Originally an absurdist play by Eugene Ionesco, Rhinoceros tells the story of a French town plagued by rhinoceroses. These are not ordinary rhinoceroses, but people who have been victims of "rhinoceritis." Or is it something else entirely? But, why are they turning into rhinoceroses and what is Ionesco trying to tell us about society?
- Stars:Zero Mostel, Gene Wilder, Karen Black, Joe Silver, Robert Weil, Marilyn Chris, Percy Rodrigues, Robert Fields, Melody Santangello, Don Calfa, Lou Cutell, Howard Morton, Manuel Aviles, Anne Ramsey, Lorna Thayer,
- Country:UK, Canada, USA
- Director:Tom O'Horgan,
- Writer:Eugène Ionesco (play), Julian Barry (screenplay)
A boozing young man in love with his co-worker finds that everyone around him, even his pompous and condescending best friend, is changing into a rhinoceros. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Rhinoceros torrent reviews
(ag) wrote: The movie is overstuffed with too many plot-lines and is unable to make the most out of juggling them. It's unfocused and messy, but there are some genuinely amazing and powerful stand-out moments in the film.
(jp) wrote: Blah. Pretty uninteresting. Got distracted most of the movie. Dave Matthews....stick to the Dave Matthews Band. Sissy Spacek was the only interesting part of the film...but she couldn't save it. I'm even writing this review before the film is done...cuz I'm kinda bored. It's just pretty thin of a film.
(mx) wrote: Not the typical movie I'd prefer watching, but this was a brilliantly told story about two of the most intelligent physicists of the 1940s. Not much action and a whole lot of talking between the three main characters, but I enjoyed it still.
(kr) wrote: Horribly suspenseful. Almost painful to watch.
(br) wrote: this film has some very funny moments, definitely has independent film written all over it. Marisa Tomei and Alan Arkin are very good in their respective roles. highly recommended.
(de) wrote: Horror spoof with family inheriting and moving into a cursed home in Eerie Pennsylvania. Laughs are sparse although Jeffrey Tambor somewhat managaes to rise above the awful material. Only 75 mins but seems much longer.
(ag) wrote: Sergio Leone's sophomore film in his Spaghetti Western trilogy and is a major step up from A Fistful of Dollars. This was a film that didn't appeal to me, the first time I have watched it but as I watch it more and more along with others within the trilogy, I start to see the great things about this film. For A Few Dollars More is much more bigger and a much more better written film than it's predecessor.For A Few Dollars More was written by both Leone and Luciano Vincenzoni. Both have written a story that is engaging and this is due to a plot with much bigger stakes, and rewards, and also much better written characters. This film fleshes out the characters much more than it's predecessors, taking it's time to show each person's agenda and their personalities, yet Leone and Vincenzoni still has kept the unpredictability that was found in the first film. Oddly enough, even though Eastwood's character is the main star, the film's emotional significance was much more apparent on Mortimer and El Indio. Their back story is the reason that I care about these characters, it tells us why they are who they are. For A Few Dollars More's script has it's humor pumped up in comparison to the first film and I felt that this work. It actually gives the film much more character and helps not make the tone of the film too negative.Sergio Leone has created a film that is much more cinematic and traditional in comparison to the first film but at the same time not trading off the uniqueness of the first film, which was the slow building tension and the close ups of people's faces focusing on their reactions and the emotional facial acting by the actors. This film does increase the beat of the film, with editing that moves the film along at a pace that keeps us on our toes. Leone has definitely have gained much more confidence going towards this film as the film doesn't feel as indulgent as the first and seemed to show much more enjoyment with the story than the first film. This film's budget was much higher than the first film which allowed him to create settings that feel real and lively.Massimo Dallamano is back as the cinematographer of this film. The film looks much better than the first film and this may be due to the increase in budget and shot at better locations or it could be due to Dallamano and Leone has a much better understanding of what they want for this film. The film still retains that style from the first film with close ups that take it's time to move things along but it's much more improved here as they have used different angles and techniques in constructing these shots, allowing them to feel fresh. Dallamano has the camera move in this film much more than the first. The first film has it's shots set up in a way that doesn't require the camera to move or zoom into anything. This movement makes the film move faster and exciting.Ennio Morricone comes back to do the score for this film and it's just as great as the first one. The score here sounds much more fuller and dramatic, this may be due to a much larger story and much more characters focused on. Morricone's score here may not be as memorable as the first or third film but it definitely fits with what is shown on screen and it doesn't feel recycled. The film's score feels fast and upbeat, which sound great in moments of the film that have characters riding their horses on the beautiful backdrops. Morricone also has a much lighter and smaller track that plays during the build up of climax, the music that comes from the lockets. It sounds beautiful and it connects with the emotional weight during these situations.The film's cast is much bigger in this film and the film is now shared with three characters rather than a main focus on Eastwood. Clint Eastwood is great here as expected but not as memorable as A Fistful of Dollars. Lee Van Cleef brings something different to the film which gives the film much more personality. Leone loves to have actors banter in his films and it's definitely apparent here with the focus on the friendship on both Eastwood and Cleef's characters. Both actors work well together and it's a shame that this isn't the case for the next film. Gian Maria Volonte is back for this film as the antagonist, this time his character is much better written and his acting is much more effective but it may not appeal to everyone as he has increased the dramatics in this film in comparison to the first film.For A Few Dollars More is a much better constructed film than A Fistful of Dollars with a bigger and better story and improvements on the acting and photography. The film is great to watch on its own and does not require to watch the first or third film to understand but if you have seen the other films you get to pick up on the small things that Leone has put in this film.
(fr) wrote: heroin couple,love,nice images,everything for it,junkies,exiety,even sell her body,family knows-marriage,personal trouble,giving in-using it as excuse,he still narrating,big score!cold turkey-horrible thing-all for nothing.turning point-she narrates-hell-chapters,focus only on use and coping-all there is-still nice view at life-like not how they move.keep thinking the right thing to do would be...but ya know it must be impossible-points out that they make the right choice in the end
(it) wrote: Beautiful visuals but an overly sappy story with some extreme melodramatic acting really make What Dreams May Come a movie that can be overlooked without any guilt.
(mx) wrote: Looked like garbage once I saw the trailer.