A wannabe dad mistakes a vertically challenged criminal on the lam as his newly adopted son.

After leaving the prison, the dwarf criminal Calvin Sims joins to his moron brother Percy to steal an expensive huge diamond in a jewelry for the mobster Walken. They are chased by the police, and Calvin hides the stone in the purse of the executive Vanessa Edwards, whose husband Darryl Edwards wants to have a baby. Percy convinces Calvin to dress like a baby and be left in front of the Edwards's house to get inside the house and retrieve the diamond. Darryl and Vanessa keep Calvin for the weekend and decide to adopt him, while Walken threatens Darryl to get the stone back. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Littleman torrent reviews

Tungis G (ag) wrote: If you have the patients for it and don't mind a subtle film about character this is worth a watch. The premise left me feeling like it was "6th sense lite" which isn't a bad thing at all, in fact its the best part. More like a clever slight of hand parlor trick than a big stage magic performance but its no less effective because it is so clever. I found myself contemplating it the next day in the way most film can't get me to do. Its so subtle i bet lots of people wont get it, but when you do its a pretty neat revelation. The execution of the actors is fairly weak, but you know that. When Jennifer Love Hewitt is your anchor actor, but they all do fine enough for the weight of this clever little film.

Greg W (kr) wrote: when u have gr8 talent b4 and behind the camera u cant go wrong and u don't go wrong here either

Helena M (ca) wrote: Boring, that's all I can say.

Jason P (ag) wrote: My wife has always spoken highly of Bonhoeffer, so I've been interested to learn more about the man. This was an interesting, if a little slow-moving, take on his life. At only an hour and a half (thank you, director), it manages to feel quite thorough, at least in terms of overview.

Anna Kiyah S (it) wrote: wasn't really into it.

khurram m (jp) wrote: i knew shyam bengal would not just disappoint me. took me a while, but message was conveyed

Michael H (ca) wrote: A classic. Way better than the first one.

Jessica H (au) wrote: tries to recreate the same magic from the first film, without realizing why the first film was so good.

I dont know w (gb) wrote: Said to be one of the worst sequels in a while.

Jayakrishnan R (gb) wrote: 81%Saw this on 3/8/16It takes some time to become interesting and it's hard to watch becuase it is unfocussed, yet the film manages to stay afloat thanks to Pacino and some message hidden in the muddle. The satire intended in this film is not properly utilized making it a bit hard to watch and enjoy it.

Michael R (us) wrote: Amazing movie just for the one-liners: "Half of the people in the world are women; why does it have to be YOU that stirs me?"