Ragalaipuram (2013) torrents full movies

Ragalaipuram is a new movie of Mano. This movie was introduced in 2013. We can counted many actors in this movie torrents, such as Dulquer Salmaan, Nazriya Nazim, Nivin Pauly, Fahadh Faasil, Kalpana, Nithya Menon, M.S. Bhaskar, Delhi Ganesh, Karunas, Ken Karunas, Kottaikumar, Manobala, Mayilsamy, Uma Pathmanabhan, Pawan, Bharath Reddy, Angana Roy, Kovai Sarala, Shakeela, Singampuli, Sanjana Singh. Movie' genres are Drama. The rating is 4.1 in www.imdb.com. This is really a good movie to watch. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 0 minutes. Chich1Phat is good uploader, he is very lovely. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Crazy', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are customers? Maria Ozawa is the best. I can't leave my laptop screen. Enjoy this movies torrent and share to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Ragalaipuram torrents

Ragalaipuram full movie

Ragalaipuram2013 torrent

Ragalaipuram torrent, Ragalaipuram movie torrents, download Ragalaipuram full movie, Ragalaipuram2013 torrents, download Ragalaipuram2013 torrents, watch Ragalaipuram movie, Ragalaipuram englishsub, free download Ragalaipuram movie, movie Ragalaipuram torrent

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Ragalaipuram (2013) - 1CD - DvDSCR - Tamil Movie - DownloadScreener5136697.35 MB
Download   Ragalapuram (2013) Tamil Untouched Suara - DVD 5 - UyirvaniOther49404 GB
Download   Ragalapuram (2013) Tamil Suara - DVDRip - Xvid - UyirvaniDVDRip3325692.59 MB
Download   Ragalapuram (2013) Tamil Suara - DVDRip - x264 - UyirvaniDVDRip4532401.88 MB

You may also like


Users reviews


Anthony F (jp)

ol. lol Everything about the movie was great: the acting, the plot, the music; fine, I've seen this one too many times and I'm on the verge of throwing my TV out when I see it premiere on TBS for the billionth time, but if I took this movie in small doses, I'd be sane. What started the sappy-sports-made-by-Disney film genre


Cline H (nl)

J'ai trouv que c'tait beaucoup de bruit, de glauque, pour une histoire qui n'tait pas trs raffine, complexe. Mais je n'ai pas aim plus que a. compltement djant


Dimitri S (ru)

The best movie from David Carson. For me it's the second best movie with Wesley Snipes. Great story. Great action. A love this movie. It's a really good action movie


Eliabeth w (mx)

loved it great movie


Forrist B (de)

Only good part of this film is Carrie Fisher with a shotgun!


Jesse O (kr)

