La guerre de pacification en Amazonie

La guerre de pacification en Amazonie

This document is the final chapter of the history of Brazil's Amerindian tribes caught up in the trap of modernization. The Parakana Indians undergo the first contact which begins the process of their pacification. They are attracted by presents laid out in the forest, then settled around camps. They are then confined to indigenous reservations before being completely assimilated by our conquering civilization. All such pacification is initiated through strategic or economic pretexts. The Amerindian civilizations of the Brazilian Amazon are either dying or definitely defunct.

This document is the final chapter of the history of Brazil's Amerindian tribes caught up in the trap of modernization. The Parakana Indians undergo the first contact which begins the ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

La guerre de pacification en Amazonie torrent reviews

Eric H (au) wrote: When I started to seeing the movie I thought: OK, this is all a joke, all this futuristic stuff is just a joke. All that weird suits and colorful streets are the result of analyzing the old dystopian movies, or just old futuristic movies, and seeing how wrong we are to imagine the future, the future technologies and the future use of them (the clothes are the clearest example). A parody, that's what I thought. In that sense, I really enjoy the first half of the movie. But, even if I was right about the movie, it's just too long. All the little ridiculous details start to appear less and less as the movie progress and the movie become just boring. If you wanna see this movie as a good dystopic movie, you are going to be disappointed, it's just too silly. I suggest to see this movie as I think it is, a parody movie, a long but good dystopic parody movie.

Rachel S (fr) wrote: loved it .. IDK what anyone says it is a must see..

Tayo O (us) wrote: For some reason I always expect Michael Keaton to be in a comedy. Here he played a serious role - heartless diamond thief. He pulled it off well to his credit and the rest of the movie too was good enough to watch, nothing great here. Perhaps I am become heartless too for I found the scene where Chad got shot thoroughly comical.

bill s (br) wrote: Easy watch with some tough realities and makes you appreciate what we have in this not so little world.

Kenny N (fr) wrote: No stars. Once upon a time, Dane Cook ruled the comedy world. He was the Andrew Dice Clay of the MySpace generation-successful yet controversial. Unlike Clay, it doesn't seem like ANYBODY liked Cook. I found that stunning-that a guy so successful could be so reviled by critics, comedy lovers, and, most of all, his fellow comedians. I wondered why-then I saw this film. Well most of it. By the time the end rolled around the seething rage I felt for the rampant stupidity being hurled at me throughout this P.O.S left me depressed. I had to go watch a Marx Brothers movie to laugh and love again. This is one of the worst idiot comedies ever made. Adam Sandler could only dream of reaching this level of agitation. The plot is so stupid it's not worth mentioning. The performances are all bad, but I reserve special scorn for Cook. The guy can't act. At all. Sandler can't either but he at least seems comfortable enough in front of the camera. Cook looks throughout like a deer in headlights. Even when he rattles off some stand up jokes, he looks like he's about to pee his pants in terror. The breaking point for me was when the movie suddenly-in another Sandler-like turn-decided we should take a moment from laughing at these idiotic scumbags and feel SORRY for wittle Daney Waney because he's sad and lonely. I've seen this strategy before but never in such an undeserving manner as this. I finally checked out. I hope the movie didn't suddenly turn into a comedy classic in the last 2 minutes, but if it did, whatever. I'm better off not knowing and so are you. Whether you like Cook or not, stay away from this. It's not funny, it's just vile. Not in a nose picking way, but a drive by shooting way. NOW I understand the hate.

Prattay S (ca) wrote: Now thats a history that most of the people forget but if you wanna know about JOY DIVISON then you will get it. A touching true story.

Private U (ca) wrote: The words "Epic Fail" spring to mind...I give it half a star purely because it had swords in it.

Hunter W (kr) wrote: The film moves the franchise into darker terrain and maturer themes. For what it does lack in storytelling, and some key book points that it leaves on the table, The Goblet of Fire makes up for with compelling drama and exciting action sequences.

Birger E (jp) wrote: so.bad.had to watch this piece of cinema cancer twice in a school subject, and i would rather pull out my eyeballs with a spoon and blow out my ears than watch this one more time. The music is maybe the worst soundtrack ive ever heard in a movie.

Stig S (it) wrote: The flixter cast list for this film seem to be wrong. My rating is for the Japanese film "Monday" directed by "Sabu" (Hiroyuki Tanaka)

Billy L (mx) wrote: All he wanted was to go back to Hawaii! And then to make things worse, everyone makes fun of him. :-(

Kyle R (jp) wrote: Perhaps I need to see it again to appreciate. Good acting, great sound, nice camera work. Unfortunately I was incredibly bored with the surface story. I spent most of the viewing attempting to decipher the themes and allegory but could not really come up with anything meaningful or concrete.

Brandon T (it) wrote: Bateman is an irritating bore but the direction is decent and the soundtrack is solid. Estee Chandler is good as the love interest but the rest of the actors seem totally bored or are just phoning it in. It's not the original but it has a zany charm that I find endearing.

Nick F (it) wrote: With near perfect directing from Martin Scorsese and most notably amazing screenwriting from Paul Schrader including arguably Robert De Niro's finest performance to date, Taxi Driver delivers an raw yet in-depth character study that is obsolete in current cinema.

Jay A (it) wrote: I love this movie I watch it when I am sad and this cheers me up every time

Scott R (ag) wrote: Hoffman is very entertaining.

Gina B (gb) wrote: Unexpected and unplanned "snob night's" poetic movie. I don't know why it should be a wrong movie and it's not, except the title.