Paano kita iibigin

Paano kita iibigin

Fired from her job and evicted from her apartment, Martee (Regine Velasquez) brings herself and her asthmatic son to Zambales for a vacation. In a dilapidated resort, owned by Lance (Piolo Pascual), Martee finds work as a manager whose duties entails plans on how to increase the resort’s clientele. At first, Martee finds difficulty adjusting to the slower provincial lifestyle, but eventually she finds the laid-back pace more favorable.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:114 minutes
  • Release:2007
  • Language:Filipino,Tagalog,English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:beach,   dog,   elopement,  

Fired from her job and evicted from her apartment, Martee (Regine Velasquez) brings herself and her asthmatic son to Zambales for a vacation. In a dilapidated resort, owned by Lance (Piolo Pascual), Martee finds work as a manager whose duties entails plans on how to increase the resort’s clientele. At first, Martee finds difficulty adjusting to the slower provincial lifestyle, but eventually she finds the laid-back pace more favorable. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Paano kita iibigin torrent reviews

Jeff B (de) wrote: OK, first of all it's Terry Gilliam: Brazil, Not the Messiah, The Crimson Permanent Assurance, 12 Monkey's, The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, etc. So that alone was good enough for me as an in. Right off the bat, the visual aesthetic should be familiar. Gilliam's writing, directing, art work precedes him. But unfortunately the film does not stand on its own merits. Initially it is intriguing but the pay-off is weak. It's Douglas Adam's question about what is the meaning of life and everything? That's a long row to hoe, and it appears that such an absurd, unanswerable question needs to be handled with some humour (the answer being, of course, 42) or else the pay-off is weak. The question lingers as the overarching theme of the movie, but it is really the relationship between Qohen and Bainsley that is the most revealing. Both are dysfunctional and at a loss for happiness, but it is only in this coming together of losses, if you will, where mutual meaning is found. Kind of matter / anti-matter joining to create a coherent whole. But while this relationship is afoot, as Qohen looks for meaning in trying to discover the zero theorem, or so he supposes, his faith lies in a call that he feels will inform him of his purpose or meaning of life, at least for him. Interesting that it is Bainsley who will give him the greatest resolution and calm, as he attempts to avoid her at all cost. Eventually he meets Management (Matt Damon); Qohen discovers that the theorem he is attempting to solve has nothing to do with discovering a purposeful meaning of life but rather quite the opposite. Management is actually trying to prove that there is no meaning to life and uses Qohen (the antithesis) and his unrelenting need to find meaning against him. When Qohen discovers this, he becomes so upset he smashes the Neural Net which collapses, revealing a black hole inside; the same black hole Qohen often dreamed about. It is in this ending, the collapse of the universe, the end of all meaning, where Qohen finds meaning, for as the credits role he hears the voice of Bainsley, his love, or that which brings meaning to his life. While all this great seeking and questioning is going on to find meaning or to reveal meaninglessness, it is in the simple and slight where greatest meaning is found: a connection between two small, simple sentient beings. A good film with an interesting twist, but the question is just how many would find any great meaning in viewing the film. An ironic question indeed.

Justin B (au) wrote: More like a send up to the works of Troma rather than drive-in B-movies. As an anthology film, the quality is inconsistent and It occasionally misses the mark (the second story is horrendously misguided) but overall it's a very funny and very gooey compilation of bad taste.

Peter C (nl) wrote: Would have done better on Lifetime.

Cyndi C (it) wrote: Wow....this was a really fascinating movie. He came up through the ranks with Rove. Great insight into the backroom workings of elections, as well as a a good illustration of how the Republicans gained and kept power. If you like politics see it!

Nene J (ru) wrote: Not worth the effort to watch it.

Sean G (mx) wrote: I know I shouldn't like this movie (predictable plot, formulaic) but it was so stupidly funny, I had to love it.

Michael A (ca) wrote: cute movie...really really bad acting.

John T (fr) wrote: I liked this one. It's all about how beauty is only skin deep... or something like that... I was too busy looking at the beauty to pay attention...

kevin B (jp) wrote: Luv this weird movie

lynn j (kr) wrote: i don't really like chinese movies. they speak too fast, so i can't understand them even if i am chinese

Nancy The Shieldmaiden (br) wrote: One of the better redetions of an Agatha Cristie story. And of course, it features a top notch cast.

Matt L (fr) wrote: Not a great movie, but honestly I laughed my ass off.