Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? (2009) torrents full movies


Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted?

The biggest names in stand-up. The wildest live audiences. The most outrageous, uncensored comedy.

Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? is the best movies torrent of Nick Swardson. The released year of this movie is 2009. There are many actors in this movies torrent, for example Joel Clark Ackerman, Ruth Barrie, Nick Swardson, Marta Zolynska. Movie' genres are Comedy. The rating is 7 in This is really a good movie to watch. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 0 minutes. MongDu is interesting uploader, she is very lovely. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Crazy', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are users? ShinichiKuto is the best. I can't fight my iPhone screen. Share this movies torrent to support us . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

The most outrageous, uncensored comedy. The wildest live audiences. The biggest names in stand-up

Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? torrents

Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? full movie

Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted?2009 torrent

Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? torrent, Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? movie torrents, download Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? full movie, Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted?2009 torrents, download Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted?2009 torrents, watch Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? movie, Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? englishsub, free download Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? movie, movie Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted? torrent

Download   Nick Swardson: Seriously, Who Farted?(2009)DVDRip.AC3(ENG)-DROCKDVDRip5639697.86 MB

You may also like

Users reviews

Adam F (fr)

Original Cut with English Dub on Dvd, August 2, 2013). Unfortunately what could have been a great animated film is made just ok by the music, dialogue and sound effects but it's really a personal matter wether or not this will make the film enjoyable or not for you. So yes, "Little Nemo" is worth a watch despite the major flaws because the animation is so good. If you find the dialogue that bad, just put it on mute and play your favourite music while reading the subtitles, it might actually improve the film. For little children it will be particularly enjoyable because they won't be able to catch the flaws in the script, they'll just be impressed with what they see on the screen (that's not to say that children are stupid, it's just that they have less of an ear for dialogue than adults and are therefore less discriminating). For this English version though, it's still worth a watch, particularly if you're a fan of animation. Not having seen the film in its original language I can only assume that nearly all of the problems would be fixed by seeing this story with the original Japanese track (which isn't available on all of the film's releases on Dvd unfortunately). So here's what you've got ultimately: a movie that looks fantastic but has terrible sound. With a story that's not particularly complex, this flaw really cripples the film at times. It feels like the English version of the film was incredibly rushed and unfinished. The songs are not particularly well written or memorable either. Similar to the voice acting, the sound effects (particularly when there are large crowds) feel muted and underwhelming. You'll wish the story focussed more on her. Despite her limited screen time, her dialogue is sharp, funny and really builds up her character. The one character who shows the real potential the film could have had is Princess Camille. Looking at the film itself you're very impressed but then you're instantly let down the second the characters open their mouths to talk because most of the characters just aren't given any interesting dialogue. As for the Nightmare King, the voice he is given doesn't match the power of the visuals and just feels underwhelming. He talk in a high-pitched distorted voice that you can't understand except for here and there when you'll hear a word or two. Icarus is a flying squirrel so you don't really expect him to talk but he doesn't make animal noises either. Nemo's sidekick Icarus suffers similarly. You never really feel like you get to know him because despite being the main character he really doesn't have that much to say. For long stretches of the film Nemo's dialogue consists only of "Wowee!" "Woah!" "Oh No!" and "Woohoo!". It's not that the voice actors are particularly bad, but often they're just not given anything to do. What really hinders the movie is the vocals and the music. The animators really need to be praised for their work on the film. The film is also peppered with visual gags that really work (my personal favourite being the montage where Nemo is trained in the ways of being royalty, including fencing, dancing, horseback riding and reading all at once). The models for the main characters are consistently drawn and their movements fluid so the quality is great throughout. They range from Nemo, who is just a small child in his pajamas, to Professor Genius, an older gentleman that's tall and thin to Flip, who's short and stubby and looks like a cross between a hobo and a clown. Although this character is the one you'll likely remember best of all, all of the other characters are distinct from each other and well designed. When he is seen in his true form, he's just as imposing and does look like a genuinely frightening villain for our heroes. The scenes where he attacks Slumberland in this form as spectacular and the movie is worth seeing just for the wonderful effects used to create these images. At first, he creeps through the doorway between the worlds as a black mist with red and orange lights crackling through the curves, oozing around the floor. The crowning achievement in the creature design is the Nightmare King, who looks genuinely frightening and takes on a couple of forms that are a real sight to see. There's also a wide variety of different characters, with mostly humans populating Slumberland but a variety of animals in that realm too (ranging from dinosaurs to flying ostriches) and in Nightmare land, the frightening goblins that plague our heroes range from bat-winged creatures that resembles flying monkeys to aquatic fish monsters. There's a lot of imagination in the different setting of the film and a nice contrast between the real world (which is New york in 1905), Slumberland and Nightmare land, who all look unique and distinct. The visuals of the film are truly dazzling. Now Nemo, along with his new-found friends must save the kingdom. When Nemo is distracted from his royal duties by Flip, the most notorious and mischievous outlaw of Slumberland they accidentally unleash the Nightmare King. Thankfully, the only bridge between the two worlds is blocked off by a great door and Nemo is given the only key. Nemo's job as heir is to guard Slumberland against the Nightmare King, the terrifying demon-like ruler of Nightmare Land. It is populated by happy citizens and ruled by a benevolent king and his daughter, Princess Camille. Slumberland is the land of good dreams and a place where nearly anything can happen. The story follows Nemo, a young boy who is brought to slumberland to become the heir of King Morpheus. The visuals in "Little Nemo" are terrific but the english vocals, sound effects and music are awful

