Quest for Dragons

Quest for Dragons

Dragon images and stories abound in ancient literature, archeology, mythology, and science. From as far back as 4000BC Sumeria to today, dragons have pervaded human cultures worldwide. But are they real?

Dragon images and stories abound in ancient literature, archeology, mythology, and science. From as far back as 4000BC Sumeria to today, dragons have pervaded human cultures worldwide. But are they real? . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Quest for Dragons torrent reviews

Andrew B (mx) wrote: I've read all the reviews from this "website" based on multiple movie titles and I have finally succumb to which no "critic" has any perspective on reality. This was in a very intellectual movie and yet inspiring and uninspiring roles castes because people don't see the belief in this movie. Movies are just movies, but you slap on a "Based on true events" to this movie and I guarenterr its over a 70% margin on rotten tomatoes. An entirely under rated movie. My attck here isn't based on the movie yet based on critics who think they know what a film ventures into. Credit is not given where credit is deserved. And this shall stand with me, that I will never trust this sites ratings again after very numerous and previous dispositions to their standings.

Rory Fyfe S (fr) wrote: I loved this movie,. Beautiful women, great acting, A story with something to say.

Lucky R (kr) wrote: Love or hate it... for the master of all SW universe...

Michael M (jp) wrote: Self-indulgent garbage. The filmmaker lies to make the material more sensational, making the whole thing questionable. Poorly narrated, poorly made, full of lies and western misunderstandings. Complete shit.

Alison R (au) wrote: Such a beautiful movie. If you're a fan of Townes Van Zandt or just interested in watching a documentary on one of the most underrated singer-songwriters of all time, watch this movie.

Private U (us) wrote: if you don't want to see anything repulsive, don't see this film. i don't want to see it again either, thanks. having said that i also say that it does have some perverse charm. unforgettable, lol.

Katie L (au) wrote: Even though I had the ending figured out within the first 5 minutes, I still enjoyed this movie.

Grant H (us) wrote: 70's slasher film that meets minimal expectations.

James H (ag) wrote: THIS TV MADE MOVIE LOOKS AND FEELS JUST LIKE THAT. THE ACTING AND DIRECTION IS BELOW AVERAGE. OVERLY SENTIMENTAL. THIS MOVIE IS MOSTLY SIGNIFICANT TODAY AS A GLIMPSE OF JOHN TRAVOLTA BEFORE HIS BIG SCREEN DEBUT.

Private U (ag) wrote: It's awesomely cheesy (the special effects, the dialogue, the villainous politician), but it's surprisingly effective at some points. I liked the scene where the woman is used as a medium for the aliens to declare their intentions, and the ending is suitably creepy while still being silly-looking.

Najd G (es) wrote: I wasn't blown away, though good use of Harold Ramis.

Josien B (it) wrote: This movie destroys everything that happened in the first movie. Even though this one is more accurate to the true story than the first, it's the worst sequel I've ever watched

Ollie L (kr) wrote: Went to cinema and it was all that was on. It was so bad that Half the people watching in the audience had killed themselves 20 minutes in. It was extremely boring so we tried to sneak into 22 jump street half way through. So all in all it was the best film I have ever seen. I would recommend you watch this film repeatedly because it is fantastic. ( especially the bit where it finished).Legit .

Ariel D (de) wrote: I haven't read the book, so I do not know how the base material is but the movie was very disjointed. The thought process of Mariah's search for his brother was completely unclear... Basically, as soon as he arrives on the island, in my opinion, the movie completely falls apart as a story. The costumes were fun though.