#

Larisa empisteftiko

Two villages in the plain of Thessaly in Greece are at loggerheads because none of them wants a unit of biological cleaning to be installed in its premises but lobbies for it to be ...

. . Two villages in the plain of Thessaly in Greece are at loggerheads because none of them wants a unit of biological cleaning to be installed in its premises but lobbies for it to be

Larisa empisteftiko is a excited movies torrent of Polyxeni Fragouli. The released year of this movie is 2012. There are many actors in this movie torrents, such as Babis Alatzas, Petros Bousoulopoulos, Eftihia Fanarioti, Eleni Gerasimidou, Michalis Iatropoulos, Marios Iordanou, Tasos Kostis, Bessy Malfa, Mihalis Marinos, Dimitris Mavropoulos, Anna Monogiou, Stavros Nikolaidis, Tasos Palatzidis, Regina Pantelidi, Efi Papatheodorou. There are many categories, such as Comedy. Many people rated for this movie, Rate is 3.5 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movie to watch. Please support us via sharing this movies to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Larisa empisteftiko torrents

Larisa empisteftiko full movie

Larisa empisteftiko 2012 torrent

Larisa empisteftiko torrent, Larisa empisteftiko movie torrents, download Larisa empisteftiko full movie, Larisa empisteftiko 2012 torrents, download Larisa empisteftiko 2012 torrents, watch Larisa empisteftiko movie, Larisa empisteftiko englishsub, free download Larisa empisteftiko movie, movie Larisa empisteftiko torrent

Links Name Quality Seeders Leechers Size
Download   Larisa Empisteytiko Other 67 30 1.3 GB
Download   Larisa Empisteftiko (ΛΑΡΙΣΑ &E Other 41 29 1.3 GB
Download   LARISA EMPISTEYTIKO Other 38 31 1.3 GB
Download   larisa empisteytiko Other 25 35 1.3 GB

Users reviews


Claus M (it)

when adversity gives equal strength


Diego F V (de)

Es un acierto lograr ese ambiente medio incestuoso, medio vicioso para llegar asi a unas representaciones de impecable factura. Metzengerstein - adaptado por Roger Vadim - 4/5Interesante adaptacion, aunque mas que por el virtusiosismo en la parte visual que deja ver el talento de este director, me parece apropiado dentro de lo inapropiado la manera en que Vadim juega un poco con el subtexto del cuento original para conseguir asi una inquietante vision malevola del personaje de la condesa Frederique de Metzengerstein, interpretado seductoramente por Jane Fonda, al colocar como su contraparte, el baron Wilhelm Berlifitzing, el hombre que consigue arrancarle un poco de amor de su alma viciada por los excesos, a Peter Fonda, hermano de la protagonista en la vida, primos dentro de la historia. :::::::::::::::::::::::::1. Espectacular, como siempre, Brigitte Bardot en el papel de Giuseppina, y mejor todavia la interpretacion de Alain Delon en el papel de William Wilson, quien padece el fenomeno de Doppelganger, tema en el que se basa la historia. Con unos decorados fastuosos y unas actuaciones excelentes, Louis Malle consigue meter al espectador de lleno en ese mundo misterioso inventado por Poe, de que manera? Siendo fiel al relato, alejandose de las licencias a las que tiene derecho todo artista (audiovisual sobre todo) para deleitarnos con una excelente pieza. William Wilson - adaptado por Louis Malle - 4/5Es quizas, la adaptacion mas fiel de esta tripleta de cuentos. :::::::::::::::::::::::::2. *Los cuentos de Poe son de lectura obligatoria!. Visiones oniricas desde el punto de vista fantasmagorico, personajes caricaturescos a lo largo del relato, escenarios y decorados unicos, hacen que esta 'libre adaptacion' se convierta en el homenaje perfecto a ese otro genio: Edgar Allan Poe. Toby Dammit tiene toda la carga simbolica y surrealista que le granjearon la fama de genio a este genio. En la obra de Fellini los sucesos son mas fieles a la estetica del director, todo ocurre durante la epoca de los 60's en donde Toby Dammit (interpretado por Terence Stamp) es una estrella decadente del cine ingles que es llamado para trabajar en una pelicula de argumento escandaloso en Roma; a Dammit ya no le importa nada, se lo hace saber a todo el mundo y apenas esta a la espera de su paga: un Ferrari ultimo modelo. El nombre del cuento original escrito por Poe es Nunca Apuestes tu Cabeza al Diablo, relato sobre un chico ocioso y pendenciero que termina perdiendo la cabeza (de manera literal) por una estupida apuesta. Una adaptacion mas libre y personal, con una interpretacion desde el punto de vista de Fellini lo que, de entrada, es garantia de exito. La mejor adaptacion de todos los cuentos de esta pelicula. Toby Dammit - adaptado por Federico Fellini - 5+/5Re-del putas!. Tres cortometrajes de una factura impecable y con la participacion de grandes luminarias del cine de la epoca:::::::::::::::::::::::::3. Tambien conocida como Tre passi nel delirio o Histoires extraordinaires, este filme recoge el talento de tres grandes directores europeos (Federico Fellini, Louis Malle y Roger Vadim) para llevar a escena tres excelentes cuentos del 'extraordinario' Edgar Allan Poe


