You may also like
Mandhira Punnagai torrent reviews
Phil P (ru) wrote: "I got someone better!".Seemingly based on the 'Arkham' series of Batman games (I'd argue the best series of Batman available) 'Assault On Arkham' has Batman plastered over the poster, in the title but in reality this is a suicide Squad film. A tactical move to get more people to watch it? definitely. But those wanting a Batman tale will be disappointed, and while that's what I thought I was getting I still enjoyed it.It's a nice taster for the Suicide Squad movie next year and while it's not the same team of super-villains the dynamic (I'd imagine) will be similar. After losing 'The Riddler' to 'Batman', 'Amanda Waller' has a bunch of super-villains kidnapped and force-ably enlisted in a group called 'The Suicide Squad'. Named so as 'Amanda' sees them as dispensable, low lives and can at any point decide to explode their heads. All to retrieve a USB drive from The Riddler's Cain and something a little more dangerous. And yep it's in Arkham, hence the name!. It's a simple story they go in they get the Cain and leave. But it's the squabbling, the different dynamics between the characters that make it worth it. 'Deadshot' takes the leader role, 'Captain Boomerang' is constantly trying to undermine him, 'Harley' is just having fun etc..The cast is of villains is carefully chosen and even though iv'e only heard of the two of them it does a good job of getting a feel for them. Of course nothing in Arkham would be complete without the Joker or a jail escape. It interestingly changes the 'Harley/Joker' dynamic slightly with 'Joker' being harsher and more violent than usual and 'Harley' having a love/hate relationship with him. 'Batman' makes an appearance but is largely in the shadows only showing up to mix things up. When everything is in Arkham it goes a nice pace and feels like a crime caper but the lead up is a little slow and it's ending isn't a particularly great one - it's commitment to killing off characters is admirable (as this is definitely not for kids). After the weak(ish) character design of 'The Dark Knight Returns', 'Assault On Arkham' is more up my street. The characters all stand out from each other and the animation is slick and energetic. Particular highlights being a stylish fight between the squad and 'Batman' and a colourful and busy prison escape.'Assault On Arkham' is a little different to what we usually get from 'Batman' it's less a methodical story and more of a simple one with contrasting characters. I may not know who most of the Suicide Squad are but their infighting and personalties are what keep the film alive. It's also nice to see the 'Arkham' series of games (based on my personal favourite Batman Comic Book 'Arkham Asylum') universe being kept alive and hope we get more out of it. Preferably a Batman' focused one next time.
Amanda R (kr) wrote: I really e joyed this movie more than I thought I would
Gonalo C (ru) wrote: They really need to stop making movies like these. Its a generic new horror movie scheme everyone is following. Stupid decisions. Arguments. Crying. It's like.Seriously. Stop. It's annoying. It was suppose to be a road trip and before they even start driving. People start BITCHING! I rated this 35 minutes into the movie.
Hli L (au) wrote: Boris Vian's classic, extravagant and surreal love story gets an overwhelming screen adaptation by Gondry who spares no displays of expert stop-motion and intricate special effects. If sensory overload is your thing then look no further because plot and characters seem secondary here.
Jerome S (gb) wrote: I loved this movie. The storyline is very good and the cting is very well.
Marie (ca) wrote: Bachna ae haseeno charms viewers with colour, comedy and abundant Indian music as well as a few exciting twists.
Sinead B (mx) wrote: My reaction to Import/Export was multi-layered; while I _can_ appreciate it for the depressive-realist tone throughout and the not-so-far-from-the-surface pressing existentialist questions, it lacked some much-needed comic relief. Humour (albeit dark) in the face of misery and despair can be seen in many long-suffering ethnic groups; and is hence more-plausible than a consistent grim aura that unfortunately encompassed a potentially-great movie. Any "humour" that I happened to witness during the movie was discomforting--an interaction between the characters rather than the movie and its audience, which added a further sense of revolving darkness. I'm on the fence.
David S (it) wrote: In an attempt to recapture what the original created, Highlander: The Source is simply an insult not only to the franchise, but to the film industry. It seems the writer and the director haven't the skills to create a coherent and interesting movie. This film is like watching a music video with terrible acting and a completely irrational and nonsensical story. Stupidity is cast upon the ignorant watcher for viewing trash such as this. It is amazing how it took $13 million to create this tragedy.
Jacob B (us) wrote: While perhaps not something truly remarkable that's going to be talked about for years to come, Swordfish's talented cast, cool explosions and John Travolta's speech at the beginning of the film involving how the film industry is practically happy endings all the time make it a sporadically amusing film for what it is.
Robert M (kr) wrote: The conclusion to how it all started. We learn such things as the slightly "cowardly" General Grievous being the head of the droid army, discovering the chancellor as the Sith lord, the human clones during the clone war a set-up, and of course Anakin Skywalker becoming the one and only, Vader. I would have to consider this film the best out of the other two prequels. The movie ran along quite nicely, had lots of neat action, scenery and special effects as usual, and it greatly demonstrates how it all happened from the middle of the movie (the Sith lord looking more like himself) to the very end of it (Luke and Leia born and split apart).
Vanny B (nl) wrote: My fav hindi movie. About reincarnation.
Kaylen M (fr) wrote: Oh my god! So dumb. I totally just wasted an hour 1/2 of my time watching this stupid movie. The whole story, the ending, everything ridiculously stupid. I like Chris Egan, but this movie just sucked.
Ice R (ru) wrote: Very good 60s drama.
Andrew p (ag) wrote: I cry like a baby every time