The adopted son of a preacher comes upon a village that is under the thumb of a deranged ex-Confederate officer, who is - among other things - stealing land from the locals with phony land grants.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:92 minutes
  • Release:1967
  • Language:Italian
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:prostitute,   scar,   fire,  

The son of a Mexican bandit comes upon a village that is under the thumb of a deranged former Confederate officer, who is--among other things--stealing land from the locals with phony land grants. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Requiescant torrent reviews

Elisa G (fr) wrote: i love it and i want tge and need the poster truth.

John D (es) wrote: I see it as propaganda towards men.

Thomas D (ru) wrote: I'm as big of a fan of the Fast & Furious as anybody, but there's no question the low point of the series is the 2nd and 3rd film. 2 Fast 2 Furious is in large part just a complete rehash of the first film, but without the fun action and fun cheesy lines. The film attempts to do both of those, but fails miserably.Paul Walker is back as Brian O'Conner, the now former cop turned undercover agent, but instead of Dominic Toretto he's joined by Roman Pearce, played by Tyrese Gibson. Their chemistry is undeniable, but their acting? Yeah, it's not exactly Oscar caliber. Of course, I'm not expecting any of these movies to win academy awards, but I shouldn't cringe watching their acting for a good portion of the film. Eva Mendes also joins the cast this time, as a useless character that somewhat pines after O'Conner but is more or less just there as eye candy for the audience. Which pretty much describes the entire movie. It's nice to look at, but there's absolutely no point to this film.O'Conner & Pearce are hired by the FBI to infiltrate and take down criminal, Carter Verone, who plans to sell drugs and steal money, I think. We don't learn much about Verone, and he's pretty much your standard prototypical B-movie villain. Again, those adjectives can describe the overall quality of the film, standard and prototypical. Besides an occasional drag race or bland action sequence, I'm not sure what's really happening in this film. Why do we even care?It's the worst acted, written, and directed of the entire series, by far. When I go back and watch Tokyo Drift that could change, but I remember liking this film more the first time I watched it. Despite looking kind of neat, the action is sub-par. And that's the centerpiece of this franchise. If you're not already selling the film on acting or story, then you need something to keep my attention. Oh, and there's also this random torture scene that doesn't fit in at all with the rest of the film tonally. 2 Fast 2 Furious is borderline unwatchable.+Beautiful locations & cars-But that amounts to nothing film-wise-Poor acting, writing, and directing-Rehash of the first film4.0/10

Jack Z (us) wrote: lol. love the intro!

Private U (au) wrote: Puppets, promiscuity and the Bastille. If you can get your hands on a copy you should definitely watch it.

Charlie G (nl) wrote: Adventure. Nice scenery. Liked the story line. Liked the actors.

Lisa S (ca) wrote: A very interesting movie, both funny and serious, dealing with issues of women balancing work and home life. It's a good movie.

Justin W (gb) wrote: it's supposed to be some commentary on scientific research...i guess it's supposed to make you believe that anything that science creates may seem nice at first...but it'll eventually become evil and murder people. overall, it's an average film with several nice spots to heavily make fun of what you're watching. it they tried less to make it a commentary and more to make it entertaining, though, i think this film could have been much better than it actually was.

Dustin R (mx) wrote: Crazy John Agar. My favorite early sci-fi because it's so damn bizarre.

Collin P (fr) wrote: An interesting, haunting, in depth look at the crime side of cities with intriguing dialogue and plot points that isn't afraid to shy away from the big themes.

Mario G (ru) wrote: Larga vida a la nueva carne.

Cynthia S (ru) wrote: This movie was better than I thought. Suspenseful and holds the interest throughout the entire movie. Good ending as it brings almost everything together. Some things I was still puzzled about, but all in all I love movies like this. Not oscar worthy, just pure entertainment and suspense.