You may also like
Sagolandet torrent reviews
Marcio R (es) wrote: The first Ezra's movie... And yeah, it's really interesting and freaking disturbing sometimes, like his character itself, but sometimes is really slow and ambiguous, with a strange but symbolic, end.
Konrad A (nl) wrote: Mr woodcock is a inappropriate but funny movie this movie made me laugh a lot this movie is PG13. But there is humor in this movie I had a favorite line in this movie it was a lot of losers out there I guess that was my favorite line. This movie will teach you to try to get a long with people. Billybob Thorton is a funny actor. I do not recommend this movie to kids
Jessica M (it) wrote: Really a beautiful film... the characters are accessible and the story is moving. My first Czech film and it made me want to see more!
Cedric L (us) wrote: A weird movie that is maybe worth watching.
Pedrito F (au) wrote: Bald McConaughey chewing cigars and fighting a flaming dragon face off will make you laugh hard. This movie is so bad and wrong in so many aspects is worthy a watch. Uwe Bol said it was an inspiration for him.
Moya W (it) wrote: I thought the movie was okay, I sure did watch it until the end although the ending was just the way you would've expected. A few parts were boring and it's hard getting into it. Half an hour has passed by the time you start enjoying it a little. The storyline was great though but I wouldn't see it again.
Lord N (nl) wrote: Well, it's a step up from my last one, but it really doesn't reach the level of scream or Black Christmas or anything like that. Acting: They have some decent actors in here. I am always a fan of Michael Biehn after Terminator and Aliens. The late-who-knows-if-she-could-have-been-really-great Brittany Murphy is in here too. The acting is not too horrible. At the very least, it goes beyond the typical "I'm gonna scream and wait for the rapidly approaching killer to get me" stuff. It's always nice to have a break from that. The teenagers in this one have a little personality to them and some of them you actually grow to like. That is rare for a film like this. it wasn't too horrible. It wasn't fantastic either but it was alright. 6.5/10 Plot: Now, this is one of the most original plots I have seen out of a slasher film. I know, there is still the underlying "killer kills everyone he/she/it gets his/her/its hands on" thing but the film doesn't rely solely on that like films such as Halloween 2. Granted, it was a plot that, in its very basic form, was going to be done sooner or later but it is still an original one. Glad another original plot exists to be honest. It wasn't perfect but it was decent. 7/10 Screenplay: Not too good. As with most films it is the weakest aspect of the film. But I suppose that it was alright. There were some good lines there were some bad ones. nothing that's going to make you cringe or that you're going to include on a list of top 100 movie quotes but eeh. whatever. 6/10 Likableness: I kinda liked it. It was an entertaining way to spend 1 1/2 hours or so. It wasn't a perfect film but it is better than the average piece of slasher film trash. 7.5/10 Final Score: 27/40 67% (D) TRIVIA TIME: 1. Stephen Lang was originally offered the role of Sheriff Marken, but scheduling conflicts prevented him from being in the film. He later admitted that the only reason he wanted to do the part was to work with Brittany Murphy again. Ted Levine was also considered for the role of the Sheriff as well. The role eventually went to Michael Biehn. Ironically, Biehn was an early favorite for a military role in James Cameron's Avatar, but Lang ended up getting the part 2. The film was troubled by censor disapproval. It had to be submitted to the MPAA a total of five times before censors finally approved a cut.
ismael r (gb) wrote: Even though Bones may have a few interesting charectors and some stylishly creepy moments,it doesent stop itself from being a slow and ridiculously silly horror film.
(de) wrote: I never really quite clicked with this one, and I think that's because this is the only QT movie he didn't invent the story for. It's well made and the performances are memorable but there's not much in the storyline that resonates with me......
Adam M (ag) wrote: Hilariously subversive and campy.
Steve S (au) wrote: *** (out of four) Well made historical account of the efforts to bring in the infamous Apache Chief, Geronimo. Wes Studi is good in the title role, but all the actors are well cast.
Jeff W (it) wrote: Super low grade Fulci, totally one of his worst outings. This films only saving grace is Giovanni Frezza (Bob from House By The Cemetary), and even as great as he is he can't help push this over 1 star.
Nathan H (br) wrote: If it involves Gene Wilder, it's worthwhile.
Heri C (kr) wrote: Nadie dijo que el neorrealismo italiano tenia que ser divertido.