Two friends try executing their 'get-rich-quick' plan by kidnapping their boss's daughter, but when the plan falls apart, they must scramble to fix the situation and repair their friendship. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Two friends try executing their 'get-rich-quick' plan by kidnapping their boss's daughter, but when the plan falls apart, they must scramble to fix the situation and repair their friendship.
You may also like
Mon Ami torrent reviews
Jonathan M (ca) wrote: 3 stars if you are a SCI-fi fan and 3.5 to 4 if you love anything and everything to do with Mars. There are lots of things that could be better and make this a 5 star, but it just misses on performances and a few plot items. Overall I loved this movie though (had extremely low expectations based on the low ratings. ) Again...if you love science fiction and Mars there is a lot to like here. Some of the other modern Mars movies that are rated much higher could learn some things from this show. I enjoyed Liev and Elias' performances the most. Kim character pretty good as well.
Cindy Y (jp) wrote: What a strange Polish view on the old west. Plenty of blood. Almost impossible to follow at times. Really interesting but it moves slowly. Val Kilmer is dead through the whole thing and yet on the DVD cover his picture was front and center.
Will W (es) wrote: the other best high times film top 5 ..d.o.a.
Jordan G (gb) wrote: A perfect film that loves paint as much as it's subject.
Matt H (de) wrote: Kind of sick thought to rent a Kid and the movie didn't do anything for me.
Tuomas S (br) wrote: Vhn jotenkin tnkk vaikka idea on ihan hyv ja Jack Warden mahtava.
antoinnette b (mx) wrote: an erotic movie. didn't know rourke looked hot in his younger years.
Robert M (ag) wrote: Quite an aggressive and yet fairly humorous portrayal of this event that happened in Brookland in 1972. It is certainly quite raunchy with the cussing for a 70s film. While a bit slow at times, it does have it's rare surprising moments.
Fabian R (de) wrote: escalofriante historia de horror de antologa, en la cual merece estar en mi bal.
Laara C (kr) wrote: Not a bad movie though, really liked the comedy and the musical. To me Jane Russell stole the movie, even though Marilyn Monroe was beautiful and captivating with her looks. Jane had the personality and looks as well. She seemed to be the one that had more fun and less focused on the money/diamonds. Which sometimes annoyed me a lot of Marilyn character which was a shamed because that is what the studio wanted her to be a ditzy female only worried about diamonds/money.
Rainer K (au) wrote: Never, I repeat, never, have I seen a film that was both as funny and smart as Ernst Lubitsch's To Be or Not to Be.Set in WWII Nazi-occupied Warsaw, it follows the adventures of a theater ensemble that gets involved with Polish underground activity.Carole Lombard plays the female lead Maria Tura in probably the best performance of an actress I've ever seen from this era. Strong female roles, where women not only function as accessories are rare in pre-60s cinema and she nails it.So does her in-film husband Jack Benny who is as narcissistic as it gets and believes he's the best of all Shakespearean actors (he can pull off a pretty convicing Gestapo officer and German double agent as well), but Lombard outplays even him.Anyways, the film won me over with the incredible amount of detail in dialogue and the whole production, starting with the Polish name signs in the first scene, up to the scene where an actor, posing as an assassin recites Shylock's monologue from The Merchant of Venice in front of a group of SS-soldiers and other actors posing as Hitler and his staff. There are a lot of scenes like that, and this is what made this film so wonderful.To Be or Not to Be challenges Chinatown for the best movie script I've ever seen, not only does it feature sharp dialogue and funny one-liners but so many twists and changes of perspective, it can only be attributed to the director's enormous skill that we don't get lost in it.I can't wait to see more from Lubitsch, I bet he has some more masterpieces in his resumee.
Paul D (jp) wrote: Sylvester revisits the actions movies of old with a style and plot that feels a quarter of a century too late than the year this film was released in.
Sam M (ru) wrote: The first film was terrific. It deserved a better sequel. Many ingredients for a great film are here, but there are just as many for a bad one. Overall, it's a shame a better end product didn't come from all this. It could have been a great film!
Hakeem J (ca) wrote: An oldie that was playing on TV, but definitely my favorite Dwayne Johnson movie to date. It's silly in it's plot, funny in it's absurdity, and an all round good ride.Christopher Walken as an antagonist will always garner my thumbs up.