On My Way
Deneuve plays sassy grandmother Cathy who takes to the road after being betrayed by her lover and learning her business is on the verge of bankruptcy on the same day. During a weeklong odyssey across France, she spends time with a grandson she hardly knows and reconnects with her past as former Miss Brittany through a reunion for former beauty queens.
- Stars:Catherine Deneuve, Nemo Schiffman, Gérard Garouste, Camille, Claude Gensac, Paul Hamy, Mylène Demongeot, Hafsia Herzi, Evelyne Leclercq, Valérie Lagrange, Valentin Guillaume, Pierre Toulgoat, Andréa Pocard, Marie Gombert, Davina Guillevic,
- Director:Emmanuelle Bercot,
- Writer:Emmanuelle Bercot (screenplay), Jérôme Tonnerre (screenplay)
Facing a failed relationship and a struggling restaurant, a woman hits the road for a trip with her grandson. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
On My Way torrent reviews
(de) wrote: One of the most depressing films I've ever seen portraying some of the most horrible I've ever seen. The life of the let's make believe crowd.Let's make believe sex has nothing to do with reproduction.Let's make believe we're decent people.Let's make believe we're not really killing a human fetus.Let's make believe we're not actually its parents and haven't really just treated it like the waste product of his orgasm.Let's make believe it's not the worst betrayal.Let's laugh and make jokes, watch Gone With the Wind and make believe it's all OK.Let's make believe that because I'm all cute and funny and goofy I must be a nice person.Let's make believe disposing of the imperfect and the inconvenient isn't fascist.I always had this image of women needing an abortion as being in need of help and sympathy not this couple of dicks. How and why do people watch this movie and see nice people? How?!
(jp) wrote: I really liked this movie but was somewhat disappointed in it, too.There are three major scenes depicting the famous marches on the Edmund Pettus Bridge and each of them is historically accurate, powerful in their depiction and highly moving.There are other scenes that are not nearly so accurate, powerful or moving.Contrary to popular opinion I was not transfixed by the performance of David Oyelowo as Rev. Martin Luther King. President Lyndon Johnson's portrayal as an antagonist to MLK, I believe, is over exaggerated. The J. Edger Hoover fixation on Dr. King is underplayed. And, much more doesn't work for me.Nonetheless, Selma, as a whole, is worthy of our attention, our discussion on its merits and flaws and our our respec
(it) wrote: Moving portrayal of the flawed relationship of a father and son through their life time together until the father's death, beautifully enacted by Jim Broadbent and Colin Firth with touching emotional restraint and honesty.
(kr) wrote: When I saw the premise for Crank and saw Jason Statham as the star I had some expectation that this would be a really fun movie. Well it's not all that really. Crank is about a guy who is injected with poison that slows him down and he has to keep his adrenaline going or else he will die. This had the potential to be a really good movie actually but this movie is far from really good. This movie starts off strong with a fun 35 minutes or so of him trying to figure out how to handle his condition and led to some good action scenes. The action scenes in general were a lot of fun actually, Statham was a pretty good hero in this movie (who caused all the action). The positives to this movie were the action scenes and Statham was pretty good but now to get on to my problems. To start, if this movie had more background in the beginning and got more character background this movie would be so much better. I couldn't feel for Chev as a character because I only knew he was a hit man and that's all the background really. Secondly some of the effects were pretty bad, the scene where the two fall out of a helicopter is ridiculously bad and not to mention impossible. Nobody bounces off of a car and then blinks through bloody eyes. There were also a ton of names to remember that got really confusing at times and some character names were only mentioned once and made it even worse. I know that this kind of movie is made for over the top action but some scenes like the falling scene were too bad to ignore. When he was falling from the helicopter and was able to call on his phone that was ridiculous. Maybe I'm giving this film too much hate but I was hoping this would be a better made movie with better backstory and maybe a bit longer. Crank had a lot of potential to be an awesome movie and it was fun at times but it just ended up being mediocre. C
(ag) wrote: I didn't really get sweeped in by this, but it is fun to hear the stories and see the "colors" of the NYC art scene during the late 90s.
(ru) wrote: Erm, a lot of sick, sick violence and gore. If you like 'em low budget, intelligent, slow and arty, but with squashed brains and such, watch this.
(ag) wrote: Waaaaay cheeeesy, and very uneven vampire flick that was completely entertaining.
