3 brothers living in Singapore, each leading a different lifestyle. They discover the deeper meanings in life as tragedies unfold, with comedy & tears along the way. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
You may also like
Money No Enough II torrent reviews
Tina B (gb) wrote: Klart annorlunda, udda amerikansk film. Strlande! Se den!
Riley H (de) wrote: I laughed a few times. Would it be possible to combine strong female teenaged characters with a good movie?
Matthew C (mx) wrote: I'm trying not to fault this early 2000s, quirky comedy for being one of the first in a long line of quirky comedies (mostly of the indie variety) to utilize an endless list of cliches that still rears its ugly head to this very day. But I just can't shake this poor film from the Unflinchingly Derivative folder. Films like these push a very specific crassness to sweetness ratio that's just too polished and "studio" to reach anywhere near the quality and freshness of a There's Something About Mary or any number of Judd Apatow efforts. [No, I don't think fixing it is as simple as an R rating.]The cast does a fairly decent job despite the material overall. Philip Seymour Hoffman often stands out as the goofy "best friend" trope, though Stiller can be annoying as he tries way too hard to fill the stuffy, straight-laced, neurotic, Woody Allen trope.
vness L (au) wrote: im suprised you havent put the movie M on here
Samitha G (ru) wrote: An enjoyable movie...
Russ B (ca) wrote: 11/1/2014: An ok movie. A good cast and generally funny, but not any real laugh out loud moments.
Charles P (jp) wrote: At nearly two and a half hours, Husbands is a story without a story, depicting three men practically entirely in their very unhealthy friendship.
Craig C (de) wrote: Adored as a toddler, unwatchable forty years later. The musical that almost bankrupted Fox, ending the era of the Big Hollywood musical. Overlong and boring script and not one memorable song in the lot. And yet somehow this got a Best Picture Oscar nomination? This is MST3K quality through and through!
Carlos M (jp) wrote: A mind-blowing piece of work that represents a landmark in Cinema due to its fantastic boldness for the time it came out, making use of Freudian symbolism not only to take us in a dream-like surrealist experience but also to challenge the very conception of narrative.
Alex V (mx) wrote: Cheesy fun... always.
Dena S (us) wrote: i enjoyed the watch it's more of a movie i'd watch with my girlfriends
Sean C (mx) wrote: THE CGI is unwatchable and unacceptable given the time it was made and the fact that it was a sequel to a brilliant first effort. Just all in all a sloppy film.