On The Buses

On The Buses

Stan gets a little annoyed when his Mum and Sister keep buying expensive items on hire purchase, but the money he earns for overtime working as a bus driver means that he can afford it... just! His job is secure, as bus drivers are hard to come by, and his overtime prospects are good, until the bus company decide to revoke a long standing rule and employ women bus drivers. Aghast at the thought of

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:88 minutes
  • Release:1971
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:sequel,   sidekick,   bus,  

To keep his spendthrift mum and sister happy, bus driver Stan brings in big cash by working overtime. But things get harder for him when his bus company decide to revoke a long standing rule and employ women bus drivers. Worried at the thought of less wages, he teams with his longtime colleague Jack to sabotage the new female employees. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

On The Buses torrent reviews

Heather M (us) wrote: Conrad Valmont is a giant man child and I see no reason to have him as the central character in this story when there were so many other better options.

Haydn W (fr) wrote: Well, directed and acted but comes across as the version of FUNNY GAMES Haneke was taking the mickey out of.

Pamela W (kr) wrote: I actually enjoyed the relationships and portrayal of characters by actors. Interesting expose of a rich dying matriarch and her dysfunctional relationship with her adult (?) children. Well directed and a great screenplay.

James C (gb) wrote: The plot, the characters and the feels? Miserable and frustrating.

Darren D (jp) wrote: Low budget and poorly acted horror movie. One of the lead actors looked like he wanted to be 'Fonzie' from Happy Days which was amusing. Other then that, nothing to recommend here.

Hasan Q (mx) wrote: Civic duty shows that kind of american ppl who have nothin 2 do but blamin Islam on everything. They should c the crimes their army r spreading all over the world who simply can explode a peacefull wife into peices same as what happened to khalid's in the film. Actually it should be us Muslims who got suspecious of every single american..

savannah x (gb) wrote: i only liked the intro and outro, the rest was boring and dumb lol

Begum E (us) wrote: it is siply impossible to express how beatiful and intriguding this movie is, almost like magic...

Bob W (ru) wrote: Basically, this is "Another Charade" with the same Hitchcock-esque romance, humor, playful suspense, etc. Except in place of Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn, it's Peck and Loren. The plot is kind of 60's mod silly, bordering on camp at times, but mildly entertaining, especially if you are a fan of the actors.

Gabriella T (au) wrote: My favorite one out of the three!! It really brings Mad Max to a whole new level!

Caesar M (br) wrote: Now you're probably asking why in the world would I review Hercules in New York. Well my friend made a bet with me that I couldn't sit through the whole movie, I did, and I should have left sooner. Hercules (Schwarzenegger) is sent to Earth where he finds true love and starts a promising career in the bodybuilder business. Now to be truthful, the main selling point of this DVD is Arnold voice, it's says "Featuring Arnold real voice for the first time" on the DVD. So getting that out of the way, he's speak terrible English in his first role. Oh yeah the plot, well, it doesn't have one. Well it does, but it's so poorly written and over the top you'll be scratching your head on what in the world you're watching. So in order to get through this movie, me and my friend, Alex, decided to play a drinking game, we would take a shot of beer for every word Arnold said incorrectly, we almost got drunk in three minutes. If we played five minute longer, we would have our stomach pump, that's how bad Arnold English is. This movie is ridiculous on so many level. Like how Arnold fights a Bear, fight sailors who rescued him with some laughably bad music, and something about the Mafia being involve it's just nonsense. This movie is literally stupid, just read the title, Hercules in New York. If Tarzan adventure in New York wasn't interesting, what made these people think it would work with Hercules. So Hercules in New York is a bad movie with allot of filler and useless characters that make you wonder how Arnold acting career ever took off. Now this is better than some of the movie I usually pick up, it's no Vampiro, it's no Gingerdead Man, it's no Ninja Squad, and that's why it gets a 10% from me. So what did I win from the bet your probably wondering, a free copy of Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol, which is why it also gets a 10%.

Benjamin S (us) wrote: An interesting piece. Will have my full review shortly.

Herbert R (ag) wrote: Well deserved Oscar for Cagney!!! Great film!!!

Barry P (jp) wrote: Al Pacino and Plummer are very solid, and so is Cannavale in a way. The Lennon soundtrack is worth the price of admission on it's own.

Barb T (us) wrote: Beautiful film that resembles the paintings of Vermeer in the colors and lighting. Vermeer becomes obsessed, in a way, with Griet and must paint her. However, it is only the painting that consumes him, and there is really no connection to the human he paints. Very quiet film. As it is about an artist, it is not surprising that the dialogue is sparse. The film is about seeing and feeling without knowing for certain.

Kimberly K (ag) wrote: I found this to be rather funny.