Muertos de risa

Muertos de risa

Nino and Bruno are two comedians who reach the heights of success with their duo act, turning them into huge TV celebrities. However, the hate between them grows as fast, and as much, as their fame.

Nino and Bruno are two comedians who reach the heights of success with their duo act, turning them into huge TV celebrities. However, the hate between them grows as fast, and as much, as ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Muertos de RisaOther58411018.68 MB
Download   1999 - Muertos de risa_xvid.aviOther2842683.97 MB

Muertos de risa torrent reviews

Aiden T (jp) wrote: I've been waiting to say something about this movie, which only notable quality is that it ends at some point. . .It seems that I live among major Adam Sandler fanatics, everyone loves Adam with the exception of my uncle. And, it is true that Adam had a good movie phase in his life, but now we've hit the dark age, in fact, we've been in the dark age for a long ass time, and this movie seems to capture everything that makes me hate Adam. Everywhere from the piss-poor acting and humor to the sound of his voice fills me with unfathomable rage.The worst part is that Adam knows that he can get away with putting no effort in, because idiots and children will still supply him with millions of dollars. Adam understands that no effort is necessary because he knows that a giant portion of his fanbase consists of fucktards and children, this is nothing but proof that Adam is a piece of shit. . .This movie is nothing but a shitstorm, it's fucking stupid. . . 1/2 star. . .

Layla W (nl) wrote: It's gray. I feel like a lot of people hate this movie simply because they're cheating. But this movie is about the gray, the complicated, it's about life. The acting is phenomenal, the editing and cinematography is very interesting. All in all the story telling and performances are intoxicating and like nothing I've seen before. I can't take my eyes off the screen no matter how many times I watch this film.

Lau K (es) wrote: Speaks for transsexuals and it does a great job!

JASON W (au) wrote: SEAN BEAN IS AN IDIOT PROS- THERE IS A SEX SCENE IN IT NEG - WHAT A LOAD OF DRIBBLE

Carlos I (jp) wrote: Brilliant! Drags out a little much, not something you'll watch repeatedly. But this is an extremely impressive work of art.

Jilie L (ca) wrote: i like the comesy at first.. till the half part of the movie..

Ross C (gb) wrote: George recommends, but says it's difficult to watch.

Lisa M (fr) wrote: Amazing performance by Robert Carlyle.

Matthew L (br) wrote: Beowulf is pointlessly violent and just downright boring. Don't waste your money.

Jenn M (ca) wrote: a great example of the marketing of a serial killer. really sad

J K (gb) wrote: Talk about being type cast. Robert Newton always played a pirate.

Koti S (ca) wrote: Well, let's say that the movie had it's problems. It's big problems. Most of the time, it was only unnecessary Melodrama, which sometimes really annoyed the shit out of me. I don't want to see emotions and other boring stuff in a fucking Frankenstein movie, I'm here for the horror, the scientific aspects and the interesting thought behind it. And the good thing is: I could also see alot of that in this movie, which atleast satisfied me after the not really that believeable romance scenes. I admire the movie for how near it is to the novel, and the fact, that it isn't comperable to these stupid clich films that most of the times don't have a single little bit in common with the original masterpiece. I liked the fact that the "monster" looked realistic, you could still see that it once was an human being, and that the Doctor wasn't one of these overloaded insane geniuses who have a totally over the top design, with their disabled assistent Igor right on their side. It seems alot more real like in said films. I didn't like many of the characters, well I don't expect much of a Frankenstein's movie anyway, but well, here you had alot to deal with the characters, and you know.. they were all boring as hell. Only the monster gave you a few smiles, because of how cute it was acting all the time, and hell I wish I could know if that's actually a good or a bad thing. I called the monster Herbert and got really attracted to it, unlike to all the other characters... but you should be scared of it right? Ooops.... But well I like Herbert so much, I will overlook that fact. The next big problem is, the logicial issue. Well, in a novel where a corpse was brought back to life, I don't expect much logic to be honest. But here I could see alot of plotholes, the monster for example knew many things, which it couldn't know if you look at the plot closely enough. Or even if, we didn't saw it, is it that hard to show this to us? The family was also fucking creepy, I felt like in a TV commercial for some outdoor stuff at the mountain scene. It wasn't really believeable, more like a false paradise to me. In the university it seemed a little bit too harsh, and at home a little bit too friendly for that time period. But well, the time setting was still pretty well handled if you ask me. I also admire how balanced the background places were, not too much of the castle, not too much of the university, I could make the list go on, and they always knew when it was the right time to make a change of place. It had a very good visual content in general, my eyes liked what they saw when looking at the landscapes. The beginning and ending scenes were simply epic. this Review may Sound more harsh than it should, but I actually really enjoyed this movie. Sure, I mentioned enough Problems for others to hate it, but I personally know how to appreciate it.

Rendan L (de) wrote: A near endless onslaught of boring action, flat characters, mind numbing vid, and a non-existent story. Grade: D+

Scott R (nl) wrote: A warm biopic with a dynamic Cagney Performance, that makes this a must-see