You may also like
Paltoquet torrent reviews
Kenneth S (de) wrote: It was slow, but it was beautiful and had a nice story in it. I really enjoyed watching it on Netflix! Good acting too!
Tejpal S (ru) wrote: I like this movie because on theater I watched it it is cool movie that's why I rate it five stars
Jasrick J (au) wrote: Horrible, pathetic garbage film that leaves you with a headache. AVOID!!! Luckily i watched it for free.
Victoria W (mx) wrote: it was a pretty good movie.
Duncan P (it) wrote: Admittedly, I'm a bit of a sucker for these kinds of psychological sci-fi/mystery films so maybe I'm a bit biased, but I quite enjoyed it. A bit derivative of other sci-fi films, perhaps, being a little bit Sphere, a little bit Alien, and a mish-mash of other things, but still, the whole ends up being more than the sum of parts. It's also maybe a bit obtuse for its own good sometimes, thanks to the postmodern narrative elements, so I suspect it would probably work best on subsequent viewings.So, overall, I'll recommend it to the other sci-fi geeks out there, provided you don't particularly mind having to chew on your popcorn a bit more than usual.
Sunshine s (ru) wrote: In 1994, in her high-school prom, Freya McAllister (Navi Rawat) starts to hear voices in her head, is declared schizophrenic and sent to a mental institution. She is treated by Dr. Michael Welles (Peter Horton), who is sponsored by the National Secur...
Alex r (it) wrote: Sequel to the very funny comedy, Analyze This is an awful failure in terms of delivering more laughs that the first one did so well. This film has a very poor script, and story that doesn't do anything to make you laugh. The first film had plenty of laughs to keep you entertained, but this one relies on the same old, same old to deliver its humor. The result is a misfire that is pointless and is a waste of time to watch. The film's plot lacks any originality and though it has a good cast, the film can't be saved and it becomes one of the worst comedic sequels that I've seen. This film simply wasn't funny and it missed the mark on so many occasions. Also, this sequel proves that some comedies don't need sequels, and they're better as a standalone film. Only one sequel comes to mind when I think of something worse, and that's The Hangover Part 2. Analyze That is not worth your time, if you love the first film, skip this film, it's bad. The problem with this film is that I found it similar in part to the first film, and it doesn't do anything original with its plot. This is a poorly constructed film, one that doesn't payoff and is almost free. Not even a great cast like this could save this tiresome, awful film. Harold Ramis has directed some fine comedies in the past, but with Analyze That, he makes one of his worst directorial outings. The first film was so great, funny, witty and original. This sequel is just uninspired trash that doesn't work and it misses the mark on so many occasions. Not worth your time.
Valria V (us) wrote: I found a movie a little confusing, kind of depends on the point of view. But the dramas are part of insecure people and cserto so ignorant.
john e (ag) wrote: they could not get any better for family time
Mike C (de) wrote: Unintentionally funny a lot but the hour or so of it I saw wasn't terrible lol
sarah w (us) wrote: This is a good film with the right mixture of comedy and action. Ok the story line is not really up to much but the fight scenes were really good. It makes a change for America to get a Martial Arts film right but they managed it with this. I thought it was funnier than Rush Hour (this was made first).
Michael R (kr) wrote: It couldn't be more boring. One and a half hours of watching little kids on a sugar rush waiting to get into Disneyland. As soon as they started to discuss anything interesting about physics they faded away. I've seen more informative 20 minute you tube vids. To summarize it in one word: BORING