Sakuya: Slayer of Demons (2000) torrents full movies


Sakuya: Slayer of Demons

The eruption of Mt. Fuji in 1707 released hordes of demons from deep inside the earth. Sakuya, the young daughter of a samurai killed fighting these demons, accepts a mission to travel to ...

Sakuya: Slayer of Demons is a new movie of Tomo'o Haraguchi (story). This movie was introduced in 2000. There are many actors in this movie torrents, for example Nozomi Andô, Kyûsaku Shimada, Keiko Matsuzaka, Moeko Ezawa, Hiroshi Fujioka, Hidehiko Ishikura, Tamami Kaneko, Masaki Katô, Yûki Kuroda, Keiichirou Sakaki, Naoto Takenaka, Tetsurô Tanba, Shin'ya Tsukamoto, Shuichi Yamauchi, Keiko Yoshida. Movie' genres are Fantasy. The rating is 5.2 in This is really a good movie torrents. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 88 minutes. NickDan is interesting uploader, he is very lovely. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Excited', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are customers? Maria Ozawa is the best. I don't push my laptop screen. Please support us via sharing this movies to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

. . Sakuya, the young daughter of a samurai killed fighting these demons, accepts a mission to travel to . Fuji in 1707 released hordes of demons from deep inside the earth. The eruption of Mt

Sakuya: Slayer of Demons torrents

Sakuya: Slayer of Demons full movie

Sakuya: Slayer of Demons2000 torrent

Sakuya: Slayer of Demons torrent, Sakuya: Slayer of Demons movie torrents, download Sakuya: Slayer of Demons full movie, Sakuya: Slayer of Demons2000 torrents, download Sakuya: Slayer of Demons2000 torrents, watch Sakuya: Slayer of Demons movie, Sakuya: Slayer of Demons englishsub, free download Sakuya: Slayer of Demons movie, movie Sakuya: Slayer of Demons torrent

Download   Sakuya: Slayer of DemonsOther46364 GB

You may also like

Users reviews

Jed D (nl)

His performance along with a superb supporting cast consisting of Keith David (They Live, Marked for Death) Michael Rapaport (True Romance, Higher Learning) and Michael Lerner(For Richer For Poorer, Newsies) were perfect for this film. Despite a horrible career for Chris O'Donnell, 29 Palms was simply one of the most enjoyable movies I've seen in a long time

Jeff B (kr)

Not terrible but certainly not something to write home about, if you will. Again, promise of something of merit and import is just left cold on the table. And finally, why the old man came forward to tell Jansen that he had plagiarised his book is never given a satisfactory reason. Wha--?. OK, the Jansens's were happy. The final scene between Hammond and his love interest Daniella seemed to actually be going for something a little ethereal, some mystery, merit, and depth, but then the conclusion is just plunked in the viewer's lap at the end. Right? Oh well. This just sounded like a writer who doesn't know how to write talking about how a writer writes. ") Writers are often told to just get to the point, don't bore the reader, but maybe screenwriters don't get that same message. All this flowery melodrama just ain't working (Remember Dora's analysis of Rory's book? "In this one, you're just so real. Just tell the guy you wrote the book already. And I love Irons but the story telling just got boring after awhile and seemed to suck the energy out of the room rather than build it, maybe because his part went on too long. The Words wasn't as bad but close. Stuck in Love comes to mind when I think of writers portrayed very unrealistically. We aren't full of angst, drugs and alcohol, or some muse that makes us appear different from anyone else. I've never experienced the tragedy and melodrama most writers in films have, and neither have my writing friends. How do I know? I've been writing for years and have a degree in writing. I don't know what it is about films that portray authors a particular way, but they often seem to get it wrong. Of course you have some wonderful actors here, but the material just seemed a bit strained, as if the film in its attempt to be taken seriously bit off more than it could chew. Hammond who is telling a story about Jansen (Bradley Cooper) who later in the movie is being told a story by the old man (Jeremy Irons). Is he the plagiarized author, the old man, or someone else? For we have a story within a story within a story. The story is being told by an author, Clay Hammond (Dennis Quaid), and as the movie unfolds, one may begin to wonder who the narrator is. We've got a writer (Roy Jansen) who's trying to get published but can't, so he finds a manuscript in an old briefcase bought at a second-hand shop and publishes it as his own. The main issue is that the film tries to be too narrative or a film about fiction too lyrical, and instead of being something of merit, like a best seller, it turns rather pedestrian in the process. I found this film relatively underwhelming

Jessie C (ag)

10Bye love you. I really, really didn't like it but I'm so confused that I didn't enjoy such a widely beloved film so I might try to give it a viewing again but I highly doubt it. By the time it was over I had more questions than I had answers and that is enormously frustrating. Such a bizarre film to me. His acting was over-the-top, in my opinion, at some points, but he really did have something about him that was fascinating. I also did see the spark that has made James Dean so legendary despite his short career/life. The only things I really enjoyed were the aesthetics, and I'm not sure how much credit they should get for that considering the ~aesthetics~ I enjoyed so much were just how things looked back then. Starts out ominous and tense, then after bad things happen, it gets light-hearted and silly. Pacing was so strange. I felt like I came into a movie halfway through, too many details merely implied, too many rapid jumps in story/relationships, just made it frustratingly mysterious for no reason. They tried to do some kind of "let's get this story started and fill in the blanks of his past later," which I've seen work many times, but it just didn't work here. The story-telling was bizarre, also. Seems like something a 1950s Teen Nick might put out for a quick buck or something. That's why I'm surprised this is a classic. Not much substance, but with an exceptionally attractive male displaying both strength and sensitivity- it's a formula to make profit. That's like every Zac Efron movie. It was so dramatic, the story was weak, a vessel for the studio to make money off of Dean more than anything. I didn't feel bad for these kids. I just didn't care. I don't expect every movie to tackle an societal problem, I get that some movies are just fun, but if they wanted to make a drama about a problem, they should have picked something else. I hate to compare negatives (because a negative is a negative and that's that), but there are a multitude of other more important, more devastatingly horrible issues out there. It's a real issue, this painful separation between generations, but this movie was so melodramatic about it. I get that there was an element of emotional neglect from adults, which fueled their teenage debauchery, but it played out like a bunch of spoiled white kids messing everything up for everyone else because they didn't know how to deal with their problems. Bunch of angry suburban kids causing mischief for no reason, essentially. I don't usually pay too much attention to film titles, but this one truly says it all. I read a little bit more about the movie afterward and it enlightened me to the film's strengths that gave it "classic" status, which helped a little bit, but I can't ignore the fact that this was a really annoying movie. I was really annoyed throughout the entire movie. I was really excited about this one because of how iconic James Dean is and because I had never seen something with him in it before, and honestly, I was disappointed

Joel C (gb)


Jordan R (ca)

An almost unnecessarily sad film

Joshua L (mx)

This one ranks along some of the very best. Eerie silent film with ground breaking effects

Katarina I (jp)

soo gross and pointless

Ollie W (us)

Unbelievable debut short which fully deserved its Oscar win. Arnold is a goddess. Estate life in Britain as only they know it. uncomfortable and heartbraking. Fraught

Phillip D (ag)

Beautiful! When Ultraman takes flight at the end you will believe in him! I think this rendition of the M78 hero did a lot with a classic character! Long live the Next!

Phillip W (ca)

Very good movie excellent story highly recommend