ers (gb)

. . iyi film, tirajikomik de denebilir. . vs vs. . filmde ilginc ayr?nt?lar war, mesela adam?na cok a??k odlgu ama onu b?ark?p giden bi kad?nla kar??la??or paris te bir otelde 5sene nce olan bi olaym?? kad?n b?rak?p gitmi?, onunla konu?uor vs kad?n? reddediyor, sonra telefondaki uyand?rma serwisinden bunun ehr?eyini bilen bi tane hatunla randewu ayalrmaya ca???or ama beceremior. . en sonda adam yine bir kad?n?n bacakalr?na bak?orken onu takip edior , kad?n ko?tukca o da ko?uor derken adama aaraba carop?or ve boynu vs heryeri yatalk oluor gibi bi?i, daha sonra da yine ona bakmaya gelen bir hem?ireye doru ynelecem die yere d?or ve lor , filmin en ba??nda da adam?n cenazesi ile ba?l?or zaten son sahnede de o war,cenzaede bizim sar???n gzel editr bi?iler konu?uor vs ,birlikte oldugu kad?nlar teekr teker mezara toprak at?orlar vs. . sonra zaten o da adamla birlikte oluor vs. . filmin kahraman? ucak mhendisi gibi bi adam montpellier de ya??or ve bekar st bekar bi adam, kad?nlar? seven bi adam filmin ad?ndan danal??ol?or, takipi ve ?ansl? denebilir ama kad?nlarla birlikte olmay? cok sewen bi adam, bir gn bunlar? yazmaya karar werior ve kitapla?t?r?or? ves paris e yay?nevlerine gnderior kitab? ve en osnunda sar???n editrn birisi cok ebgenior ve dier editrleri de ikna edip kaitba?n bas?lmas? iin olumlu karar c?kart?or. . bence bir ba?yap?t, truffaut nun filmlerinden,77 yap?m? olmas?ndan dolay? diorum zellikle, zman?n? a?m?? dieceim ama o dnem avrupa sinemas? zlelikle frans?z ve italyan sinemas? tam bu tarz yap?or filmleri


Girish B (us)

. . a new dimension in tamil cinema. . . . . excellent


jeanie g (ag)

l. . . . I think. It was revitting,exciting,and was where they got characters from devil's rejects


Jeff B (ag)

I generally don't really like movies involving self-destructive characters


Jesse O (ag)

