs the man but we get his perspective in a fairly raw dialogue where he wasn't protecting the giant Apple. Jobs is clearly an innovator as in 1995 he foresaw how important the WWW would be. Jobs best vision was to be able to look a decade into the future and determine what people would want.

Dominique F (us) wrote: Un divertissement vraiment lger. Plusieurs moments touchants, plusieurs moments amusants. Plusieurs rfrences la culture populaire des annes 80 et quelques squences mettant en vedette nos joyeux nazis. Un film que je recommande tous. Vous aurez un sourire coll au visage pour plusieurs heures aprs le visionnement de ce film.

Ice R (au) wrote: Could a movie be more cheesy?

Megan B (fr) wrote: This story is disturbing on so many levels. A little long, but a good documentary.

Aladia F (ag) wrote: Diverse and well rounded characters with a great story. There's so much creative genius backing it

Jake P (ag) wrote: Even thought very cliched I thought this movie was surprisingly great. It featured believable performances and it kept me wanting to see what was going to happen throughout. Also I think Robert Ri'chard gives a breakthrough performance here.

Joseph M (it) wrote: I remember thinking "Oh my god, Marty's a dog!"

Maximilien D (kr) wrote: Interesting take on the dystopian genre, it is important to remember this movie as a precursor to the genre and judge it accordingly as a movie that takes risks despite the ending being easy to figure out. Solid, almost timeless classic for anybody tired of movies based on CGI of flying space ship battles.

Michael J (fr) wrote: There are a lot of characters introduced through out this movie and at times they appear to have no relevance. In reality these characters are all entwined with each other. I found that each character portrayed the Russian environment perfectly; you can almost imaging the revolution and the damage it caused to people. I have to mention the sets. They are incredible for the time. Mars is very futuristic looking and really comes across as being somewhere different. I was thoroughly impressed with the sets. This is an excellent movie and a visual masterpiece.

Brendan C (au) wrote: May have been the worst movie I've ever seen. It was so stupid. Cameron Diaz is really annoying. My uncle dragged me to see this and I really resented him for it. It was so bad that I felt uncomfortable watching it. We were shocked by how much this sucked. Everything was either dumb, annoying, or just plain stupid. Cameron Diaz may be the worst actress of all time.

Peter F (br) wrote: A decent crime thriller that's smart screenplay and old-timey aesthetic make up for dated film making, and a somewhat irritating performance from Eric Roberts.

Manolo P (us) wrote: The egocentric and reprehensible proposal of Woody Allen uses the very debatable positions between destiny, luck and effort, creating a tense and often repetitive drama whose central axis is the capacity of the human being to decide between our passions or the reason, where anxiety and obsession desperately cloud thought. The narrative is fluid, but predictable, and Allen's mental games are not fully consolidated to make this a sufficiently provocative and acceptably graceful story. Filled with devoid acts, the cast is rather irritating and uncool, only Johansson has a job that is more than fantastic, and although the screenplay and photography are worthy of admiration, this attempt to unite opera and drama, as well as the comments that are usually cited to produce a poetic effect and sustain the work, point to a rather artificial and discursively unfinished result. 62/100