Romy and Michele's High School Reunion
Two not-too-bright party girls reinvent themselves for their high school reunion. Armed with a borrowed Jaguar, new clothes and the story of their success as the inventors of Post-It notes, Romy and Michele descend on their alma mater, but their façade crumbles quickly.
Ten years after their high school graduation, Romy and Michele haven't exactly accomplished everything that they set out to do. They decide to hit the road for their 10-year high school reunion and concoct an elaborate lie about their lives in order to impress their classmates. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Romy and Michele's High School Reunion torrent reviews
(gb) wrote: It was actually pretty good. If it weren't for the two migraine strobe light scenes it would have got 4 stars. The vampiress was smoking along with the scenes. Peter was cheesy. But overall it has familiar rings of the first one.......which I'm a huge fan of. Its entertaining, see it.
(br) wrote: teen titans is awesome.
(fr) wrote: Get on board, people. This is going to be hilarious for SO many reasons, for people of all sexualities.
(ru) wrote: Though the first Tomb Raider film was mediocre at best, with Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life being considered an improvement over its predecessor I decided to give it a shot.Overall, I felt like Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life was pretty close to its predecessor in terms of quality. The general style of the film felt a bit better due to to Jan De Bont taking over for Simon West resulting in better action scenes and less reliance on CGI, but it still fails to make up for the nature of the story. I'll admits that Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life is certainly one better example of a film adaptation of a video game, but as a film it really does come up short in many areas.Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life attempts to be a more competent film by avoiding many of the ridiculous fantasy elements from its predecessor, but in the process it gets so caught up attempting to take itself seriously that it forgets how to be a genuinely fun film. There is certainly a sense of joy that comes from the action scenes, but Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life largely feels too much like just another action film with little to transcend much else by comparison. It may succeed as a guilty pleasure for some, but the ludicrious nature of the plot is ridiculous, yet made all the more worse by the fact that the fun elements of Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life play second fiddle to its less competent elements such as the script and the story. To make matters worse, the film runs for a total of 117 minutes. Like I said, Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life is an improvement over Lara Croft: Tomb Raider. But there are areas where it cannot help but come up short. The film is 17 minutes longer, yet it gets so caught up with its insufficient drama that it ends up feeling stretched for a lot longer. And although its predecessor has a large overkill of visual effects, at least it knew how to keep moving along and have some kind of fun in the process. It tried to mirror the video game in that regard, and even though it didn't carry over to film all that well it still worked significantly better than Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life did at attempting to be a legitimate action flick. All in all, the problem is simply that Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life takes itself too seriously even though its source material is a video game.The one thing I will admit though is that the action in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life is significantly superior to its predecessor. While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider had a lot of CGI overkill as the source of its action, Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life relies more on choreographing actual stunts and such. The visual effects are still there, but they are moderated a lot better. This means that Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life feels more genuine as a film, and even though the action is sporadic in comparison to the story, whenever the action kicks off Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life finds a way to give viewers the fun thrill that they came to watch. The action in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life is entertaining due to strong cinematography and editing really grasping the choreography of it all while the sound effects and soundtrack make the experience all the more effective as a whole.The cast in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life prove to make a decent effort as well.While in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider Angelina Jolie's accent felt so artificial, in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life it feels very much real. This shows that Angelina Jolie has progressed well as an actress and learned to get a grasp on her character by really working on making her convincing. This is interesting because I often find Angelina Jolie to be a severely overrated actress and her performance in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider failed to appeal to me, yet in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life she really improves upon herself. She puts more of herself into the character by engaging with the action a lot more and delivering her lines in a manner which seems significantly more organic. Once again, she makes a strong impact as an action hero due to the way she is able to grasp her weapons with confidence and perform stunts without using a CGI stunt double, as well as the fact that her character seems more legitimate this time around due to less emphasis on her sex appeal. Angelina Jolie delivers a strong effort in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life and really manages to improve upon herself.Gerard Butler is also a welcome presence. Although he is stuck with a thinly sketched character, there is a certain sense of entertainment that comes from seeing Gerard Butler get in on the action in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life. It is interesting to look back at him from before his career became an international success simply because the macho archetype of his character demands little from him and he is able to deliver on that without problem. Gerard Butler easily embraces his role in Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life and knows how to interact with Angelina Jolie well.So Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life features an effective central performance from Angelina Jolie and improved action scenes from its predecessor, but the story is incompetent and it does not know how to have fun which means it ends up milking too much drama and running for too long.
(kr) wrote: It was okay, not too terrible but Angelina is better suited for the action/adventure/thriller genre rather than romantic comedies, although I had to admit she is blindingly stunning in this film or maybe it's just her Marilyn, platinum coif. Ed Burns is cute and Tony Shalhoub is always entertaining. This is just cute but nothing special than your average formula-rom-com. So eh....
(au) wrote: Still such a classic after all these years
(kr) wrote: I will say that I like Kieslowski's later films more, such as the Three Colours trilogy or the Double Life of Veronique, but this was still an interesting look at the beginnings of an obsession for filmmakers. Some funny satire on dealing with a corporation.
(jp) wrote: When Fellini movies starting becoming acid trips.
(au) wrote: this is a really good hit