Near Dark

Near Dark

A mid-western farm boy reluctantly becomes a member of the undead when a girl he meets turns out to be part of a band of southern vampires who roam the highways in stolen cars.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:94 minutes
  • Release:1987
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:explosion,   star,   murder,  

A small-town farmer's son reluctantly joins a traveling group of vampires after he is turned by a beautiful drifter. Along the way he must decide between his new love of the vampire and the love of his family. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Near Dark torrent reviews

Leong C (jp) wrote: Good effort by Oliver Stone, supported by JGL's fine performance...

Atul R (kr) wrote: I didnt like the movie. When Ayesha Takia first came in the Bollywood i thought she would be one of the promising actress. But past movies she was awful like KYA LOVE STORY HAI. Arshad Warsi tries to be funny but fails. Ajay is ok. Irfan Khan is much better in his usual movies. Comedy is not for him. Only different in this movie is, its Comedy and Thriller. But then we had that type of movie Such as MASTI.

John Eric D (gb) wrote: A very well made Korean western flick with over the top fast paced action sequences and good execution overall. It has all the eye candy with its promising cinematography but then it didn't impress me in terms of a good storytelling. Too much over the top action, too much mess.

Megan M (ag) wrote: I what to see that movie i have 2 of the American girls at home and I have a lot of the books

David F (es) wrote: The characters in this movie were GREAT (Imogene Poots's character and her story especially), but the plot could have used some work. The film had a solid first half, but then it lost it's way in the second half.6/10

Bryanna R (br) wrote: Who else is so idiot and ducking geek like me who got the movie by heart? :-) And all movies #Jayandsilentbob too? :-)

Ida K (mx) wrote: This movie was so realistic that it was painful for me to watch! Kudos to the kind nurse and her friend at the end. The acting was great but emotionally, I don't think I can handle watching this again!

Jay B (de) wrote: While Glover and Pesci play well together, 'Gone Fishin' never escapes the standard goofball / buddy comedy formula. All we're offered is two aging actors falling down a lot and stumbling into crazy predicaments... an easy view, but forgettable.

Peter P (gb) wrote: Ferris, say it ain't so.

Phillip G (au) wrote: A Good Insight Into Two Very Different Perspectives and Situations During Conflict. Good Performances by Damon and Washington Make This Movie.

Paul C (ca) wrote: Only one of the worst films i have ever sat through - a third-rate re-hash of the Terminator franchise with amateur acting and some unbelievably poor SFX. Watch only if drunk!

Nilesh J (jp) wrote: A movie made to focus on a super-star in his prime. It is easy to see why it must have done well with the viewers back then. However, the entire story looks too soft and unfocussed in a different era.

Robert L (fr) wrote: a sci-fi classic. the premise is a bit ridiculous now, but wasn't then and it's an interesting look at the angst people in the 60s felt about atomic bombs. Works as a romance as well.

David J (jp) wrote: "In the Loop" is a sharp, funny, potty-mouthed political satire.

Kelly G (es) wrote: Open Grave is not your traditional zombie movie. It shared similarities more with 28 Days Later. The zombies were just crazed, infected living people which gave it sort of a realistic feel. I found it to be a great psychological thriller as well. Definitely worth a peak at.

Calum R (gb) wrote: In an era where science-fiction survival tales are becoming a popular occurrence - with 'Interstellar' last year, and 'Gravity' the year before - writer Andy Weir and sci-fi connoisseur Ridley Scott team up to craft a complex tale that is carried by a single character, that character being Mark Watney, played fantastically by Matt Damon (Hollywood's biggest calamity, who requires being rescued... again).As the film tees off, we are instantly given a first-person view of the dangers of Mars and the fight for survival each astronaut is living out each day on the planet's surface, that is until their emergency evacuation - but nope, even Damon couldn't do that right. Abandoned upon the desolate surface of Mars after being presumed dead by his crew, Damon must do all he can to endure the martian environment. One huge thing I admire about this film's plot, is that it doesn't care about the intellectual level of its audience, as the quote above states so well: it'll science the shit out of them. It's such a complex and well-executed premise that on paper seems nothing more than a impossible feat to pull off.Technically this film is stunning, the cinematography, the CGI, the production design, all utterly gorgeous, and according to the Golden Globes, it's one of the best comedies of recent years too... yeah, sure. Admittedly the tongue-in-cheek humour does add a more fresh appeal to the film, making it a little more unique than previous sci-fi adventures, it piles on layers of thrills, emotional value and complex character development to create one of the finest science fiction films of recent years.

Brad W (ca) wrote: Top Gun with helicopters. That's all you need to know. If that trips your switch, then watch away brother (or sister).

Jeff B (au) wrote: No, the women-in-prison films generally didn't have sequels, they just recycled the same actors and plots under different names.