Aj V (ag)

So I think this movie was starting out good, but kinda got lost, so it's not the best. I understood the whole idea in this film about government not taking care of the people in our country, but after watching all these crazy antics Jimmy does in the movie it doesn't seem as important as him becoming a folk hero

Benjamin S (ag)

Its Blazing Saddles meets A tale of two cities and I dare say better than Monty Python why it didn't become a classic is beyond me. Gene Wilder and Donald Sutherland are hilarious together and the entire film is nonstop laughs from beginning to end. I'm surprised this film never made it big especially since it was released before all of Mel Brooks films. Most of you think you'd know after watching Monty Python but you have no idea how funny this movie is

Brandon W (it)

wish I could give it less than half a star. And I've never seen a more bland plot and acting. And it sounded like the same band throughout the whole movie. It was like they made the movie to try get a band noticed at times as there was music contantly playing in scenes where it was annoying. Hands down the worst movie I have seen in my life

Erika O (jp)

celente. . cine europeo. . . fresca,buena,graciosa y romantica. . . muy chula,buena,para nada cansona. . . una comedia italiana para nada cheesy que es romantica y con un tema muy discutido ,el amor :P desde diferentes fases y asi como e

Jeff H (us)

oh no. . . Jerry, Jerry

Jussi M (gb)

Tyylitelty vheleinen leffa

Lewis L (es)

Aside from ptsd, most of the other aspects of the movie are far from believable

Marlen C (br)

It had some funny moments, so that's why it's not a 1-star. Overall, I really didn't like this movie. And what was that scene with all the guys telling him it was ok if she promised to stop!!? Not realistic at all. No real drama once he found out she was cheating. He keeps having to forgive her and moving on. Tasha Smith's character was also too overdone! Sharon Leal and Tyler Perry's story was also bad. And I hated Janet Jackson's story line and the ending. This one lacked focus and seemed to drag on and on. I liked the first movie the best. This is an example of a sequel gone bad

Mr D (au)

You`d expect if a girl gets chased by an axe murderer she put some pants instead of just underpants with a puma motive. The soundtrack is a bit too 90s melodic punkrock, could have used any other kind of music. The story is a bit stereotypical "I told you not to go up to that mountain!" and victims that annoy in the first ten minutes. Could have used more gore and more nudity. Entertaining decent slasher