A disease carried by common cockroaches is killing Manhattan children. In an effort to stop the epidemic an entomologist, Susan Tyler, creates a mutant breed of insect that secretes a fluid to kill the roaches. This mutant breed was engineered to die after one generation, but three years later Susan finds out that the species has survived and evolved into a large, gruesome monster that can mimic human form.

A team of scientists genetically create an insect that stops the spread of a deadly disease, only to find three years later that something has gone terribly wrong!  Now, the insects are out to destroy their only predator, mankind. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Mimic torrent reviews

Jonathan C (it) wrote: Didn't like the pacing. The conflict arose, then got rectified far too quickly. Felt like a fair/decent extended episode from Justice League.

Antonio T (ag) wrote: Lo que ms molest al publico de la tercera entrega de Que pas ayer?, es que ya no se enfoc a la comedia sino a accion, drama y cierre de la trilogia. Habr dos momentos mximo que te harn reir, pero no se significa que sea mala la pelicula, aunque tiene ocasionalmente dialogo horrendo o en momentos muy predecible, no te aburrir y fue una buena decisin mostrar ese lado ms serio y dramtico de todos los personajes. Un digno cierre de la triloga de la cruda.

Tyler D (fr) wrote: This looks hilarious!

Miss B (it) wrote: I can see what the Directors tried to do... and that's the problem in a nutshell. The movie mainly covers flashbacks to various time periods and as they overlap, you'll get more and more confused with the plot. That is exactly where they want you; for the big punch line. Which is a let down... Would have been a good movie as a stand alone but then again, might have been too complex given the confused timeline and the many characters. Being the third of the trilogy, I expected action, twists, depth and an overwhelming ending. Only got the ending. :(

Mark D (gb) wrote: Lemmon and Mills are good together but the comedy falls flat, as does the silly subplots involving risque photos and the whole thing is way too long for what should be a little gem of a movie.

Fred V (ru) wrote: After coming close to shutting this film off merely 25 minutes in, I struggled through the next 40, only to shut it off for good 1 hour and 5 minutes into the 106 minute runtime of this disastrous film. Poor casting, bland humour, and a whole host of ridiculous scenes make this film excruciatingly boring to watch. It's hard to care about anything that's at stake, and the childish attempts at humour don't work when this film isn't trying to be like Johnny English (2003). Give this a miss!

Peter S (jp) wrote: This is a solid action revenge historical epic. I view this as a precursor to the also excellent gangs of New York. What can I say? The storyline line is thrilling. Ridley Scott's directing is top notch, the action is excellent and Russell Crowe gives a powerhouse performance in the lead role. I don't personally think it's the best movie of 2000, but I can understand why it won the academy award for best picture. Overall, a solid must see and it can also really inspire people.