Carefree Chuck Connor is on his way west and stops off to see an old friend and his four lads. When his host is killed in a riding accident Chuck realises he must take care of the family. They hit the road and he takes a job on a ranch, but he has to keep the children hidden as his boss hates kids. There's also tension with the neighbouring ranch, and when a girl on the run from her nasty uncle joins the family unannounced Chuck wonders what he has done to deserve all this.
- Stars:Joel McCrea, Wanda Hendrix, John Russell, John McIntire, Jeanette Nolan, Russell Simpson, Ed Begley, Jimmy Hunt, Orley Lindgren, Gordon Gebert, Gregory Moffett, Antonio Moreno, John Ridgely, Walter Coy, Joaquin Garay,
- Director:Hugo Fregonese,
Carefree Chuck Connor is on his way west and stops off to see an old friend and his four lads. When his host is killed in a riding accident Chuck realises he must take care of the family. ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Saddle Tramp torrent reviews
(ag) wrote: Another one of those movies where Michael Keaton is by far the best thing in the movie. And again shows he's great at being a sociopath, I just wish one of these movies was as good as his performance as it stands Pacific Heights is probably the best of his thrillers.
(it) wrote: there was really nothing to it
(mx) wrote: Yet another tired rehash on the old Prom Night/I Know What You Did Last Summer formula. A group of kids cause the death of a friend and years later someone starts knocking them off. Yep, that's about it. No real surprises or originality to hold your attention. Thankfully what the movie lacks in story it makes up for in direction and performances. Dead In 3 Days is easily one of the best directed and most stylish horror films I've seen in recent years. And the actors all do good jobs with their cardboard characters and actually look the age of the characters they're portraying. A rare thing in horror films these days. I wanted to like this movie more than I actually did just because it was so great to look at, but the lack of any originality or gore makes Dead In 3 Days just an okay movie.
(gb) wrote: pelcula de esas televisivas que proveen un rato de mente en blanco
(es) wrote: Breath taking performances from Redford and Brad Pitt in this sattire of bravery, honor, and the dedication that goes into being a NOC in the Central Intelligence Agency downrange in one of the most dangerous areas in the world.
(jp) wrote: it will blow your mind.
(us) wrote: Classic cheesy 80s movie. I'd forgotten some of the 80s fashion tragedy... However, the story line has a ring of truth to it. How many of us have fallen for our best friend only to watch them fall for the wrong person. All though this ended "happily ever after" many of us never find that ending... cute movie if you're up for cheesy. And how is it that Lori Laughlin looks exactly the same today as she did then?
(au) wrote: By far the best of all the Star Trek movies, new or old.
(mx) wrote: This is a film that's practically canon in gay film history with its sensitive and thoughtful portrayal of a married man coming out and accepting his homosexuality. I was more impressed and moved by this film than I expected to be (especially since I intended to watch it only to fuel my love affair with Kate Jackson). Making Love is well-done and compelling, but its stakes are also crystal clear: the film wants to dissuade its audience from the notion of a homosexuality as a perversion and so a few moments that would have made the film more 'real' get left by the wayside. While we all may dream of having as understanding a wife (or husband) as Jackson's character--who, after only a minor breakdown, decides she really just wants her husband to find happiness, even if its not with her--her relative compassion for the situation does seem a bit out of place. And even though I prefer a little more veracity in my social consciousness-raising films, I can respect a film that wants to secure sympathy for all its characters and not allow either the gay men or the jilted wife to seem villains. Overall, completely worth-seeing, and not just because of Jackson?s appeal.
(us) wrote: I LOVED IT it was so beautiful and I cried a lot omg
(mx) wrote: Chris Evans is quality in this! Good film!
(kr) wrote: This was not a bad movie, but I have to ask - was there anything memorable about it? Can anyone say, "I know Hollywood keeps making the same kind of movies, but *this* is different?" I really want to have a conversation with any such person.
(au) wrote: Brilliantly terrible, bad dubbing, bad acting, bad editing, terrible camera work. Hilarious, must see for its pure entertainment value.