Les Enfants Terribles
Elisabeth and her brother Paul live isolated from much of the world after Paul is injured in a snowball fight. As a coping mechanism, the two conjure up a hermetic dream of their own making. Their relationship, however, isn't exactly wholesome. Jealousy and a malevolent undercurrent intrude on their fantasy when Elisabeth invites the strange Agathe to stay with them -- and Paul is immediately attracted to her.
- Stars:Nicole Stéphane, Edouard Dermithe, Renée Cosima, Jacques Bernard, Melvyn Martin, Maria Cyliakus, Jean-Marie Robain, Maurice Revel, Rachel Devirys, Adeline Aucoc, Emile Mathys, Roger Gaillard, Jean Cocteau, Annabel Buffet, Karin Lannby,
- Director:Jean-Pierre Melville,
In a snowball fight between schoolboys the handsome Dargelos hits the chest of Paul, who drops unconscious to the ground. Paul has a deep affection for Dargelos, and later denies that there... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Les Enfants Terribles torrent reviews
(es) wrote: Una entretenida historia sobre el origen del mayor contenido en la internet
(it) wrote: "Gamer" is a mean-spirited, misogynist, poorly edited and poorly shot action film. The characters are clich and the world the story is set in so vaguely defined that it's impossible to understand what is going on. I'm not usually one to criticize a film for feeling familiar because if you look deeply enough, a lot of people take inspiration from myths or common story elements, but when your movie brings in nothing new and doesn't even feel like it's trying, I call foul.The film is set in 2024. The gaming industry has been revolutionized because now, instead of playing regular video games people can command prisoners to fight to the death in a "real life" video game called Slayers. If you don't feel like having convicts fight each other to the death? Well that's ok because you can also have other human beings dance around, perform dangerous stunts, have gratuitous sex or embarrass each other in a tamer game called "Society" where poor people get paid to have their bodies controlled by others. Our hero is John "Kable" Tillman (Gerard Butler), the most popular pawn in the game of Slayers. There's something sinister about this futuristic society, and if the probably evil Castle (Michael C. Hall) is to be taken down, Kable will have to take control of his own body!What irritated me about this picture is that the story just feels like an excuse to have stuff happen. Really important elements of this world are never explained, they're just there and you have to take for granted that it works the way it does. I don't mean in the same way that a far-out premise like say... "The Running Man" either. I'm talking about stuff that could plausibly happen but is presented in a way that makes no sense. For example, the rules or goals of the Slayers game are never established. What is the objective of the game? Do the slayers have to run to a shelter before they are killed? Do you have to murder a certain amount of people? Is there a time limit? You never find out. How has Slayers revolutionized video games anyways? It's not like the players can feel what their convicts can feel, and games can't be started at any time of the day (they're televised) so how is a video game that you can pick up for cheaper, play at any time not strickly better? This is a tale that doesn't care about explaining anything or developing the world it's set in so it's really hard to care about anything that's going on. Stuff just happens so that we can have people kill each other.I'll give the movie this: if the objective was to make a game that feels like a deplorable video game, mission accomplished! The characters actually feel like video game personalities because your immediate impression of them is everything that defines them. The villain is very obviously evil (even though it's supposed to be a mystery) for example and he does that typical thing that every bad villain does in a bad action movie. I'm just saying that you would never see Mr. Glass from "Unbreakable" pick a fight with Arnold Schwarzenegger because one is a brainy villain, the other is an action hero... but that doesn't stop our Machiavellian sociopath! Kable isn't any better. He's set up as a killer but anyone with half a brain can see that this is once again, one of these movies where our anti-hero isn't an actual anti hero, he's just a good guy that's been misunderstood. Nearly every other character is totally disposable, and not the least bit memorable. Unless they're a woman because those are all killed or sexually exploited by the time the credits roll. Females in "Gamer" are more like props than actual people. I was actually really disturbed by some of the events in the film. Want a hint of some of the distasteful developments? How about I give you an easy one: there's a character called "Rick Rape" in the "tamer" Society game! There are a few scenes that have good action segments and there are a couple of laughs here and there but there's no real audience for this movie. You would think that this action film would be made to cater to video game enthusiasts, but they're all portrayed as unlikeable sexual deviants that would willingly sexually assault or murder human beings for kicks. "Gamer" goes out of its way to show how horrible it is to get entertainment out of seeing human beings being killed, so people who revel in violence and gore (fans of action or horror movies) won't get much entertainment out of this lecture either. There's no need to see this when there are actual good movies based on the same concept easily available. I came to thoroughly hate "Gamer". (Dvd, July 14, 2012)
(gb) wrote: Comica, inesperada, Genial...
(br) wrote: Hah, not too nice...
(au) wrote: In fairness, I barely had any sleep before watching, so I did dose a little, plus I was with my girlfriend so I felt very relaxed. This movie has lots of shooting of zombies with pistols. I couldn't follow the story too well. Lots of neat blood though, and killings. Let's just give the thing an 8 and say "Minneapolis is weird".
(it) wrote: Very cool film. Maybe just a bit longer than it needs to be (I could've used a few less basketball scenes personally). But still a really cool movie. The cast is great, especially Rob Brown, and Sean Connery is fascinating to watch, as always. Heartwarming and entertaining. Kind of feels like an unofficial sequel to Good Will Hunting, which Gus Van Sant also directed.
(gb) wrote: movie nite.....the scenery of this looks great, costume excellent,but I could not understand much of the dialogue...I spent alot of time saying "what did he say??"
(au) wrote: 2013-12-04 rewatched from Disj
(mx) wrote: While far from being a good movie, Kershner does a great job at capturing the late 1970's fashion scene. It feels like the constant struggle of Kershner to find "realism" within in the context of a lame horror movie conceit created an almost psychitzophrenic and often profane movie that fails to scare or surprise. But what matters most is that despite itself, Eyes of Laura Mars is oddly entertaining. The unintended camp factor has become even more fun with time. And, for that alone, the film has merit.
(au) wrote: This movie is fun to watch with a large crowd
(us) wrote: Tried to be Jurassic Park, ended up as more Plan 9 from Outer Space.
(mx) wrote: Iron Sky is a decent comedy, making fun of anything and everyone. It is deliberately made poorly, with obvious parody scenes and obvious remarks. There is not a hint of subtlety with this fantastical science fiction re-imagining of absurd what ifs. It is better than its counterparts such as Snakes on a Plane, but still not an enjoyable movie. It is lazy and too obviously cheap. Iron Sky is an idea executed off poor foundations.
(de) wrote: Nailbiter is easily watchable, but it holds back too much on gore and scares, making it never as good as it could be. 51/100
(it) wrote: I like the movie but it's not as good as the first one but over all great action and an okay sorry