Madhouse

Madhouse

A horror movie star returns to his famous role after years in a mental institution. But the character seems to be committing murders independent of his will.

A horror movie star returns to his famous role after years in a mental institution. But the character seems to be committing murders independent of his will. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Madhouse torrent reviews

Karen C (it) wrote: A movie about a dysfunctional family... but who's family isnt? Great acting.

Johnson C (it) wrote: What the hell of this movie going on? totally lost on the age of the movie, seems to be 60's background, but it's not in some scenes.

Mark B (nl) wrote: Critics seemingly just didn't want to like this movie from the very get.....Before any screenings, it was quick judgements. Maybe it was due to the lead role being filled by an "outsider," Aguilera, who a widely known vocalist/pop singer & not an actress. I personally enjoyed this movie & catch it every time it comes on television, which is fairly often now. Christina, although the part didn't call for her to have to stretch herself too far, did a good job, given the role. She held the leading role well & I feel she was believable as the character. It's difficult when a person is solely known for a single attribute or talent & Christina has certainly put her mark in Hollywood as a musician/singer with longevity. Overall, I enjoy seeing this movie, repeatedly, it's entertaining & the cast is full of really good talent. The musical numbers are really good, the choreography, the songs, all good. It's worth watching.

Jarryd R (nl) wrote: hojhuijikjuipujkjuikjikjikjkjuioj

Darylanna K (es) wrote: I loved this movie as a kid and I still do now. It's ridiculous and fun. I will never care what anyone has to say about this movie because it is one of my guilty pleasures.

Sgt C (ag) wrote: (22%)Some decent car based action aside, this is pretty awful. Latifah tries, but the script is lazy, unfunny, and beyond impossible to care enough about to follow even with its very simple (stupid) plot. Fallon with his hugely annoying performance makes the movie almost unwatchable at times, and between the action there's really nothing to see here whatsoever besides the pretty models trying to act.

Tom H (au) wrote: a film about a psychotic killer stalking a female writer who he believes to be his dead mother reborn. Chris Sarandon plays almost the same character as he did in "Child`s Play". Victoria Tennant`s character lacked personality, and it was difficult to care what happens to her. but still, this was an ok low budget 80`s thriller.

Stephen R (es) wrote: I must say I really enjoyed this film. This is a great film.

King Lexie H (kr) wrote: um.. anyone who says they don't want to see it is a chump. Well alright anyone who wasn't a wee boy or girl in 1985 may not have the fondness for this film. But rest assured, there are some musical classics resting within this animated giant.

Al S (br) wrote: A laugh-out-loud great time. An endlessly hilarious and action-packed movie that's more fun than the original film. Clint and Clyde are back and delivering the laughs and heart that you love. Their isn't no other way but the fun way with this movie. It gets better every time i watch it. A wacky, wild and dazzlingly funny movie.

Nata K (us) wrote: super film! I can watch it again and again!

Pete B (nl) wrote: Not to bad as Frankie Avalon films go. Its strange thou that such a serious topic as the end of the world could have the vibe of one of his beach party films. Perhaps this is caused by the music or the way serious stuff seems to get only medium levels of emotion. Anyway still not bad as end of the world camping trips go.

Wesley J (it) wrote: In many ways this is the most unique of all the Frankenstein sequels. It's also on of the most unique Universal horror movies ever made. Amazing set design, great cast, great script, etc. A full length feature film!

Dan S (mx) wrote: Gotta love Powell & Loy!

