The Nobel Medal of great Indian Poet Rabindra Nath Tagore was stolen in 2004 and it was never found. This film is a fictional account of what might have happened to the medal. A poor farmer... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
The Nobel Medal of great Indian Poet Rabindra Nath Tagore was stolen in 2004 and it was never found. This film is a fictional account of what might have happened to the medal. A poor farmer...
You may also like
Nobel Thief torrent reviews
Donald R (fr) wrote: Pretty dumb sequel. I am glad I didn't pay to watch it.
Sharon L (fr) wrote: Beautiful movie. I never knew about this lunch delivery service stuff. What an original concept and idea for a film. I found the ending very frustrating though. This is one where I would have like some resolution at the end. Blame Disney I guess! Loved it though.
Jason C (ca) wrote: A good first time effort, with excellent Cinematography from a friend, but ultimately a feature length Crimewatch with a poor pay off.
Bavner D (ru) wrote: Hanya berdurasi 92 menit, tetapi sungguh menyajikan tontonan komedi yang menarik. Walaupun cerita seakan mengalir dengan cepat, namun konflik yang disajikan cukup menghibur. Karakter Rowley yang menjadi unik akan dirinya sendiri mampu memberikan perhatian sendiri, dan terlihat perubahan ketika adanya konflik dalam persahabatan mereka.
Marco Z (ru) wrote: Great movie, with a desapointing end.
Philip D (gb) wrote: I like everyone in it but just horribly shot in my opinion. Very disappointed.
Sidney M (kr) wrote: Bonne petite comedie. En plus Aissa Maiga y fait une apparition (pendant 2 secondes!), ce qui ne gache rien :)
Max G (au) wrote: Live Free or Die Hard (Also known as Die Hard 4.0) is the WORST of the 5 films. An awful film with a boring story crapy action and mediocre acting.A disappointment.4.25/10 or 2 stars
Ryan S (it) wrote: Great film great kills
Ben L (br) wrote: Three bad actresses meet in Italy and set the women's rights movement back a century as they desperately search for a husband so that they can feel they have worth. Yes, I realize this film is a product of its time, and the 1950s wasn't the most progressive time in our history, but I was just stunned with how backwards the thinking was in this movie. Woman #1 has abandoned hopes of finding a husband in Italy, so she plans on moving back to the US to increase her odds of catching one. Woman #2 engages in an extremely elaborate string of lies and tricks in order to manipulate a man into marrying her. And finally, woman #3 convinces her boss (who is clearly gay) to propose to her even though he may die soon and he only proposes to keep her from leaving. So we start with weak characters doing stupid things for pathetic reasons. That would be bad enough but then there's the presentation. The director of this movie clearly had about as much interest in the story as I did, because Three Coins in the Fountain plays more like an elaborate video travelogue. There are literally 5-10 minute montages of images depicting the sites in Rome placed throughout the film. Every time someone steps outside they start up another slideshow of "Places to see in Rome." Hey, and as long as I'm complaining, I might as well mention that the title is even false because only 2 of the women actually drop a coin in the fountain. I swear the best part of this movie was just hearing Sinatra perform the theme song. This was nominated for Best Picture?? Ugh!
Armando P (de) wrote: 80 minutes of pure thriller.