Monsters in the Woods (2012) torrents full movies


Monsters in the Woods

A micro-budget movie crew treks into the wilderness to shoot horror scenes for their unsellable indie-drama. They soon find themselves in the midst of their own real horror movie, as they are hunted by a large group of creatures.

Monsters in the Woods is a excited movies torrent of J. Horton. The released year of this movie is 2012. There are many actors in this movie torrents, such as Glenn Plummer, Lee Perkins, Linda Bella, Edward Hendershott, Claudia Perea, Blaine Cade, Gladys Otero, Ashton Blanchard, Paul Misko, Richard Raad, Hilliary Barbour, Adam Brooks, Darnell Campbell, Vincent Cusimano, Ernest Dancy. Movie' genres are Horror. This movie was rated by 2.2 in This is really a good movies torrent. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 96 minutes. FapDe is funny uploader, he is very proactive. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Awesome', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are visitors? ChimTo is the best. I can't fight my iPhone screen. Enjoy this movies torrent and share to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

They soon find themselves in the midst of their own real horror movie, as they are hunted by a large group of creatures. A micro-budget movie crew treks into the wilderness to shoot horror scenes for their unsellable indie-drama

Monsters in the Woods torrents

Monsters in the Woods full movie

Monsters in the Woods2012 torrent

Monsters in the Woods torrent, Monsters in the Woods movie torrents, download Monsters in the Woods full movie, Monsters in the Woods2012 torrents, download Monsters in the Woods2012 torrents, watch Monsters in the Woods movie, Monsters in the Woods englishsub, free download Monsters in the Woods movie, movie Monsters in the Woods torrent

Download   Monsters In The Woods 2012 DVDRip Xvid UnKnOwNDVDRip5230968.91 MB
Download   Monsters.In.The.Woods.2012.DVDRip.XviD-UnKnOwNDVDRip3443968.91 MB
Download   Monsters In The Woods 2012 DVDRip Xvid UnKnOwN.DVDRip3339968.91 MB
Download   Monsters In The Woods 2012 DVDRip XviD-UnKnOwNDVDRip4635968.61 MB

You may also like

Users reviews

Agung W (gb)

biReview. Not the best movie, but this film offers a lot of interesting things and a pretty good visual

Alex A (ag)

Some research may help me appreciate it more, but as of right now, Vertigo is a beautifully shot, well acted, at times charming and hypnotic noir thriller that somewhat left me feeling indifferent for two thirds of its run-time. Hitchcock undoubtedly did a great job in giving Vertigo a surreal feel through its cinematography. I could say I was bored by Vertigo, but simultaneously, not knowing what Hitchcock was trying to convey may have led to that boredom, which wore off in the third act where the big plot twist was revealed and the love story deepened

Alexander W (gb)

Somewhat contrived, but still smoothly tragic - almost too smooth

Alison J (us)

Scott in "The Hospital" instead, or another film in which he truly bothers to act. Watch George C. Unintentional comedy, and a very cliche-driven boring one at that

Allix D (gb)

The bar scene was a nice added touch. The various rain scenes could not have been done better. Its a gloomy film but beautifully filmed. I was hooked on this film, almost hypnotically

Ashley A (br)

Campy as hell, but really entertaining. Aliens love TV

Darren C (es)

pray British movies do better than this attempt from now on!. If you want to watch a better movie than this, watch Crank, The Warriors and Adulthood since it's those movies combined together. Teenagers will probably love this movie but I doubt adults will like it. I really wanted to like this movie because I thought the idea was brilliant but unfortunately, I was very disappointed with this monstrous mess. Shank is a good idea and, in the hands of somebody like Noel Clarke who had written Kidulthood and Adulthood, could have been a great movie but in the end, it was dull, boring in most parts and offers nothing new. Another thing Shank didn't have was a decent script, the lines were very lazy and didn't aspire or mean anything bar a couple of scenes. This is because there were some scenes including a dog fight with computer-game beat-em-up energy bars (you don't see the dogs fight, just spectators screaming at the camera) and a confusing Grand Theft Auto-like scene when Junior steals a BMX. Shank should have been serious, what with the story and the messages but there were a few things in the movie that took the seriousness away. The direction wasn't really great either, the whole movie just felt like a feature-length music video (well, it is directed by music video director Mo Ali, what do you expect?). The acting isn't terrible but it is quite bad, especially Kaya Scodelario which came as a surprise considering she's a good actress in Skins. Adam Deacon and Michael Socha do a couple of entertaining scenes as their characters Kickz and Craze but other than that, the rest of the cast doesn't bring much to the screens. The cast of Shank aren't the best actors in the world and they don't do the best job with their characters. This is supposed to be Broken Britain when gangs are extremely violent and killing people, you'd think you get the picture without him telling us they're mean. Another thing that annoyed me about Shank was when Junior introduces characters, he'd always say they're tough, mean or psychopaths. what's wrong with the letter S? Is it against the law to use S on the end of names? Personally, changing Kickz to Kicks looks better to me. . . Also, the gangs were named a bit ridiculous as well: Slaughter Gurlz, Paper Chaserz. Junior is alright but Rager? Kickz? Tugz? Craze? Whisper? They sound a little bit childish. While we're on the subject about the characters in this movie, the names given to them are terrible and sound a lot like nicknames a ten-year-old would give to look tough. One minute they're saying they don't want to stand and fight and the next, they're threatening other gangs and dog fighting. Also, it seems that they can't make up their minds whether they want to be violent or not. Yes they may have did one or two things that the characters did that made you laugh a little but other than that, you weren't bothered about any of them and they remain unlikeable throughout the movie. The characters in Shank were just uninteresting, everything about them was unlikeable. This movie is basically the Daily Mail reader's worst nightmare. It just felt like an excuse to make a movie involving teen gang violence, stealing, drugs and sex. That was when the movie started to go downhill. That is until Tugz, the leader of a rival gang, stabs Rager, the leader of The Paper Chaserz, and Junior wants to kill Tugz. Shank starts off okay with Junior narrating about how tough life is on the streets of 2015 and how he's part of a non-violent gang known as The Paper Chaserz and how his brother, Rager, and his other 'brothers' don't condone the 'postcode war'. Let's start with the plot, it's very thin and has been done loads of times before and done much better, you only have to watch Kidulthood or Adulthood as evidence to this. Shank had a brilliant idea and it was interesting that it was a British gang culture movie set in the near future but everything about it was just terrible, from the acting to the directing. So the movie is set in 2015 and the gangs have taken over, the story revolves around Junior who witnesses his brother Rager being murdered by Tugz and so he goes out on a vengeance mission to find Tugz and kill him. While the movie questions you to ask yourself "what if this decision was made and this happened" and tries to send strong messages about anti-violence and such, it fails to do so and succeeds in doing the opposite, just like 1 Day. The idea of Shank is a great one and it could have been a brilliant gritty movie but it's executed very poorly. Have you ever heard of the phrase "All the gear, no idea"? This film is the definition of what it means

David D (jp)

Recommended. Told through the lives of four protagonists. An insight into humanity, personality, psyche, society, life, consequence, emotion, coincidence, experience

Dwayne R (au)

Good acting. Religious undertone appropriate for the characters was not obnoxious. A good mystery with a few loose ends

Lavender R (nl)

Still a good movie though. I did not like it that much. It wasn't my favorite, really