L'insegnante di violoncello

L'insegnante di violoncello

Leo is a street vendor who, always accompanied by his dog Cagliostro, he entertains shoppers on the beach telling stories more or less agreeable to a group of guys who are really too busy to look for adventures chasing the tourists. Meanwhile Mario, a boy on vacation with his father, falls in love with his beautiful cello teacher but this, of course, prefers the father.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:0 minutes
  • Release:1989
  • Language:Italian
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:female nudity,   thong,  

. You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

L'insegnante di violoncello torrent reviews

Weng S (nl) wrote: ,? 1/4-

Amatul S (nl) wrote: "A worthy portrait of a phenomenal woman" - John Anderson, Variety

Kevin B (br) wrote: Having not seen any previous "Behind Enemy Lines" films, i feel i'll benefit from a non expectant view on this one, which at an overall look, isnt all that great. I never got into the film, i dont know why. There were shooting scenes, knife scenes, set peices galore... but something felt missing. There werent any memorable moments regardless how much action there seemed to be. Some scenes seemed a tad far fetched and others left many questions. One that irritated me alot was considering the Navy's were their priority at the time, then why didn't the Columbians send more than a handful of soldiers? But i spose you'll have that kind of question in most films like this... It just stood out alot. Its a highly average film, good for a casual watch, but it wont blow you away.

James H (us) wrote: Bronson is not an easy film to watch. The average film goer will not be able to stomach this. Tom Hardy meets the psychotic levels needed to play Charles Bronson, he does not hold back. Nicholas Winding Refn does not either, there are some incredibly gruesome scenes. The score is brilliant but it doesn't look as good as most of Refn's other films. There was also no word on his wife and son after he was sent to prison.

Shams M (es) wrote: I could nt belive it .. it does nt look real

Well A (nl) wrote: Uma perda de tempo sem tamanho.

Ryan A (de) wrote: What I got to say about "54" is that it's a terrible movie from beginning to the end. "It's boring and very dull of a movie." The performances by the cast is horrendous. The directing and screenplay by Mark Christopher is incredibly poor. The big problem hands down is the writing. "There isn't any plot development and no character development whatsoever. - Big Problem!" The cinematography and choreography could be much better. The score is bad. Finally, the effects are not the best either "I have to report that "54" is a total disaster of a movie and it's not a must see."

Matthew M (br) wrote: A must for David Bradley fans not the one on facebook but the real one who is best known for American Ninja Series. It is not that bad at all its quite entertaining even though some of the actors are atrocious and the movies ends on a sour note with no real clear reason why the main character switches from David Bradley to the other girl with a random voice over narration. The action scenes are plenty and David Bradley owns some cops. One of Bradley's best and higher budget movies.

Marilee A (es) wrote: My Friend Rose, A.K.A. shoodabin recommends this

Scott A (ag) wrote: A little better than the first but still pretty stupid.

DibbHansen D (br) wrote: Creative and imaginative and a it also shows a bit more on the adult side of a cartoon, which also makes it hilarious.

Armand P (gb) wrote: Yes it's corny, formulaic, over-dramatic, and makes about as much as sense as hiring a worm guy to fight a huge radiation monster. It's also lots of fun.

Gordon R (es) wrote: Two dimwits kidnap a pizza delivery guy and force him to rob a bank in this dimwitted comedy.

Apoach C (nl) wrote: what's wrong with this movie?!! I was a pretty good action-packed film! 8.5/10

Yash B (it) wrote: An important story that everyone has probably read. One of the best well adapted movies you'll ever see. Doesn't quite capture the same effect the novel has, but it gets pretty close.

Alec B (au) wrote: A potentially fun concept that's crippled by poor pacing . . . Levinson never really gets the tone right and I think the movie could stand to lose about 20 minutes.