Niñas Mal

Niñas Mal

A rebellious teen butts heads with the teachers at an all-girl charm school in Mexico City.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:100 minutes
  • Release:2007
  • Language:Spanish
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:cruelty,   friend,   satire,  

A rebellious teen butts heads with the teachers at an all-girl charm school in Mexico City. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Niñas Mal torrent reviews

William C (de) wrote: Grade:Higher 5/10Johnny English Reborn is a comedy sequel that well, quite possiblybeats it's predecessor without actually being good. It has it's smalllaughs and smiles here and there, kids should love it but I couldn'thelp feel thinking all the way through "what was that all about". Now Ididn't think it was actually a Bad movie, not even poor, but veryclose, so beware, some will hate this movie quite a bit. I did feel itwas safely an average film, and here below is why I felt that about it.The story is actually a good one, of course the comedy never reallyworks with it but in any case, I actually enjoyed the back story forsome reason. The comedy isn't great mostly through the physical jokes,tired jokes that only 3 year olds like, don't get me wrong some arefunny and anyone can laugh, but a few...miss the mark. I enjoyed some ofthe action seen in the story, not too shabby stuff to say this isn't anaction specific film, and also the things like gadgets still providemore to the film amongst it's average humour.Rowan Atkinson's isn't too marvellous in this, there is no doubt he hasmade great comedy before but this, well I don't know about worst but hejust seems wasted and much more of him could have been showcased. Ireally like Johnny's fellow spy Dominic West who is actually reallygood in this, made me think maybe he should be in more serious filmsbut still contributes a lot of good acting to the movie. GillianAndersen didn't impress here, she is very stale, almost as if she wasthere for one day so why not, expected better from such an experiencedactor. Direction is a another thing that lets this down, I won't blameAtkinson mostly because Oliver Parker doesn't let him do enough andwhen the script does throw up a good opportunity, Parker ruins it, notawful but poor. The script is OK though, good dialogue and the spy talkis never silly or anything, comedy in it may not be A grade stuff butstill can provide laughter and bits are written in well here and thereto spread the funnier bits. Listen this isn't terrible at all, the laughs do get provided to us(usually via Atkinson) and the cast is not too shabby among all thestupidity going on here. When I rate a film average, I do like tobalance it out and I think this has been mostly negative so far so hereare some more positives. The setting is pretty nice and expands to manyplaces across the globe, the Hong Kong skyline provides one of the bestbackdrops. The fighting and shooting also provides thrills, even inthis, a comedy movie, quite good stuff.I would say that kids may like this more than the parents, some funstuff but very slapstick like and seen before. That said if you feelyou laugh at a lot of things then you may just like this, give it a goand you may absolutely love it. Fans of the first one also should likeit although English has a different feel around him where he almostseems more competent at his job and can actually do things right(thatisn't the case in the first one).Overall give this a higher 5/10, it is safely average and moving downwardsrather than upwards. Safely is the key word here, it isn't just aboutaverage though and escapes being poor and a negative mark. I am notsure if anymore of these films will ever be made but they are just goodfun, not to be enjoyed a lot really but nevertheless, I am 100% surepeople will like this, mostly from first hand experience of thosepeople.

Erin P (ag) wrote: This is an awesome movie and I love Amanda Bynes.

Sam K (jp) wrote: Best movie ever, a maser work in the terms of film fiction, These characters are a literal statement on local crime... Great movie Five shark fins up.. F u Rotten Tomatoes

Daryl T (au) wrote: Is there such a thing as no stars? Worse than the first with bad animation. Even Sheena Easton singing couldn't save it

Andrew W (gb) wrote: Could have been 10x better, but I still liked it, because I'm a worthless fanboy.

D M (de) wrote: Richard Pryor is a computer nerd who inspires the scheme in Office Space. Definitely more adult in message as Superman becomes one bad hombre. This film contained one of the first scenes which terrified me as a child (the end when the computer turned the bull-dyke into a cyborg). This sequel is actually a bit more high-concept than it is given credit as Superman faces himself in an all-out schizophrenic battle. I never think of this as a Richard Pryor film, per se, but this may one of his best. The funnest of the bunch.

Michael D (nl) wrote: different. sometimes outrageous. but wouldn't want to see it again...

Trent C (br) wrote: Even gratuitous amounts of sex and nudity can keep this interesting. It's shot well, but it's definitely not Pasolini's best.

Douglas C (kr) wrote: Chris Lee , Michael Ripper

John Y (kr) wrote: Sweet, sentimental movie. The sequel is better, but this one will definitely warm your heart.

Caitlin L (us) wrote: I didn't care for it. Slow moving. Was hoping for something more.

Jill R (kr) wrote: I'm not the biggest fan of megan fox i feel she has a very limited acting range but she did good here but amanda seyfried stole the show this was a mindless horror flick I didn't see the comedy I laughed twice but I'm not considering this a horror comedy this is a good mindless horror movie Grade B-

Brian P (ru) wrote: This is one of the movies you would throw in the time capsule to tell future generations what the 80's were like. This movie is sooo 80's: the bad music, the leg warmers, the hair,etc. Although I did like Jaime Lee Curtis in this movie (but I like Jaime Lee in everything). Travolta embarrasses himself, which he did a lot around this time in his career. Loved the mousse John.