It's a bad movie and I wouldn't recommend it whatsoever. It gets one-star simply because I'm being kinder than I probably should. It's not the worst movie I've ever seen, but this was just no good at all. Sadly, however, the movie doesn't add other more atmospheric moments to supplement the jump scares, so the movie just ends up feeling completely barren. But they're, thankfully, not as prevalent here as in others. It's not actually scary, all it does is startle you. They're a cheap way to scare someone. There's some jump scares, obviously, but I've made my feelings on jump scares known forever now. Also, for a horror movie, this movie is lacking a lot of the horror. I got everything, but it wasn't exactly well-written or interesting for that matter. The story is also somewhat convoluted. And the character had an interesting enough backstory that they could have actually used, but they didn't and instead had her be an asshole to almost everybody she meets in the movie. Camilla Luddington was solid enough, but her character was honestly kind of a dick. Another thing that makes a little difficult to get into the movie is how unlikable June, the protagonist, is. But when you have only two real suspects and one of them is so clearly a red herring, then that makes it a little difficult to get into. Whether you do as it was done in Saw, where the killer was seen in flashbacks, or whether you have multiple people, the point is that you're intrigued enough by the story and how its mystery is put together to keep watching. Part of the appeal of these movies, those where you don't know who the killer is, is the mystery behind who it actually is. There's only two people it COULD be and one of those is a very obvious red herring, particularly if you look at this person's behavior throughout the entire movie. The movie is put together in such a way that you know who the murderer is without any real sort of suspense. There's a copycat killer going around and, obviously, copying the MO of the Judas Killer's murders. There's very little in the way of substance in this movie. This movie justifies its own existence by saying 'just because' and that's it. The film does a shit job at justifying its own existence to be honest, which is that a successful sequel must do in order to get audiences to buy into whatever story they want to tell. I may have still asked why we needed a sequel if it ended up being good, but I wouldn't harp on it as much as I'm doing now. That's why I was wondering why there was a need for one. A sequel that, sadly, isn't any good whatsoever. Which is why I was a little surprise to see a sequel. I don't wanna say it was all that, because that would be ignorant, but there's just nothing about the original flick that really inspires excitement to actually sit down and watch it. And I do think that The Pact had some of that. Not even because I actually want to watch them. Particularly for horror geeks, I can't tell you how many horror movies I've seen just because they're available on Netflix or Amazon. This is the type of movie that someone watches just because it's there. While the original film received a somewhat positive critical reception, it wasn't overwhelming to the point where I felt that horror geeks felt they had to watch this. This movie is a perfect example of that. But let's say that the movie did make that, and it isn't taking into consideration DVD sales VOD, that's not even necessarily reason enough to commission a sequel. I just find it difficult to believe that the first movie made that much money, at least in comparison to its budget. Then again this is according to Wikipedia, which isn't the most reliable of sources. The movie cost $400,000 to make and it earned slightly over $7 million at the box office. I mean I thought the first movie was actually fairly decent and everything, but it's not like the movie set the world on fire, at least in my opinion. First things first, why does this sequel exist? Shitty way to start a review, but it's worth asking


Melvin W (fr)

If you're a fan of the genre, it's definitely a can't miss film. It's a movie that's well worth a look and may possibly be one of the better movies of this type out there. Fresh could just be considered another urban drama about the life of the street, but it does manage to be better than that. Jackson is easily the biggest name in this and he has a small, but nonetheless important role as Fresh's absent and alcoholic father. Samuel L. The rest of the cast is nothing too special, but they aren't too bad, for the most part, either. He exudes a maturity and adulthood presence into a character that is years beyond his age. He runs drugs for local dealers to make money so that one day he can escape the ghetto, but the question is will he be able to escape the violence of the job he does in time?Sean Nelson really is brilliant as Fresh. His sister has left his aunts house and is a dope fiend who shacks up with whatever dealer she can. His father is an alcoholic, who he only sees in the park to play chess. His mothers gone and we can only assume dead. Fresh has a lot of problems, especially considering he is only eight years old. It's nothing necessarily new, with a ghetto crime backdrop, but the character of Fresh is a fresh and well rounded enough character to make us feel like we're watching this type of movie for the first time. The movie isn't perfect, with moments of shaky writing and shakier acting by some, but for the most part it's well acted and well written. "Fresh is a solid, ghetto drama about a young 12 year old boy who runs drugs to support himself, but loses out on any sort of a real childhood in the process. to beat the odds in a deadly game of survival. . . "Risking it all, he invents new rules. Corky: Only reason you ain't the man is you still too goddamn little, but, when you get bigger, you gonna be the man


Movie T (jp)

Peter Gallagher and Laura San Giacomo are so disgusting


Nicolas E (mx)

Looking a bit boring but is a good movie