Purana Mandir

Purana Mandir

Suman lives a wealthy lifestyle along with her widower dad, Thakur Ranvir Singh, and an unmarried aunt, Damyanti, in a palatial house in Bombay. They are direct descendants of Raja Hariman Singh of Bijapur. When Ranvir finds out that Suman is in love with a middle-classed male, Sanjay, he expresses displeasure and forbids her to ever see him again. When she persists, he tells her that there is a curse on the entire family - a curse that was inflicted 200 years ago by a blood-thirsty, flesh-eating demon named Samri.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:0 minutes
  • Release:1984
  • Language:Hindi
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:revenge,   will,   love,  

After a rich young girl has suddenly known about a demon and it's terrible curse brought by her family for generations, she decides to go to her paternal village with her lover and his friend to find out the truth. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Purana Mandir torrent reviews

Sam R (ru) wrote: This movie makes me admire Buck Brannaman not as a horse trainer, but as a person. Although I do admire the way he handles horses, I can't truly appreciate what he does with the animals due to my lack of knowledge on horses as much as I can appreciate him as a person. Buck believes that a person can be judged on how they handle act around horses, an interesting statement in itself, but definitely a topic that would make one want to see this movie. With that being said, I would for sure recommend this movie to anyone who wants to be inspired.

E L (gb) wrote: Contains some of the more spectacular and exciting fight choreography I've yet seen in recent years. The CG is a little overbearing but bearable. Entertaining ride.

Moses O (it) wrote: Cruel, sadistic and without hope...but purposely so. Edison Chen and Sam Lee throw themselves into their roles begging the audience to see them not as HK teeny boppers, but as living, breathing character actors. It works for the most part (except for the faltering last act), but some time should have been spent asking the same question you will have when the credits roll. What was the point?

Nicolas M (us) wrote: Un m (C)lange de film fantastique et de film de gangster certainement original pour l' (C)poque.La r (C)alisation est toutefois assez poussive avec des retour au r (C)cit aussi intempestifs qu'inutiles.Il y a toutefois des s (C)quence fort int (C)ressantes.

Hannibal O (us) wrote: Less a movie, more a academic presentation. The evidence presented is exhaustive and well organized. True, it is a bunch of talking heads, news clips, and documents and its all stuff you've probably heard before (if you follow the news), but its a nice re-cap of the past 5 years. I mainly enjoyed it because it interviews ex-insiders who not only know their stuff, but some were even pro-war and its interesting to hear why they changed their views.

Anastasia (kr) wrote: Needed little more (13, 14)

jonathan v (ru) wrote: Great movie and still holds up!

Anders K (au) wrote: Starter nogenlunde, og ender som et klasseeksempel p italiensk trash. Bestemt underholdende

Andr D (mx) wrote: Carl Weathers deja los guantes de Apollo Creed y se convierte en un rudo polica ochentoso, en una cinta hiper-violenta, llena de clichs, superficial al mximo y con las bellas Vanity y Sharon Stone como adorno. Solo en los 80.

Carlos G (fr) wrote: Si, es Hammet.Y Rafelson (aunque hace tanto que no le veo que no se con que comparar, ya). Uno esperaria mas, entonces. Si no fuera por todas las actuaciones (brillantes, incluso Mila), el guion flaco y rellenado a los apurones dara un poco de pena.

Shane D (kr) wrote: So good. So bad. So good.

Claude L (nl) wrote: Just saw this movie in 2016. Delightful! How you get a spy movie, adventure, movie, and comedy to work is pretty good. A lot of fun!

Jessica H (ru) wrote: Nicolas Cage could have played crazy better, but Paul Walker looks the Part. Too bad there is to much of him in every part he's played. It makes it difficult to see him as the character and not just the Actor playing the guy pretending to be a different guy. If this does not bother you, you may be able to enjoy this movie.

Timmer M (it) wrote: Lololol. What a terrible movie. At the beginning it had potential but that all went down hill. 1) No one is that mean, teens are cruel but not to the extent of what is portrayed in the movie no reasonable person is going to start hitting his friend because he attended youth group, there are plenty of religious jocks out there, look at Tim Tebow. 2) The stereotypes suck. Jake Taylor is a perfect white, blond hair, blue eyed basketball player and his girlfriend is also blonde. It is just awful. 3) there are no house parties like the ones in the movie, if there is they usually involve meth. Lastly, it was disappointing because it was trying to say people that are religious do good because of god, not because it is the right thing to do.