• Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:40 minutes
  • Release:2004
  • Language:Japanese
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:Longinus 2004 full movies, Longinus torrents movie

A war rages on, its end unknown, covering the world in despair. At a military field hospital, a group of soldiers bring in one of their own, wounded by a large, vicious, bite-like wound, along with a large box. The soldiers are visibly shaken. Suddenly, an enigmatic man appears. As he starts to tell them the legend of the Lance of Longinus, their night of unimaginable terror begins. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Longinus torrent reviews

Jev M (es) wrote: There isn't much that you can say about a movie with the title of WolfCop. What you can say however is that it lives up to every word in the title. I am so pumped that my eyeballs just soaked in this experience. I couldn't give this movie enough stars. With that being said, watch this movie IMMEDIATELY.

Panayiotis P (de) wrote: Nothing special regarding this film. Childish comedy with stupid jokes which may or may not get on your nerves. It had a good point behind it since this is the sad reality of today. People fixated with social networking, status updates and so called friends. However, the take home message could have been delivered better.

Pablo E (ru) wrote: El musical de Stuart Murdoc (belle & sebastian) tiene mucha msica interesante pero por momentos carece de entretencin. la tpica historia del nio retraido que logra la atencin de la guapa y atrevida, solo que contada a travs de la unin que produce en un grupo de 3 personas en virtud de la msica. No recomendable, salvo un par de canciones.

Sarah P (de) wrote: I liked this a lot - the kids were adorable and very believable and you could really feel the mother's struggle. Definitely worth watching.

Taryn F (nl) wrote: Extremely funny, a great laugh all round!

Tabitha W (gb) wrote: A nice indie film. Boy is stuck in small town. Boy finds love before he takes that step in leaving to college.

Crystal W (mx) wrote: More great music and Hrithik.

phoebe w (it) wrote: My favourite film, I loved the plot it was interesting and quirky and so were all of the characters.

Tara H (jp) wrote: I know it isn't a perfect film but it's one of my favourite Jean Harlow roles. I also liked the working class storyline, Una Merkel, and a young Spencer Tracy. (Also, watch out for Mickey Rooney!)

Magill F (br) wrote: I had a blast watching this movie! The rats were surprisingly well-designed, and the movie gets going really fast with little to no dilly-dallying. As one would expect, there are quite a few problems with the script, but hey, who cares when you've got killer wiener dog rats? Canadians (more specifically Torontonians) will also get a kick out of spotting all the familiar landmarks featured here.

