Love Me Tender

Love Me Tender

Elvis Prestley's first film is a Civil War drama.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:89 minutes
  • Release:1956
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:escape,   murder,   robbery,  

Confederate soldiers led by Vance Reno (Richard Egan) rob a Union train of its payroll money. But the war ends leaving these men with their Union loot, until the Feds come looking for it. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Love Me Tender torrent reviews

Vuong B (it) wrote: one of the better video game adaptations.

Gustavo A (mx) wrote: This movie was plotless and took forever just to get through the pointless scenes. The dialouge in this movie was good but there was way too much of it in some parts. Also, near the end of the movie, what happened to the guy with the brown jacket, he just dissappeared and never showed up for the rest of the movie.

Peter A (ca) wrote: A gentle movie with inner tension that could have been used to better purpose. Mark, a latter-day hippy in search of self, and Kurt, a compliant father-to-be, go on a camping trip, the spur of the moment. Kurt is more personally grounded and eager to talk about whatever the two lost as they grew apart, post-college or high school. Mark is more into avoidance, right down to the scene in which the men are lying in adjoining wooden tubs full of steaming water and Kurt gets up, smokes joint, and tries to make a physical connection. There are hints that they might have had a sexual fling years past, but Mark is not going that far now. His expressions say more than his words. The duo talk in circles and the dialogue never gets very interesting. It's all about Kurt's taking a course in physics, his vision of the universe, and Mark's volunteering to teach woodworking to teenagers. At least Mark gets party animated sharing this. There is a hint from Mark that Kurt also does volunteering, but to a "very different community" - the only hint of Kurt's possible gayness. Wish the movie had more intense conversation and that Kurt had broken through Mark's innate privacy boundaries. As it is, it's thoughtful, but needed to get to a bolder place.

F B (de) wrote: Without doubt a powerful film which accurately portrays the attitude of so many of London's undesirable youth and their disgusting low life moral values. Also strongly shows why this country is in such a mess when these types of low life are actually looked up to by the more decent youth.

Jayden C (nl) wrote: really not interested

John C (nl) wrote: Any guy watching this film has to admit it is because of Heather Graham, considering the plot and acting is next to awful

Trevor F (ca) wrote: one of Bales finest roles, super underrated by critics, cause well, they are dumb. great cast and great story. so glad this has a cult following now.

Martin T (fr) wrote: Like most Mamet films, this one is intricately plotted in a way that keeps you hungry for the next piece of the puzzle, and it contains his fantastic stylized dialogue and another compelling performance by Joe Mantegna. But there's a lot of loose ends and things that don't quite add up in a sensible way. And the way the film deals with anti-Semitism is odd. While I agree it's a problem, it's usually something people keep to themselves, or as part of shady organizations. It's rarely displayed so widely and so openly, especially not in an urban neighborhood (south side Chicago, by the looks of it, where I grew up). I don't want to say the film is paranoid, or tackling a non-existent issue, or even inflating the seriousness of it. It just doesn't seem very accurate, and reminded me a lot of Focus (also with William H. Macy, coincidentally) in that way.

Nate P (es) wrote: A remarkably underrated Star Trek film, this movie has a fantastic performance from Patrick Stewart as Captain Jean-Luke Picard, and has a great send-off to William Shatner as captain Kirk.

Ken T (ca) wrote: Not the best of movies...but not the worst. Natasha makes it worth watching...Nice eye candy for the men"

Jacob S (jp) wrote: The worst sequel of Kong ever

joe b (au) wrote: one too many of everything...hehe this movie should be left on the shelf

Shaun I (gb) wrote: Y'know, for a cheesy '60's B-movie, this movie was actually quite decent! Once you look past the no budget "special" effects, it's a well directed, well acted thriller, with, surprisingly, some moments of real suspense. I wouldn't have expected it, but an enjoyable watching experience.

Himanshu G (ru) wrote: Great feel good romantic comedy with legendary songs..Dev Anand, Nutan and Om Prakash at their best. Though wish it had more vintage Delhi shots as in 'The Householder'.

Adam A (es) wrote: Emotionally well acted. and eerie directed, with a start that is frightening and emotinal, and an ending that is questionable.

Nate R (mx) wrote: I hadn't seen this in a long time. I thought that it was good, but I don't remember it being that good!

Leonel L (fr) wrote: based on true events

Carrington B (nl) wrote: A movie about a woman with dementia who happens to be Prime Minister. The movie focuses more on the emotion of the character played excellently by Meryl Streep. However lacked perusal of her achievements and failings.

jwasu r (es) wrote: Decent film for Samuel L. fans. I was really hyped to watch it since I picked it up at a yard sale and the seller told me it was REALLY good. I found it to be an adequately enjoyable way to while away the afternoon.