Hugh R (fr) wrote: What do you get when you take a complete misunderstanding of the noir genre and combine it with action movie clichs and bad acting? You get "Bullet to the Head".James Bonomo is a hit man for hire who has all the personality and charm of your average brick. He is played by Sylvester Stallone who yawns out his lines like he's being paid to be as dull as possible. James and his partner Hank (Holt McCallany) are sent to kill a crooked cop who is blackmailing a crooked lawyer and his crooked business partner (Christian Slater and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje respectively). That's a lot of crooked folks and there are more to come. They complete the hit, minus the cop's hooker date, and turn up to receive their fee. Unfortunately for them their bosses don't want anyone who has come in contact with the evidence to remain alive so they send psychotic mercenary Keegan (Jason Mamoa of "Conan the Barbarian" reboot fame) to take care of them.So you have hitmen being hit by another hitman because the bosses don't trust the first hitmen. Why do the bosses trust the second hitman? How do they know he won't turn on them? Well, they don't. Spoiler: They should have thought this through better. But, then again clear thinking isn't really this movie's strong point.Enter Sung Kang as Taylor Kwon, a cop from D.C. investigating the death of his ex-partner, the crooked cop. Kwon has a smartphone with which he can gather seemingly omniscient information at the drop of a hat. Is there an app for that? Where do I sign up? Kwon uses his phone rather than his brain so often that he can't see the glaringly obvious plot devices until they are holding a gun to his head. Literally. It doesn't help that Sung Kang plays the part as though he just took an Ambien. To call his performance lack luster is an insult to lack luster.What follows from here is a dull slog through half understood noir film clichs, action movie clichs, and digital blood splatters. Someone needed to tell Stallone and company that "noir" doesn't mean "slow and boring" and that "action" needs a "reason" if we are to "care". Stallone's hitman seems about as torn up about his partner's death as he would over his T.V. breaking. He seems bored and unsure of what to do. This is not exactly a driving passion, but rather seems like he is thinking, "Hey, I got nothin' better to do. Might as well avenge somethin'". He is so disinterested in his quest that the audience has no reason to care either. The same goes for Sung Kang and his search for the killers of his partner. He says repeatedly that he just wants to arrest the "Big Guys At The Top" and that he didn't even like his partner, so there is no personal stake at all. Then why does he need James? Kwon provides nearly every piece of useful information with his godlike phone and he constantly whines about how James does things, so why doesn't he go it alone? Oh, right. This is a buddy cop comedy. Or is it a noir? Or an action movie? The constant narration leads us to think "noir", but the action is so pointlessly violent that we think "action movie". And the banter leads directly to "buddy cop comedy". So which is it? I have given up trying to figure out what their intent was and I think the director did, too.The plot holes are too numerous to mention, such as James saying his life is perfect for a hitman because he has "no kids, no family" and then within 15 minutes we are introduced to his daughter. And one idiot plot point after another rolls of the screen like so much liquid waste. Does the daughter have a tragic past? Is the hero cop a genius one minute and a drooling moron the next? Will the psychotic mercenary Keegan go insane for no apparent reason and challenge James to a fight using conveniently place fire axes? If you have seen more than one badly written action film in your time you know the answer to these questions and more posed by the film. Don't forget to keep an eye out for the amazingly obvious and totally unneeded romance subplot to complete your "crappy movie bingo" card.This is a movie without a brain, a cast, or a point. It is boring, nonsensical, and just plain lazily written. Even recommending it as a guilty pleasure would be to do the viewer a disservice. If you like guilty pleasure/cheesy action movies, find yourself a copy of "Commando" with Arnold Schwarzenegger and you will be far more entertained.

Rawballs B (gb) wrote: Actually it delvers scares... A sweet and cute stuff from a teen slasher movie...

Jason K (kr) wrote: Watching it right now. I have seen it many times, and every time it still sets me off. I get pissed cause it's so true. Sad thing is, I hear it's even worse now days.

Jason L (es) wrote: i think the critics are a little hard on this film, the leads put in good premformances. the ideas of future tech are well done and thought out. yes there are faults with the plot, instead of letting the story expand into a sci fi classic that could told the story after the end. they go the old route of turning a great idea into a another zombie horror flick. Maybe budget held them back. that all being said its a movie i watched several times for its centre performances good sci fi ideas. i thought Dennis Quaid was impressive in his role.

Siobhain M (ru) wrote: loved it. Don't see it straight.