Edith N (gb) wrote: The Origin of Those Anachronistically Rebellious Girls A consistent problem in fiction for young women set in an earlier age is that the women are often too modern. They're always rebelling against societal expectations in ways which indicate that the people writing the fiction don't understand how societal expectations work. The problem, I think, is twofold. The first is that a lot of the fiction just isn't written very well. The second is that the authors have read and seen things like this, the novel of which was published in 1905, and thought, "Well, the girl in that is wild and rebellious and doesn't want to get married, so it's okay that my character doesn't!" What those writers fail to realize is that this character, and others like her, must suffer consequences for her behaviour. She will not be accepted by everyone--and it is my understanding that Miles Franklin, the woman who wrote the novel, was reviled by her friends and family for it to the point that her estate pulled the novel out of publication for ten years after her death. Sybylla Melvyn (Judy Davis) is the eldest daughter of a bush farmer (Alan Hopgood). Her mother (Julia Blake) is from a rich family, and Sybylla is sent to them in the hopes that they can make a lady of her and hopefully even marry her off to a rich young man. But Sybylla has other plans. First of all, she thinks she is too plain to be of much value in the marriage stakes. And second, she doesn't much want to get married at all. She wants to have a career as a writer or an actress or similar. Maybe the opera. Her grandmother (Aileen Britton) hopes to set her up with wealthy Frank Hawdon (Robert Grubb), but Sybylla can't stand him, even if he is about to come into a fortune back in England. There is, however, Harry Beecham (Sam Neill), who was a childhood friend of hers. He is rich and handsome and adventurous, and the only problem is that he will expect her to be a conventional wife. At least, that's the only problem at first. It's so odd to watch this. Judy Davis looks almost nothing like how she looks now--if anything, she looks like a young Nicole Kidman. (Though not young enough, quite; Kidman was fourteen at the time.) It doesn't help that I'm used to hearing her speak with an American accent, so she doesn't even sound the way I'm used to. And then there's Sam Neill, who at least sounds the same. Though that's because I've seen rather more of his Australian films. It's a common issue with me. I'm always seeing someone-or-other's first film, often without realizing that they're in it, and spending the entire thing captivated by how young they look or how little they look the way I'm used to. It rather distracts from the rest of the movie, at least until I've adjusted and can move on. I tend to prefer not realizing it until after the movie is over, actually, because that means at least I was able to pay attention. I feel a great deal of sympathy for Sybylla. She was living in a time and place where she didn't have a lot of control over her own destiny. At least, not for the most part. She didn't get to choose when to come and when to go. In fact, she's rather lucky no one simply orders her to marry Frank. She has no money of her own. She is essentially her parents' property, theirs to do with as they please. And they don't have a lot of property other than her and her siblings, so bad luck for her. And of course, the things which make her most desirable to a modern audience are the things which made her least acceptable in her own time. Headstrong and willful are not positive traits in a young turn-of-the-last-century girl, especially not one moving in higher reaches of society. Fun is fun, but in the end, a girl is expected to do what is proper for her. And what is proper for a girl like Sybylla is not singing bawdy songs in front of her grandmother's upper-crust friends, no matter how much those friends enjoy it. In the end, that is the tragedy of this story. None of these people can imagine a marriage where Sybylla is not expected to put her husband's wishes first. Marriage by the standards of her society is a kind of death to the person she was before then. Possibly Harry would allow her more freedom than an ordinary husband, but possibly not. Certainly it is hard to imagine her leading her mother's kind of life. Her aunt (Wendy Hughes) warns her against marrying for love, because her aunt's husband left her, leaving Aunt Helen disgraced. Not a wife, widow, or maid, she says. Not good enough for her man. That the man should be so inconstant is less of a problem, it seems. This is the real problem with these kinds of stories when written by people who do not understand the realities of Sybylla's life, too. As a successful writer, Sybylla might be allowed a few little eccentricities. But she would always be second best to the girls who did get married and do what was expected of them. Fortunately, just not to herself.

David S (ru) wrote: It's gory, campy, ridiculous and has an awesome cameo by Roman Polanski. Thumbs Up!

Thrse F (ca) wrote: One of my patron saints...

Mike A (gb) wrote: Excellent film. One-armed stranger turns up in a one-street western town. The locals don't like strangers!

Willem C (de) wrote: This movie was eye opening to say the least. I honestly didn't know the amount of technical innovation was available in animated titles in the 70's. I also didn't know America was still that outwardly racist. This movie plays like a back-alley, sketchy video store VHS tape, and it was really disturbing. That being said, it definitely seemed well made on the technical side. It was a lot harder for me to stomach than I thought it would have been, but I think if you can get through the trailer, it's worth seeing.

Luke S (fr) wrote: this is an amazingly funny and entertaining movie.

Emily A (gb) wrote: What a terrific bad movie! If you're going to go in with a ridiculous premise for a film, you can't do it half-cocked; You have to run with it with furious gusto and and hysterical glee, which is exactly what happened here. This movie is actually pretty well-made: the effects are quite admirable (well, except for the flying warlock) and the writing is actually pretty tight. The dialogue is a little cheesy, but the characters are really well crafted. I think this film should get extra points for not falling into the trap of making their characters (especially the heroine) lunkheads for the sake of advancing the plot. Redferne and Kassandra actually make a pretty adept witch-hunting team and formidable adversaries for the devilishly slimy Warlock. Oh man. Julian Sands is great in this movie. You can just tell that he's having fun being evil, and that sense of delicious fun is infectious. The Warlock is one of my new favorite cinema villains. I was really impressed with the fire effects, even moreso considering this movie was made in the late 80s. This movie is wonderful trash. I think I might have enjoyed it even more since I was a huge fan of Hocus Pocus as a child. The parallels are unmistakable. This is like Hocus Pocus for grownups, and Sands is as wicked in this movie as Bette Midler was in that one.