Massacre in Dinosaur Valley

Massacre in Dinosaur Valley

A plane crashes in the Amazon jungle, and its passengers must battle their way through cannibals, slave traders, wild animals and murderous piranha fish to safety.

A plane crashes in the Amazon jungle, and its passengers must battle their way through cannibals, slave traders, wild animals and murderous piranha fish to safety. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Cannibal.Ferox.2.1985.ReComp(SweSub)Other3849699.78 MB

Massacre in Dinosaur Valley torrent reviews

Jeninne M (nl) wrote: It was so good, I was disappointed when it was over.

David C (us) wrote: his weakest offering to date

billy k (nl) wrote: Deacyed Evil I assume.

Bill N (it) wrote: good! pacino can do better !

Sanford R (es) wrote: Its a pretty decent movie

Bill S (ca) wrote: Includes some brilliant animation.

Archibald T (it) wrote: Agatha Christie had a terrible year in 1926. Her mother died, she began getting depressed and to top it all off her husband, Archie, admits that he's been having an affair. He leaves her during a brief altercation with Agatha after telling her about the affair. That very night she left. A note to her secretary mentioning that she was going to Yorkshire. She never makes it there and instead crashes into a tree after being distracted by a dog in the road.The car is later found, but not with her in it. This begins a massive manhunt to search for Agatha that doesn't get solved until 11 days later. Many rumors spread about of her committing suicide, but her husband Archie doesn't believe so and when questioned by authorities they see a man who doesn't seem all too worried about his wife.Wally Stanton is a newspaper reporter and an avid Agatha Christie fan. He loves her books and her as well. He becomes fascinated by Agatha's disappearance and wants to find her. She so happens to be found at a Spa, but under a different name. She uses the name of her husband's mistress, Nancy (or Teresa) Neele and plots revenge against her. The revenge, however, is more of a suicide attempt by which she tries to make Nancy out to be a murderer through an odd looking device that resembles the electric chair, but really isn't.Now, Agatha, may or may not be pretending at this point that she is someone else. She took a bump on the head from that crash and much speculation could lead you, the viewer, to think it must be amnesia. I'm not entirely certain if she had it or she knew what she was doing. All the more it's only for dramatic effect since it's really made up to begin with. Amnesia could be the realistic case, but the way it's presented here makes you think otherwise to the ever growing speculations that revolve around her disappearance in general.Wally is aware that it is Agatha and uses this opportunity to woo her and to grab a story out this weird situation. Agatha isn't aware of who she is and continues onward on her plot of revenge. The sappy aspects of Wally and Agatha don't really hold up well. They're romantic enough, but I always got a sneaking suspicion that Wally was involuntarily using her. The climax of the film is shocking. I don't mean that in a surprising way. It's just how Agatha becomes to be. Wally makes it in time for her to be saved and when she is returned back the people are a bit disappointed. I was too.It begins with a scrolling title explaining that what you're about to see is a fictional account of what might have happened when Agatha Christie disappeared. So, I guess that must mean that every thing else was made up. From Wally Stanton to Agatha being electrocuted to Agatha's revenge plot against her husband's mistress. I enjoyed the sophisticated way this film was directed. If I had to recommend this film, I'd recommended it for that and that alone. Hoffman does an okay job at being an actor playing what is obviously a fictional character parading around as a "love" interest.Overall, a slick and well paced film that jumbles between fact and fiction. Actually, it's mostly fiction.

Nicholas A (mx) wrote: Tense and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide

Charles M (us) wrote: Impressive and so fun to see the continuing emergence of Oscar Isaac.

