Murder!

Murder!

When a woman is convicted of murder, one of the jurors selected to serve on the murder-trial jury believes the accused, an aspiring actress, is innocent of the crime and takes it upon himself to apprehend the real killer.

A juror in a murder trial, after voting to convict, has second thoughts and begins to investigate on his own before the execution. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Murder! torrent reviews

Michael M (nl) wrote: A suspenseful thrill ride throughout. Full of humorous satire and homages to the exploitation movies of old. A brilliant horror flick. (89%)

Heather B (kr) wrote: I like Mia Kirshner but this film is pretty dull. The old cliche of rich spolit brats corrupting the poor, naive girl.

Caroline P (jp) wrote: Such a stupid movie that's way more entertaining than it has any right to be

Bailey S (us) wrote: Very Good Movie Very Exciting Very Good Ending

Debbie P (ca) wrote: Cluadette Colbert plays an American woman in a Japanese concentration camp in the East Indies during the second world war. Fine performance by Colbert.

stefano l (mx) wrote: Very brilliant comedy. It's old, and, also if I have to admit that I was very tyred when I watched it, I have to say that I felt in the last 20 minutes. Anyway, it's one of the best examples of satire that I ever saw. Every comics should whatch this when they start to think of a new, stupid, useless comedy.

James H (ca) wrote: 6.5/10. I realize that in 1939 the threat of Nazi?s was a serious and imminent one, but this film does go a bit too much to the extreme. Edward G. Robinson is an asset and does a fine job. It is more of interest for it?s historical significance than it is as a film, but the story isn?t a bad one and it?s quite fascinating.

Rob M (nl) wrote: A bit melodramatic for today but still a great picture. Special effects are fantastic for 1927.

Michael D (de) wrote: I hate this movie. It might be Harry Connick Jror something else intangible, but this movie is garbage

Joshua L (nl) wrote: Pretty dope action film

William C (us) wrote: Rating-3.5/10Hard Target is an action movie, or more of a cat and mouse game really containing much violence and Wilford Brimley. Now this is the kind of movie you find late at night on TV, and many will go and watch it, it seems on the outside a good action thriller directed by a known director and starring an action legend. The only problem for me was, it isn't very good and that action legend isn't either.Jean-Claude Van Damme is that action legend and for me he is poor here, his character works in the story well though and if watched in the right way, his performance can be ignored. The plot as said is like a cat chasing a mouse, expect the mouse is a human in New Orleans and the cat or cats should I say are the very rich paying to chase them down. A unique take on an action movie but so unrefreshing that I can't give it credit for having uniqueness here.The director I mentioned is John Woo who's first ever American movie is actually well done, but only from him. With a poor script and acting and a plot that does hardly any favours, this is one movie where I feel kind of bad for Woo. He as I say does it nicely, he seems to know what he wants from the actors but they don't pay him back, the villains of the show are the real star actors with Lance Henriksen and Arnold Vosloo being the best, not great for the bad guys to outshine the good.I'll give the film credit where it's due, and it deserves it in terms of the stunts and choreography it has, Van Damme does excel with his high leg kicks and powerful head smashes, but don't worry, the violence isn't too crazy for those who dislike it. The one thing that really again hurts this movie is the editing, the strange camera shots then coupled with edited shots of people, it makes the action scenes seem like some crazy movie that makes no sense, or maybe that's what it is possibly.Whatever your view on action films there is no denying this is not how to do them, Woo gives it a go as I said and does it well, but problems hamper this throughout. It's the kind of movie that I have come to expect though I mean there aren't many action thrillers similar to this that actually turn out good, even the best of them are usually only average. This I feel just needed a bit more heavy action, more fighting but with less insane death defying stunts that make this even more hard to believe. I think it is crucial John Woo is not remembered in years to come for films like this, and to be fair same with Van Damme, both can do much better.Overall I felt it is a bad movie as you might guess, but it isn't awful and not by quite a bit. It's a piece of film where you can watch it and not be too bothered by it, you won't finish with it and decide to smash things in anger about it, but you may just feel this should be more clinical. A big shout out to the man in my first paragraph Wilford Brimley, makes an appearance albeit for not too long but he is funny and his accent and jokes make the the movie kind of more fun than dark in his certain moments.