Popular radio show host Dave Garver (Clint Eastwood) becomes restless in his relationship with his girlfriend (Donna Mills). But his brief fling with an obsessed female fan takes a frightening, and perhaps even deadly turn when his girlfriend enters the picture. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Play Misty For Me
A brief fling between a male disc jockey and an obsessed female fan takes a frightening, and perhaps even deadly turn when another woman enters the picture.
You may also like
Play Misty For Me torrent reviews
Rudy F (de) wrote: Save your sanity and skip this.
JFloyd3 W (jp) wrote: Again, let's hope it makes sense to Godard...unless his sense of the world is how ultimately senseless it is...with Socialism as an ideal as Communism has proven it cannot truly happen...
WS W (it) wrote: Finally came a decent film role for Vincent Perez again. The film, however, is not so good (even though there was the-always-stable Jeremie Renier as Perez's sidekick). Quite interesting setting in premise but once again the very unique Frenchie way of narrative (that is, slow, flat & plain, with a bit dragging here & there, alienating) just couldn't keep it up.
Kami B (gb) wrote: Didn't live up to the first and the change of character didn't go unnoticed. Meh- good family movie nonetheless.
Luke A (kr) wrote: It's funny as well as serious... Every characters fits perfectly and seldom are there moments where you think about something else going on in your life. Engaging, enchanting and entertaining, 2 Days in Paris checks off the 3 E's of a good romantic comedy.
Marilena G (us) wrote: Nope, this is not worth it. 1 hour and 54 minutes of old-school party fun. But it's not fun to watch, or inspiring, or interesting, or the least bit touching.
Private U (mx) wrote: A mediocre and poorly-made documentary about Arnie's campaign for govenor of California. There isn't anything terribly revealing here that hasn't already been reported in the news or television.
D M (it) wrote: A young journalist takes her first assignment to investigate the disappearance of a film crew who went looking for a monster in Iceland. She discovers the monster who killed and dismembered the crew along with many other people. He is ancient and immortal, but very distraught. She comforts him and they decide to return to civilization to locate a scientist who claims he has a way of completely destroying matter. Too much fluff and no real character development. More focus should have been put on the two main characters, but it seemed to have been filled with things that didnt move the plot along, only made it feature length.
Laura G (fr) wrote: all the leaves are brown and the sky is gray...(TM)(TM) :PThis movie is just what the title suggests...facts of life, as quirky as they may be. :)
Anne S (nl) wrote: I really love this movie.. It's been a few years since I watched it last.. so I decided that I would put it on.. I fell in love with it all over again..
Lisa I (de) wrote: Decent. The original I found funnier though.
Shawn S (it) wrote: So-so, paid $4 for it so I didn't expect much. Was okay, interesting plot. Seemed like a ... made for tv flik, kinda that poorer quality to the film. Real life problems, real life decisions.
Craig R (fr) wrote: A very cool slasher/revenge film similar to Halloween, but with a cop. This movie is pretty good in all aspects and really keeps the watchers attention. Somtetimes seeming a little predictable, yet never what you fully expect, creating a little bit of suspense. Everything comes together nicely in the end with most questions answered and a final scene leaving you ready for more.
Kevin M (kr) wrote: I'm retroactively rating films I was made to watch as a child. This movie sucks.
Rachel M (kr) wrote: I've watched this movie multiple times. It's one my families favourites. It has a wonderful cast, Lee Marvin is funny, witty and completely charming as the grizzled mountain man/miner. Clint Eastwood is riveting as both a quiet mannered farmer who transforms into a gold mining gambler. The singing is just part of the plot, it rolls along in the movie, avoiding a lot of the cheesier cliched type musicals. There are so many wonderful lines in this movie, it is a timeless classic that celebrates the gold mining era in California, the good and the bad.I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys westerns, classic movies and comedy.
Caleb S (ag) wrote: I guess it was mostly made to triger a return of audiences to the movies, what with tv looking like a credible threat at the time...but hollywood's still here, and this movie's rather fun to watch.
Tim M (ca) wrote: Gun Crazy: Requiem for a Bodyguard is the fourth installment in the series. While better than the third, it leaves much to be desired. There are only two significant gun sequences. Thankfully, they both feature multiple shooters and automatics. The ending is pretty decent, but hardly qualifies the title (maybe it's gun crazy by Japanese standards) Made in 2004, it's like it ignored the Gun Fu genre.
John W (es) wrote: Some of the boxing scenes are still incredible by today's standards.
Hayley K (it) wrote: Campy but entertaining.
Indu R (gb) wrote: I thought this movie was going to be good, but I was wrong. There was not much of a plot and there were too many holes. The acting was not that good. There was some action though.