You may also like
Meno male che ci sei torrent reviews
Shirley H (mx) wrote: Actually helps to illuminate the somewhat confusing plot in the book. The dog is wonderful!
lukas w (it) wrote: What in the fuck did I just watch?
Frances H (ca) wrote: Great to see this flick again. When I first saw it when it came out, I didn't realize how many now familiar faces were in it. I still think that Ed Norton was a strange pick for King Baldwin.
Nicole J (us) wrote: Smart, Subtle and Ruthless A historically accurate and entertaining film, Robert Redford's Quiz Show is about the lies and deceit of reality television back in the 1950's when it first started. The movie follows NBC's quiz show "Twenty-One" and how the public discovered that the show was in fact rigged. The two main characters are Herbie Stempel, an awkward, Jewish contestant who is unbeatable but is pressured by NBC executives, Dan Enright and Albert Freedman, to lose to attractive and charismatic, Columbia professor, Charles Van Doren who come from a notable family. The plot progress with Richard N. "Dick" Goodwin trying to uncover the truth behind the quiz shows. At it's core the Quiz Show is an unflinching, remorseless examination of the American people. Charles Van Doren is willing to cheat in hopes of receiving attention from his father and when he fails to do so he settles for the attention of the American people. Herbie Stempel is socially inept, making him shunned from other that he was willing to cheat for fame and recognition. Recognition of the fact that he was very intelligent, intelligence which he prided himself on. Richard Goodwin is a naive, newly graduated law student who thinks that the law would bring justice to the unjust and corrupt system of reality television. Dan Enright and Albert Freedman are businessmen down to their core, selling a product. That product being reality television. For the reality television wasn't about providing recognition to those who deserved it but selling the idea of money to the american people. They knew people watched the shows for the money and not for the questions, so instead of making the show about knowledge they made it about gaining the most viewers b providing viewers with the most interesting contestants. The motives behind each of these characters makes them very real and relatable to the audience, making viewers care about them and the plot. The whole movie in general was very real, the setting of 1950s America was very accurate and besides a few minor details the events were accurate. In general, the actors did phenomenal jobs portraying their characters, most notably Ralph Fiennes rendition of Charles Van Doren and David Paymer portrayal of Dan Enright, but at times John Turturro's depiction of his character Herbie Stempel felt like a caricature. Paul Attanasio's screenplay is witty, smart, subtle yet ruthless, utilizes the power of foreshadowing and full of memorable dialogue. Despite it's failure in the box office, it's a critically acclaimed movie that is a must see for all.
Jordy N (jp) wrote: Underrated and misunderstood
Jos M (ca) wrote: Comedia de enredos sin pretenciones, para pasar el rato.
Jeff D (de) wrote: Treat yourself to a Vanilla Ice double feature of Cool as Ice & Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II. Thank me later.
David F (de) wrote: Most of my 3.5 stars are being awarded to the third of these three very loose adaptations of Edgar Allan Poe stories made by three noted post-war European directors, Toby Dammit directed by Federico Fellini who conjures the exact same atmosphere of hyper-intellectual psychological reflection that he did in his better known film 8 1/2. Very little of the original Poe material makes its way into these adaptations which, in the case of Toby Dammit, is a blessing, for it allows Fellini to playfully riff on his favourite themes: cinema, the Catholic church, women and television. The story involves an actor played by Terence Stamp flying to Rome to receive a Ferrari but the focus is on Fellini's circus, his snappy humourous dialogue, and clowning around. In the first part of this triptych, 'Metzengerstein', Roger Vadim creates an appealingly decadent atmosphere out of two feudal European estates while in the second, 'William Wilson', Louis Malle has Alain Delon and Brigitte Bardot to work with in a tale that Poe thought was about sensitivity and alienation but here seems to be more about cheating at cards. But it's the final part which makes this film worth watching for its Barthes references, its female devil, and its TV studio interview on the subject of the artist.
Bob E (de) wrote: Hillbilly's gone wild!
Brad S (ru) wrote: This film is based on an Agatha Christie novel and has been remade several times and inspired Several other films and TV shows. I liked it, and enjoyed the concept, but having seen several of the copies, the surprises had been ruined. Still worth checking out and looked excellent in Blu-Ray. Give it a try!
Private U (ru) wrote: The perfect murder? Dean Stockwell is great. A little long winded speech at the end by Welles kills a bit of the impact at the end still worth watching.
