Mummy's Dummies

Mummy's Dummies

Set in ancient Egypt, the stooges run a used chariot lot where they unload defective chariots on unsuspecting customers. When they gyp the head of the palace guard, they're brought to the palace to be executed, but instead become royal chamberlains after curing the King's toothache. When they recover some tax money stolen by a corrupt official, the King rewards them with marriage to his daughter. After getting a look at the ugly crone, Moe and Larry select Shemp to be the groom.

Set in ancient Egypt, the stooges run a used chariot lot where they unload defective chariots on unsuspecting customers. When they gyp the head of the palace guard, they're brought to the ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Mummy's Dummies torrent reviews

Anna D (ru) wrote: This movie is really excellent. I especially liked Bae Yong Joon in the role of Jo Won, The aristocratic, womanizing playboy. Although this was decidedly different from his regular roles, he still played this character with his usual meticulous, perfectionist's attention to every nuance and subtlety possible in his portrayal. I had never seen the rest of the cast in any other roles, but they all did an excellent job with their characters, as well. I have been a fan of Bae Yong Joon for some time now, but this role was a definite departure from his usual parts; though not an unwelcome one. Kudos, Bae Yong Joon ssi!!! Anna

Laryssa C (de) wrote: Frankly, I thought this was the worst thing ever.

Eric W (br) wrote: If I had unlimited resources, the first explicitly White Nationalist movie I would produce would be a dramatization of the corrupt and cynical way in which the inner party dominated racial extortion coalition operates. It would vividly show how sexual vice is used to control media celebrities and politicians, how violence is used when necessary, and perhaps most important, how the constituent racial and ethnic groups in this coalition all use each other and basically hate each other. But miraculously, an outer party liberal - Robert Redford - has produced it for me. It is called ?People I Know.? And it is the only truly explicit White Nationalist movie in existence. Braveheart may come close, but it is a Scottish nationalist movie - ardently separatist in its operation - which although uniting Scottish and Irish separatists in a uniquely modern and un-historical way - still involves fighting between groups of Christian Whites. "People I Know" is an overt and explicit attack on the racial extortion coalition. In some respects, it is similar to ?Eyes Wide Shut?, but is much more explicit. The average soccer mom would miss entirely the ethnic driver behind the system of social control revealed in ?Eyes Wide Shut.? The word "Jew" pops up in the middle of "People I Know" and is used with increasing frequency through the climactic conclusion. You even get to see an inner party cabal in action - complete with billionaires, media barons, a Rabbi and bands of armed izzy bodyguards. It is available for rental at Hollywood video (and I assume, Blockbuster) and available for sale on EBAY for from $7 to $15. The protagonist of the movie, played by Al Pacino, is a public relations crisis manager specializing in covering up scandals for movie stars and politicians. He is an ?old school? inner party ?civil-rights? liberal. His passion and his cause is setting up a fund raising dinner to raise money for the legal defense of some Haitian black illegals threatened with deportation. He gets a call from his one remaining client, a movie star (played by Ryan O?Neil) to bail out a young starlet/prostitute who managed to get herself arrested. It turns out that the young starlet was on a mission for the actor (who wants to run for a U.S. Senate seat) to infiltrate and photograph the goings on at a super model pleasure palace run by an inner party billionaire named Scharansky for the purpose of corrupting and then controlling politicians (lowering their cost and increasing the predictability of their votes). The actor wants the film because Scharansky is supporting some other candidate for the Senate seat he wants, and the actor needs the goods on Scharansky?s pleasure palace in order to force Scharansky to shift his substantial support and money to his own campaign effort. Unaware of all this, Pacino?s IP character visits one Reverend Block, a black leader in Harlem to get him to attend the fundrasing dinner - at which point the hostility between black and inner party surfaces explicitly. He next visits Scharansky for the purpose of persuading him to attend the fund raising dinner for Haitian immigrants, and here we are informed that Scharansky could care less about Haitian immigrants, hates Reverend Block - who he accuses of calling the IP ?hooked nosed devils? - and desperately wants to know where the young actress? ?toy? containing the incriminating pictures might be. Pacino?s character tirelessly tries to convince people to come to his fundraiser, and despite the fact that none of these liberals cares about Haitian immigrants, and almost all say they will not attend, in the end every one of them attends because of the opportunity to work the rest of the crowd for money, influence and glamor. The cynicism at the party - scratching one another?s eyes out in private conversations while striking happy, multi-culti poses for the camera is quite revealing, juxtaposed as it is with old photographs of 1960's civil rights marches and pictures of MLK delivering his famous IP ghosted speeches. While it is always hazardous to speculate about the subjective intentions of the producer, I suspect that these photos of the 1960s civil rights era were intended to shame a liberal audience into rejecting the cynicism and elitism of modern multi-culturalism and embrace the ?old idealism? of the cause. But when viewed objectively, the 1960's civil rights movement is made to appear equally cynical by its juxtaposition with the attitudes and behavior of its current standard bearers. When the movie ends, I am left sitting on the sofa wondering exactly how and why such a movie could ever be made in the first place. It is a clear threat gesture. The film played only in a few ?art houses? in New York and Los Angeles before being released on DVD. While expensive acting talent was employed, there was essentially no ad budget, and the public at large is completely unaware of this film?s existence. It looks like Redford and his backers (the outer party faction in the racial extortion coalition) has been angered by the Sharanskys of the world and has produced this movie as a warning shot across the bow, so to speak. It is a frank confession that the racial extortion coalition is a fragile one, and that while the blacks have been unhappy with their subordinate role for many years, the appearance of this film tells me that the outer party liberals have now joined them. Buy a copy and enjoy.

