Officer Joe Vickers would probably make a good policeman if it weren't for his two nasty habits. Firstly, he is a devoted satanist; secondly - he likes to kill people. When he meets a group of teenagers spending their vacation in a wood hut, he decides to investigate...
A group of hunters enters a ghost town in Central Asia with a mission to kill packs of abandoned, and now wild cannibal dogs. But tables turn and there seems to be no way for the hunters to survive the horrific battle. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Psy torrent reviews
(au) wrote: Jag gillar dokumentrer.
(br) wrote: No um filme fcil....mas para quem se aventurar, vale a muito a pena. Fica meio chato de to confuso no meio, mas depois engrena...se tiver noo de fsica e coisas cientificas melhora ainda mais!
(de) wrote: I liked it. It was interesting.
(us) wrote: This would be a mostly unmemorable frat house comedy if not for the amazing soundtrack that ties it all together. Still, it's a good, easy watch and actually a pretty accurate and authentic feeling representation of Southern California mid to late 90's University life.
(nl) wrote: Staring madhuri dixit and salman khan
(ca) wrote: its very romantic mov!!!!!!!!!!!
(jp) wrote: A long quiet film, mostly dull but with some certain powerful scenes. Was lauded at the time because critics were aghast at the end of 1970s angst cinema and the rise of the glossy, artificial styles of the 1980s. Can't blame them even if I love both styles.
(ca) wrote: A good guy flick with the great Clint Eastwood and Some rising star named Jeff bridges is it this movie !
(ag) wrote: Papillon give me the toughness of living.2nd, BS, 2015/11/1
(es) wrote: Not one of the early Bond's best, but the underwater scenes are fantastic for the time and Connery always shows up with his best.
(de) wrote: Other than the Wayne performance I thought this was pretty lame. The story was predictable and the action basic. At the time of its release the subject matter was still fresh and relevant but now you have to try a bit harder to impress.
(ca) wrote: a sequel 3 yrs in the making does not disappoint maybe 'cos everybody from first pic are back-even Spencer Tracy
(es) wrote: Just what you would expect from a film based on a story from Cosmo. (They had stories in Cosmo back then? Are you sure this wasn't based on a quiz from Cosmo? "His secretary is a.) super hot; b.) cute; c.) plain; or d.) hideously ugly") Not a total waste of time because of the stars, but not one you'll want to watch over and over.
(au) wrote: I own this on DVD and Blu-Ray
(es) wrote: Grotesque and confusing, but leaves a lasting impression and commentary that is still relevant today.