(it) wrote: Dear Rotten Tomatoes,Please update the information you have regarding this exceptional, unique slasher film. Aristide Massaccesi (aka Joe D'Amato) had absolutely nothing to do with this picture. This is a rumor that has been floating around the internet for quite a long time now, based on the erroneous assumption that John Shadow is yet another in the long line of pseudonyms Massaccesi used during his long career. While I agree that the name seems almost too awesome to be true...it is. British filmmaker and rock musician John Shadow was once married to Swedish beauty queen Ewa Aulin and was indeed a real person. Pieces is one of his three known film credits, let's give credit only where it is due.Love,Brad
(ca) wrote: This movie is really pretty damn funny...Max while going to march in a parade in San Antonio...decides to re-take the Alamo to impress the love of his life in Mexico. Not wanting to create an international incident by removing them by force the US army has to figure out how to get them out...I really really liked this movie...you wont be sorry if you watch it...
(it) wrote: wow umn just seen this movie 4 the 1st time n think that this is a good movie 2 watch....its got a good cast of actors/actressess throughout this movie.....i think that jimmy mathers, jim stacy, hilda plowright, eddie hodges, harry holcombe, hayley mills, burl Ives, deborah walley, dorothy mcGuire play good roles/parts throughout this movie.......i think that the director of this classics/comedy/kids/family movie had done a great job of directing this movie because you never know what 2 expect throughout this movie.....i think that this is a really good family movie 2 watch its really enjoyable n its a good classics disney movie 2 watch
(br) wrote: Just another version / ripoff of "What's Your Number" lame.
(kr) wrote: poorly acted, horrible script. bad set design. Overall a horrible movie.
(fr) wrote: looks kinda intresting
(ca) wrote: In 1986, Ted Turner, the owner of the MGM film catalog, decided to take classic black and white movies and colorize them. The hue and cry from those passionate about film preservation caused the formation of the National Film Registry in the Library of Congress. Starting in 1989, the Registry began selecting 25 celluloid marvels to save and preserve each year. At 525 films and growing, filmmakers Paul Mariano and Kurt Norton tell us the story of "These Amazing Shadows."The board was established by Congress in the late 1980s, and since 1989 has chosen 25 movies per year for inclusion in the Library of Congress's National Film Registry. The films must be "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant,'' which leaves a lot of room to move beyond the "greatest hits'' mentality of the American Film Institute and other cultural list-makers.And in fact the most engrossing moments in "These Amazing Shadows'' focus not on "Citizen Kane'' and "The Godfather'' (or "Alien'' and "Back to the Future'') but more offbeat choices that say as much, if not more, about the movies' central place in documenting American culture for better and worse. The World War II-era "Topaz'' is actually one man's home movies of the US internment of Japanese citizens. A public-service documentary like "Duck and Cover'' portrays 1950s nuclear fears with now-campy naivete. No one needs to be told what the Zapruder film means to the national psyche.In addition to scenes from 160 of the 550 films in the registry, "These Amazing Shadows'' rounds up an illustrious roster of talking heads: directors like Christopher Nolan, John Waters, Barbara Kopple, and Wayne Wang; film critics Mick LaSalle and Jay Carr; actors Debbie Reynolds and Tim Roth; producers (Gale Anne Hurd), cinematographers (Caleb Deschanel). An unexpectedly poignant moment comes when Gregory Peck's son, Stephen, a Vietnam veteran, espouses the horrors of war, and how films such as The Deer Hunter, The Best Years of Our Lives, etc. have captured the plight of veterans -- and the absolute necessity to preserve these messages for future generations.The people you keep coming back to, though, are the preservationists themselves, dedicated young artisans with offbeat senses of humor and the passion to spend weeks at a time rebuilding a lost film frame by frame. George Willeman is exactly the sort of character you'd expect the Library of Congress's Nitrate Film Vault Manager to be, and he's great company as he describes the joy of discovering a pre-censorship print of the acrid 1933 Barbara Stanwyck classic Baby Face and getting it out to the world.The importance of recovering uncensored originals and plugging the holes in America's consciousness is only one of the messages here. The documentary surveys the genres covered by the registry, praises efforts to bring attention to women and minority filmmakers, considers the movies as social glue and cultural memory, and makes an implicit plea for continued congressional funding in these draconian times.Yet the mission of this film, the board, and the registry is summed up most simply in an offhand comment by board member and film scholar Robert Rosen: "Why would you want to save movies? I would ask, Why do we save family pictures?'' They're cultural artifacts, timestamps of bygone eras, and they transform us in a way no other medium can.
(fr) wrote: Starts as a regular cheesy horror story but the end turns into this beautiful heartwarming twist that changes the whole perspective of the movie, twist that shows the differences between the way kids and adults perceive the world's reality.