Chelsea G (mx) wrote: good movie! kinda cute!

Timothy S (gb) wrote: John Singleton is a man with a lot to say, and with "Higher Learning", he tries to stuff it all into one movie. His primary focus is racism, but he also throws in subplots concerning women's rights and date rape, and it's just too much to cover in one two hour movie. Singleton is a passionate, prolific writer, and there are some great moments of authenticity here, such as the white woman nervous to be alone in an elevator with a strange black male and the way a confused loner is easily seduced by a white supremacy group. And unfortunately, the violent tragedy that concludes the film has become all too believable in today's society. However, on the whole, the picture is terribly shallow filled with stereotypes and it fails to offer any real insight into its subject matter. Spike Lee honestly said pretty much everything that needed to be said on the subject with "Do The Right Thing", and this constantly plays like a weak retread. A lot of it feels genuine, but in the same breath I must also say that nearly as much feels exaggerated just to make a point. Or maybe it's just that people have come a long way in the short time since the film's release. Of the ensemble cast, Michael Rapaport stands out as the loner who joins a Neo Nazi group. His character is obviously complicated and Rapaport convincingly portrays a man who just wants to be accepted, but the film pretty much lost my respect in the scene following his rampage. Watching the security guards beating up on the innocent black kid while letting the shooter escape left me incensed. Singleton had pounded his message home enough by that time. That was just overkill. "Higher Learning" is loaded with good intentions, but only some of them are realized. It's a valiant effort that is only marginally successful.

Zaar D (mx) wrote: Dolph Lundgren...GAG...cough

Ryan B (jp) wrote: Pretty much the greatest movie ever. If you liked Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, check this one out.

Gareth D (ru) wrote: Not bad, not amazing. A good performance Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Scarlett Johansson save a fairly shallow movie about porn and masturbation. I feel like Julianne Moore's character could have been so much more.

Paul D (gb) wrote: I thought that the first half of this movie was actually quite good! However, not long after that it kind of slips into snoozeville. Still, it is a fun enough way to kill a little bit of time. It's not one of the great zombie movies, but it's not the worst either.