Philip J (br) wrote: Poor Cuba Gooding, Jr. He probably never expected his career trajectory would end up like this. At one point, Cuba Gooding, Jr. was the man in Hollywood. He was this high class kid, starring in some of the most well received movies coming out of Hollywood. He appeared in such movies as Boyz N the Hood, Outbreak, As Good as It Gets, and What Dreams May Come. Heck, in 1996, he even won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for his role in Jerry Maguire! Who could forget his memorable performance as pro football player Rod Tidwell, who utters one of the most quoted lines ever: "Show me the money!" The 1990s was a great decade for Cuba. I mean people respected Cuba. He was on top of the world and had everything going for him. His acting career potential was unlimited. Then the 2000s came, and Cuba Gooding, Jr. had several misfires. The dude starred in Boat Trip for crying out loud! Boat Trip! C'mon Cuba, what the heck were you thinking? For those wondering where did it all go wrong for Cuba's career, I blame Cuba going on that Boat Trip. I mean, Boat Trip was only one of the worst movies of like the last century. It makes Snow Dogs look like a masterpiece in comparison. Cuba Gooding, Jr. also played the lead character in Radio, and to paraphrase Kirk Lazarus from Tropic Thunder, Cuba went full retard, man. He should have never gone full retard. Ask Sean Penn. Cuba's star has since faded. He has made sporadic appearances in theatrical movies, but most of them were flops. Norbit? Daddy Day Camp? Does Cuba even read these scripts before signing on to star in these movies? I guess Cuba's agent wanted to show him the money so his agent ended up steering Cuba in the direction of B-movies. Somehow, somebody put in Cuba Gooding, Jr's head that he could become the next action hero if he agrees to star in several low-budget action flicks. But, I'm piling it on here. Cuba had made a few noble attempts at making a comeback. He had a decent small role in Ridley Scott's American Gangster. He also had a starring role in 2012's Red Tails, though Cuba spent the vast majority of his time in that movie smoking a pipe. I think he actually spent more time smoking that damn pipe than delivering lines. If ever there were an Academy Award for best pipe smoking performance on screen, it would go to Cuba Gooding, Jr. in Red Tails. Anyway, One in the Chamber is just one in a long line of direct-to-video movies starring our man Cuba. Here, Cuba Gooding, Jr. teams up with macho action veteran Dolph Lundgren in this sordid tale of assassins caught in the middle of a brewing Russian mob war. I know what you're thinking. Yup, it's the star of Snow Dogs and Daddy Day Camp playing a cold-blooded assassin. As far as B-movies go, One in the Chamber is just mediocre. It's action packed, but not really all that exhilarating. The script is pretty insipid. It's derivative of other better known movies. One in the Chamber doesn't exactly do much to enhance Cuba's resume. Cuba Gooding, Jr. stars as Ray Carver, an American expat living in exile in Prague. He makes a living as an assassin (otherwise known as a "fixer") and his clientele consists mostly of Eastern European crime lords. His job is to fix problems that these crime lords are having -- and he can easily fix most of their problems with the pull of the trigger of a high powered gun. Carver has been hired by the notorious Suverov crime family, led by boss Mikhail (Andrew Bicknell), to eliminate their rivals, the Tavanian crime family. The Tavanian family is headed by Vlad (Alin Panc). The two clans have held a reluctant truce for years, but that truce has been broken when the Tavanian family is accused of allegedly working with a Czech drug lord, which has resulted in the Suverov family losing business. During a sniper attack, Carver succeeds in killing most of the members of the Tavanian family. But he made one very grave mistake: he let Demyan Ivanov (Louis Mandylor) get away... So what does Demyan do? He hires Carver away from the Suverov family and now uses Carver to assassinate members of the Suverov clan. I mean, it's a conflict of interest and all but Carver just seems to go along with it. The Suverov family are none too pleased -- and who can blame them? I wouldn't be too happy either if the guy I hired to do an assignment for me ended up working for my competitor. But the Surveovs don't get mad, they get even. They go for the big guns here. They hire the most feared and legendary assassin in all of Eastern Europe. They say the man is a myth, but he's very much real. He's Aleksey Andreev (Dolph Lundgren). Also known as The Wolf. He doesn't think, he just does. He's Frank Sinatra "on steroids" (I couldn't make this up if I wanted to), and he has a great sense of fashion as he likes to wear fedoras and Hawaiian shirts. He plays chess in the park, restores cars from the 1970s, pinball machines from the 1990s, and if you pay him the right price, will probably kill anything that breathes. Quite a Renaissance man if I may say so myself. But even he has his limits. He has made it clear that no innocent party can be involved, he won't kill any women under certain conditions (no knives, but shooting them is fine with him) and he won't kill any children period, so he does have a shred of heart. The Wolf has one important rule as an assassin: don't use all the bullets in your gun, always save one in the chamber. Meanwhile, Carver spends his spare time following and stalking this random girl, Janice Knowles (Claudia Bassols). He simply can't approach her in person, introduce himself, and ask her out for a cup of coffee. Cause we all know that assassins are socially awkward. But there is a method to Carver's madness and there is a reason why Carver is so obsessed with this lady... Carver's actions have ignited a potential full scale Russian mob war. And now Carver finds himself at the crosshairs of both the Suverov family and The Wolf. When these assassins cross paths, bullets will fly... I think one of the problems with this movie is the lead actor Cuba Gooding, Jr. When one thinks of larger-than-life action heroes or dark antiheroes, Cuba Gooding, Jr. doesn't exactly fit