Ola G (de) wrote: John Hancock (Will Smith) is an alcoholic indigent with superhuman powers, including supersonic flight, invulnerability, and vast super-strength. Even though he uses his powers to stop criminals in his current residence of Los Angeles, his activity inadvertently causes millions of dollars in property damage due to his constant intoxication. As a result, he is routinely criticized at the scenes of his destructive heroics by Angelenos and condemned by the news media. Hancock also ignores court subpoenas from the city of Los Angeles to address the property damage he has caused. Each additional crime he stops raises the level of enmity the citizenry has for him, and it isn't helped by the fact that they're all aware he cannot be restrained. When public relations consultant Ray Embrey (Jason Bateman) departs from an unsuccessful meeting pitching his All-Heart logo for corporations with useful resources that could be donated as charitable acts, he becomes trapped on railroad tracks with an incoming freight train. Hancock saves Ray's life, but he causes the train to derail and nearly injures another driver. Hancock is jeered by the other drivers for causing more damage, but Ray steps in and thanks Hancock for saving his life. Ray offers to improve Hancock's public image, and Hancock grudgingly accepts. Ray convinces the alcoholic superhero to permit himself to be imprisoned for the collateral damage he's caused and the significant outstanding subpoenas he's racked up over the years so they can show Los Angeles how much the city really does need Hancock. When the crime rate rises after Hancock's incarceration, the superhero is contacted by the Chief of Police. With a new actual superheroic costume from Ray, Hancock intervenes in a bank robbery, rescuing an injured police officer, subduing the armed robbers, and stopping the leader and mastermind behind the robbery, Kenneth "Red" Parker (Eddie Marsan), amputating his hand in the process to stop him from releasing the dead-man's switch on a detonator that would trigger the explosive harnesses the hostages are rigged with. After the rescue, Hancock is applauded for saving the hostages lives and preventing the bank robbery. The superhero becomes popular with the public once more, as Ray had predicted. He goes out to dinner with Ray and his wife Mary (Charlize Theron), who has previously shown great disapproval of Hancock, himself and his actions. During dinner Hancock goes into what he knows of his origins, revealing his apparent immortality and amnesia from eighty years ago. After Hancock tucks a drunken Ray in bed, he discovers that Mary also has superhero powers. He threatens to expose her unless she explains their origins. Mary meets Hancock the next day at his motor home on the outskirts of Los Angeles and tells him that they have lived for thousands of years with their powers, having been called gods and angels in their time; now in modern times they are known simply as superheroes. She explains that they are the last of their kind and that their kind are paired. Hancock needs to figure out the real truth and confront Mary about their apparent connection....The original screenplay was much darker. Apart from being a low-life, Hancock was supposed to be sexually frustrated because he couldn't have sex with a woman without killing her. The MPAA actually cleared a scene involving Hancock's explosive orgasm, but it was removed from the final cut because a test audience didn't find it funny. The tone was lightened considerably for a summer release aimed at a wide audience, but the MPAA gave the film an R twice before language and violence cuts resulted in a PG-13. Todd McCarthy of Variety felt that the film's premise was undermined by the execution. McCarthy believed the concept ensured the film was "amusing and plausible" for its first half, but that the second half was full of illogical story developments and missed opportunities. Stephen Farber of The Hollywood Reporter said that the opening established the premise well, but that the film came undone when it began to alternate between comedy and tragedy, and introduced a backstory for Hancock that did not make sense. He said it rewrote its own internal logic in order to pander to its audience. Stephen Hunter in The Washington Post said it had begun with promise, but that the change in tone partway through was so abrupt that the film did not recover. I agree to all this, as the first hour works about this down and out superhero (Will Smith is not 100% convincing in my book, but good enough as he has the goods to deliver in this sort of comical drama) with several comic scenes and a functional dark undertone plus the chemistry between Smith, Bateman and Theron is truly dynamic, funny and strong. Bateman is perfect as Ray in my eyes. The CGI or effects is not maybe top notch, but ok for being 2008, however as far as I know a second one is in development and I will expect much better effects then as a lot of things has happened on that side since the first one came out. As said the latter part of the movie isnt fully working, it feels rushed and not thought through. Theres something missing in the climax of the film in my point of view. I reckon "Hancock" had a great original idea, but the end result suffers partly from mediocre execution and a not fully developed script.

tara m (au) wrote: mom would probly like this

Tiddles M (jp) wrote: awesome film! must watch.