It is about a young pickpocket (Peter Facinelli) who work in New York metro. He come across to face a woman (Jamie Alexander) whom he had a wonderful one-night case. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
You may also like
Loosies torrent reviews
Jesse O (nl) wrote: I wouldn't call this the best monster film I've ever seen, The Host is, like, worlds above this movie in almost every aspect. The writing, the acting, the story, the comedy. Everything, but this wasn't that bad of a film. I feel like I don't have much to say about this film, but watch me write a 1,000 word review. I hope that is not the case as this film really just came and went without making much of an impression on me. It's not that bad, when thinking back on it, but it's not something that will be particularly memorable to you 20 minutes after finishing it up. In fact, I finished the movie and I immediately went to sleep. It's that type of film, you just watch it and you're done with it. You don't think about it, you don't talk about it, you're just done. I suppose that should be a compliment, but I don't think it is in the sense that you don't really react to anything that you see. At least in shitty horror movies there's the release of that pent-up frustration over having seen a terrible movie. It's therapeutic, in a sense. It's not that I enjoy watching shitty horror movies because it gives me a chance to shit on it, it's that at least it got some sort of emotional reaction from me. As opposed to this one, where there's nothing for me to really say about it other than it's perfectly watchable. On to the things I did like, the monster make-up is actually really quite good. It's a mix of practical make-up and computer graphics. While the computer graphics are a little lacking, their usage is so minimal that it doesn't really affect the movie one way or another. This make-up effects aren't nearly as good as the ones in Cabin Fever: Patient Zero, a movie that isn't good but has some of the best practical make-up effects in any horror movie in years. But, at the very least, the monster in this film actually looks and feels like one rather than a poor CG. The acting is fairly decent all things considered, the characters, while one-dimensional, at least have some sort of story going so that, at the very least, you can somewhat be invested and care about them. It doesn't always work, but at least they make an effort to give you a reason to want to watch how everything plays out for these characters. The gore is decent, nothing to really write home about. Of course, the film has the stereotypical 'it's not really over' ending that have become an absolute joke in horror for, seemingly, decades now. With that said, this film was perfectly fine. It won't make you feel anything, it won't make you pull your hair out, and that's a good thing for some who look down on the horror genre, but it's not something that will stick with you for a very long time. It's watchable while still being below average, I can't complain a lot. Not perfect, but there's some decent stuff here that some horror geeks will probably appreciate more than me.
Ellen G (nl) wrote: Er jo bare helt fantaskisk (rvva). Har en evig fasinasjon av slike filmer. Hva blir det neste?
Travis D (au) wrote: Funny movie. Worth watching
Andrew D (us) wrote: Witty, brisk, sleek, funny, sad, everything. It's everything.It's twisted, and dark, and it's incredible. I don't know how this film came to be so underrated, but on the other hand, I'm not even sure how this film had an American release, so I don't know, maybe I shouldn't be surprised? But thanks to this, and Seven Psychopaths, I have full confidence in Martin Mcdonagh to write and direct his way to the top in black comedy filmmaking. Can't wait for whatever comes next.
Planet C (br) wrote: If it is a Wong Kar Wai film then expect a great cinematography but this film is the weakest link of all Mr. Wong's film.
Sharon E (fr) wrote: A harsh reality comes to life on the screen. Very true.
Arum Padma O (au) wrote: There's a story but there's no directing? I wasn't thrilled at all.
Robert G (nl) wrote: I enjoyed this movie very much. The acting is great and one of my favorites that I enjoy watching often. No disrespect to Mr. Swayzee, but Mr. Purejoy is the star in this wonderful saturday or sunday leasuire time classic. Michael Clarke Duncan is quite funny although he's still a heavy. Good family fare and a great cast. Kudo's on this fun.
Jonathan D (es) wrote: Disingenuous, phoney, creepy.
Sage B (ag) wrote: This movie not only sucked but it was fuckin horrible! So a guy trades his stupid suit for an even more stupid suit! Then u have a lazy bitch who never gets out of bed and U have all the po-dunc retards of the west around with there stupid fuckin tex-ass ascent. I mean, just by reading the back of the movie I could already tell that it was going 2 suck! Not 2 mention a waist of time, U would have a much more entertaining time watching some other movie that sux take 4 example.....A river runs threw it, wanna know what that movie is about.... or at least they talk about 99.9% of the time! FISHING AND GOD, 2 of the most boring subjects known 2 man!
Skyler I (jp) wrote: Ok, not as good as i thought it would be.
jay n (au) wrote: The leads elevate a decent script to a superior level.
Andruw F (de) wrote: So unfunny, it makes you angry considering the talent on screen. And so boring, you want it to end as soon as possible!
Maricela C (mx) wrote: Good movie about basketball
Jeff L (ru) wrote: Tremors is not a good movie, even if it is cheesy fun.
Basil D (nl) wrote: An improvement to the franchise. This was Enjoyable to watch.