either mold. Here, Cuba Gooding, Jr. is simply unbelievable as an assassin. Gooding's character is one of those assassins with a crisis of conscience. Beneath the cold exterior, he is torn with what he does. He's caught between the life of an assassin -- with all its attendant perks -- and a yearning to escape from that lifestyle with the mystery girl of his dreams. Carver even quotes the Bible during his voiceover narration (how original!) when he tries to be all existential. But Gooding's character is a clich, and an uninteresting one at that. Even if the character itself is clichd, good acting can develop an interesting character arc. Despite being a past Oscar winner, Gooding can't seem to channel his inner hitman. He tries to go for the stoic, brooding personality. But it doesn't work here. And he can't seem to convey the right emotions either. Whereas he supposedly has been emotionally through the wringer, he ends up looking simply bored and tired instead. And I don't want to rip on Cuba as he has shown in his past works why he is a talented actor, but here, he is not able to display the inner conflict his character is supposedly struggling with. In short, I simply could not buy Cuba Gooding, Jr. as an assassin. He just wasn't a good fit for this type of role. Dolph Lundgren fans on the other hand may actually find some things to enjoy in this movie. Lundgren has ample screen time and gets to do quite a bit. He doesn't have a glorified cameo; he gets to shine here. Lundgren gives a respectable performance and doesn't appear to be sleepwalking. Lundgren even looks like he is having some fun chewing the scenery as The Wolf. He carries a certain kind of swagger that makes bad guy pee in their pants. He delivers one-liners with a sense of confidence. He breaks bones while cracking a smile. His character has a pretty cool scene where he single-handedly beats up a bunch of bad guys with his bare fists and kicks. These people owe his client some money and he's determined to collect that money. He body slams people and with his sheer brute strength, even uses a table to knock somebody out. He then breaks several of a debtor's fingers in order to obtain information about where to get the money. Dolph Lundgren plays this role with a bit of enthusiasm. He almost salvages this entire movie. It's one of Lundgren's better performances in recent years. The two lead actors do have some interaction. Unlike many other B-movies, One in the Chamber at least makes good on its promise that Cuba and Dolph will appear on-screen together. They don't have the best chemistry, but there is some fun to be had when you see them in front of the camera. Both actors actually share a decent amount of screen time together and they even get a chance to fight each other on a couple of occasions. When Gooding battles Dolph Lundgren, Cuba even gets to show off his fighting skills, though it's obvious that Gooding is using a stunt double whenever his character has to use some more flashy martial arts moves. There is also a cool albeit brief knife fight between the two. One in the Chamber has a surprising amount of action and violence in this movie. There's even a decent body count. Dolph Lundgren's character takes out dozens of faceless enemies without so much as breaking a sweat. He makes it look so easy. Gooding's character is involved in plenty of action too. The beginning action sequence is quite impressive. Ray Carver takes out his targets from a distance. Stylized camerawork and editing presents the action from both Carver's vantage point and that of the bad guys as they try to find out who is thinning their numbers. This leads to a rooftop chase with Carver trying to narrowly escape the bad guys. One in the Chamber has its share of shoot-outs with plenty of rounds of ammunition being fired. This movie also has its share of brutal fistfights. Yet, the action sequences are directed in a way as to make everything appear listless. I think the problem with the action scenes is the lack of thrills. Despite Carver being outnumbered by the bad guys 10 to 1, there is hardly any doubt who's going to triumph. One never really gets the sense that Carver is in any real danger. The bad guys are very lousy shots too. There are marginal attempts to make this a deeper character study, particularly when it tries to contrast between the two assassins. One assassin clearly hates who he has become, while the other revels in his work and hardly shows any conscience. But both seem to recognize that they are not exactly saints. The script explores this contrast in a perfunctory manner. Another quality this movie is lacking is solid villains. The villains are weak and pathetic. Eastern European gangsters have a supposed reputation for being ruthless, but these guys are just boring. Animated cartoon villains are more threatening than these guys. The villains are just as hackneyed as their names. The film's production values get a passing grade and this movie makes good use of its Prague locales. But it seems a lot of B-movies these days are shot in Eastern Europe, ostensibly due to significant tax breaks. Ultimately, despite Dolph Lundgren's best efforts, One in the Chamber is another forgettable B-movie doomed to languish in obscurity. I can't really recommend this movie to anybody except for those who must see every Cuba Gooding, Jr. movie ever made. Yeah, I'm talking to you. I know you paid money to see Daddy Day Camp in theaters. I would also recommend this movie to Dolph Lundgren fans, who will get a kick out of his performance. In fairness, this movie is actually slightly better than a lot of direct-to-video movies out there. But it is still a mostly anemic feature. At best, it's a rental.
Kieran D (us) wrote: The movie itself I think was a good idea but I feel its been let down by the way it was presented. It just doesn't feel like it got going. Some moments in the movie are good but its then slowed back down by other scenes. Chicken Joe is useless in this movie he's only there to get Cody to the island so after that he's just boring and a general waste of time.
Nick G (fr) wrote: Incredibly boring I kept waiting for Seth rogen to be funny but it never happened