Raiders of the Lost Shark

Raiders of the Lost Shark

Four friends set out by boat for an idyllic vacation on a private, remote island. But unknown to them, a weaponized shark has escaped from a top secret military lab nearby, a shark that was genetically engineered with hate in its blood, and programmed to hunt any human within range. Now, these friends must band together to battle an all new brand of predator who will stop at nothing to remain at the top of the food chain.

Four friends set out by boat for an idyllic vacation on a private, remote island. But unknown to them, a weaponized shark has escaped from a top secret military lab nearby, a shark that was genetically engineered with hate in its blood, and programmed to hunt any human within range. Now, these friends must band together to battle an all new brand of predator who will stop at nothing to remain at the top of the food chain. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Raiders of the Lost Shark torrent reviews

Mattias E (br) wrote: In semi-documentary 24 City Jia Zhang Ke laments the demise of state-owned factories in post-planned economy China and it's severe effect on people's lives. Jia injects heavy doses of nostalgia into the picture by constant references to Chinese popculture and some great soundtrack choices, all filtered through subtle hints of irony. However, I admit that the verfremdungseffekt aimed for by having actors like Joan Chen being interviewed as "real" people is somewhat wasted on me. Yu Likwai's cinematography is magnificently crisp, though.

J K (gb) wrote: 20 bucks ILM didn't do the special effects this movie. If a reputable graphics house isn't involved I don't want to see it.

Paavo L (kr) wrote: positiivinen yllatys. selvasti keskivertoa parempi jannari.

Farah R (ag) wrote: A lighthearted and charming movie despite its flaws. Very enjoyable to watch a friend.

Frances H (br) wrote: Enthralling drama of one man's journey from injustice through violent revolt to redemption and forgiveness--a man who comes to realize that two wrongs don't make a right, life's most valuable lesson that many never learn.

Sam G (ca) wrote: It requires a special kind of stupid to make a movie this bad. This is without a doubt the worst horror movie I've ever seen, and one of the worst movies I've ever seen. There are countless plot holes and inconsistencies, and it borrows heavily from The Ring; the protagonist has a certain amount of time to solve the mystery behind an urban legend before she is killed. The explanations for what was going on in the movie were so lame. Some stuff wasn't explained at all. There is also an extremely high amount of jump scares, all of which make you roll your eyes. One was so bad that the loud noise didn't match up with the "scary image". You'd think there'd at least be a little bit of tension to compensate for the lame jump scares, but there's a shortage on that too. You don't care about any of the characters because they're introduced, then killed of in about 5 minutes. You definitely want to miss this call.

terry a (ca) wrote: Fucking Bat Shit Crazy

luis l (de) wrote: this is my second favorite movie and it is so good because you have no idea how its going to end. also, the fun with drugs scenes are hilarious

Kia M (gb) wrote: A good, simple, old-fashioned crime story that marked the debut of acclaimed filmmaker Paul Thomas Anderson.Sydney (Philip Baker Hall) is an experienced gambler in Las Vegas who comes across the down-on-his-luck John (John C. Reilly), who is in need of six thousand dollars to bury his mother. Reluctantly, John agrees to be taught by Sydney how to make it in Vegas, and two years on is doing well and has a new friend, Jimmy (Samuel L. Jackson) who Sydney doesn't like. John also falls for cocktail waitress and prostitute Clementine (Gwyneth Paltrow), but it's not long before the two find themselves in a sticky situation where the only one who can help fix it is the sympathetic, resourceful Sydney.While viewing Hard Eight, I was reminded often of another crime story (or stories), that being Pulp Fiction (1994). In both cases, the writing is sharp, clever, and rather than having the characters explain things to each other all the time like most story-driven crime movies, the ones here simply talk the way they normally would, the way most people talk in real life. This way, the characters and the situations they find themselves in are much more realistic and fun to watch.The performances here are all done with sincerity by very talented character-actors, especially Philip Baker Hall. I've seen and remembered his face in bit roles in other movies, but now I know to look out for him in other films and that he can be a powerful leading man. Other Anderson regulars Reilly and Philip Seymour Hoffman (in a memorable little scene midway through the film) show here the kind of potential that the director taps into in his future films. I was hoping for more from Jackson's character, but for what he was given he does well, and its a nice follow-up to his performance in Pulp Fiction.Story here is minimal and only serves as a backdrop for the actors and writing to shine, and to allow Anderson to utilize many shooting techniques including tracking shots, zoom-ins, and close-ups that will be used in his later films to greater effect. Sure, it's style over substance, but when it's done well it's hard to refuse.

Charles P (gb) wrote: The search for King Solomon's Mines, a sign-language-fluent gorilla, and Laura Linney saving the day with a laser gun. Just don't see it.

D M (es) wrote: A spaceship from the fast approaching Planet X (Nibiru?) lands in the Scottish Moors near a space observatory. The alien inside uses mind control to turn his host humans into brain dead zombies after he feels slighted by a human scientist's curiosity. Released before the big name sci-fi flicks which started the craze during this era (e.g., Invaders from Mars, The War of the Worlds, When Worlds Collide, The Thing from Another World ), this B movie is creative, well acted, and decently directed. The limited budget keeps it from attaining the heights of its potential, but is still worth a watch.

Brian P (nl) wrote: Waste of TIME!! Very Weak movie, DO NOT WATCH, if you do end up watching it, side effects may include: Suicide, murder ramapages, road ramapage, any kinds of ways of harming yourself, and many others...

Felix B (it) wrote: FINALLY!!! A hilarious parody!