I'd certainly recommend this if you haven't yet seen it. Like I said, that doesn't mean it's perfect, but it's got a timeless quality about it. Or if you watch it 1000 years from now. It's not perfect, but it's one of those movies that will, most likely, keep being good no matter how many times you watch it. 5 stars instead of 3. The casting is great, though the characterization of Tia left a lot to be desired in some parts, and the film is lighthearted and funny enough for me to give this 3. It's a lot of fun to watch. But I digress, I really liked this movie. You, sir or madam, are the real MVP. A tip of the hat to who ever convinced the MPAA to give this a PG rating with those two jokes in. The pussy joke is more memorable though, but they do mention putting loads in, so there you go. There was another instance of this, with the washing machine scene where Marcie, Buck's family's neighbor) comes in and thinks Buck is talking dirty to a woman as they're having sex. The fact that they got a subtle PUSSY joke (that only the adults and some teens) would get past the MPAA was pretty great. Your movie might not even have any cursing or any other "questionable" material by the MPAA, but they'll give you a PG-13 for a fart and an R-rating for one instance of someone using the word fuck. Nowadays you get an instant PG-13 rating if you look at someone with intent to kill. By this time, PG-13 had already been put into place, so it's not like there wasn't a rating for them to go with. Don't get me wrong, it was a pretty fucking great joke in how clever it was, but I'm surprised that they got this through in a PG movie. I was certainly surprised by this joke. and then it cuts away as we hear a cat yowling outside the house. . . The scene ends with Buck saying Felix is what we called your. There's some a very sexually suggestive scene here with Buck and Chanice (his girlfriend) discussing Buck's nicknames for several of Chanice's private parts. It sounds silly writing it out, but it is a funny scene. I thought it was a funny movie, the most memorable scene being between Macaulay Culkin asking a lot of consecutive questions and Buck just answering them in quick succession. Again, this is something you've seen before and will see again, but I didn't mind it because this movie was quite good. It's done so Uncle Buck's kindness and wise words can turn Tia into a loving daughter once again. But, you know the reason the character is like that. And I don't mean that in the 'this is fake and I'm suspending my disbelief' kind of way, I mean in the 'I just wish she would go away' kind of way. This is a John Hughes comedy, so I can't fault him for being one-dimensional about his characters, but Tia is really kind of a detestable character that you legitimately don't like. She's just a dick because she is. I get it, teens are dicks sometimes (and I've been watching 13 Reasons Why too, so I've gotten my fill of asshole teens), but there's no depth to Tia. Tia's anger is as a result of the fact that they moved from Indianapolis to Chicago (at least I believe they do), but there's no real reason outside of that. Tia, for one reason or another, hates her mother. Buck has no time winning over the youngest children of the house, Miles and Maizy, he has a harder time with Tia, the typical 80s angsty teen. Uncle Buck is irresponsible and has no job, so the sister-in-law is worried that having take care of the children could end up disastrously. The basic gist of it is that Uncle Buck comes over to his brother's and sister-in-law's house to take of their children while they go back home as the sister-in-law's father has had a heart attack. The story set-up is fairly simple and straightforward, you've certainly seen a variation of this movie before and since. This movie, while certainly not perfect, is more consistent as it relates to comedy. Problem with Big, as much as I did enjoy it, was that I felt it wasn't as consistent with its comedy and that held it back, a bit, to me. I think I actually enjoyed it more than Big. What did I think of the movie? Much like Big, a film I reviewed a couple of days ago, I enjoyed this movie. Anyway, that's neither here nor there. So, realistically speaking, while he was part of some memorable films, his 'success' as a box office draw wasn't even that long, since the 90s up until his death weren't great for the guy. I'm honestly surprised that, before this movie, John Candy's transition to film hadn't exactly translated to box office success. Well, actually, I do believe I saw it when I was younger, like maybe when was from the ages of 8-13, but it's been so long by this point (I'm 29), that it's almost like I'm watching it for the first time. This is another one of those movies that I remember seeing bits and pieces of on TV, but I never actually saw in its entirety. Anyway, on to this flick. Damn, I miss John Candy so much. The closest thing we have to John Candy in this generation is Melissa McCarthy, though McCarthy isn't afraid to do raunchier stuff where she's kind of a dick to people. John Candy would be offended at this. And that's the difference between the two and why, really, they should never be compared to one another. He knew what to say and when to say it. Candy had great presence, timing and delivery. Candy, on the other hand, while I'm not saying the fact that he wasn't fat wasn't used to, maybe, poke fun at him a little bit, he didn't rely entirely on that. He also does not have the best timing or delivery. The latter relies almost entire on 'fatty fall down' slapstick comedy or, generally, just making fun of the fact that he's fat (watch Grown Ups 2 for this). That's not the problem though, the problem comes in the fact of Candy's comedic style versus James' style. He gives off the appearance of being likable, but it's clearly a farce. There's just no way around it. Where I come to disagree is the fact that, quite frankly, Kevin James is a horrible comedic actor. I can see that. So far, so good. Both typically play (or played in Candy's case) a fat, jovial man who was, typically, just trying to do the right thing. While I completely disagree with this assessment, I can sort of see why some might think that. I even shudder to compare the two and I feel dirty even mentioning the two in the same sentence. I don't know, I don't usually care to read forums, it's just not what I like, but I'm assuming there's some people out there (because there's always at least ONE person) that feel that Kevin James is this generation's version of John Candy. Here's a comparison that no asked for that I'm gonna do anyway


Logan M (mx)

Kevin Smith's deepest film by far


Luigi D (br)

erfect cinema from any standpoint!. . . One of my favorite movies ever. Thespians Ida Kaminska and Josef Kroner elevate this unique and incredibly gorgeous film to the stars. An intimate movie that trascends to epic proportions due to its remarkable camerawork, the originality of its script, and its universal approach to the "human condition" tested under the most horrible circumstances


Michael T (br)

A good cast in a muddled movie


ryan b (fr)

. . the characters are put in unlikely situations, that are not funny if you catch this on cable i would say if you like Jamie Foxx keep it on but if your not a bigg fan its a no go Plot Summary: While they're on vacation in the Southwest, Rae finds out her man Michael spent their house money on a classic car. I really had no expectations going into this movie,The script is unfunny,with my expectations being very, very low, it doesn't really mean that the film is anything more than average. was not that good im reviewing this movie cos no one has