#

San Quentin

An army trainer becomes captain of the prison yard and in time, falls for the sister of a hardened inmate.

An army trainer becomes captain of the prison yard and in time, falls for the sister of a hardened inmate

San Quentin is a excited movies torrent of Alexa. This movie was introduced in 1937. There are many actors in this movie torrents, for example Pat O'Brien, Humphrey Bogart, Ann Sheridan, Barton MacLane, Joe Sawyer, Veda Ann Borg, Archie Robbins, Joe King, Gordon Oliver, Garry Owen, Marc Lawrence, Emmett Vogan, William Pawley, Al Hill, Max Wagner. The kind of movie are Film-Noir. Many people rated for this movie, Rate is 6.5 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movie to watch. Please support us via sharing this movies to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

San Quentin torrents

San Quentin full movie

San Quentin 1937 torrent

San Quentin torrent, San Quentin movie torrents, download San Quentin full movie, San Quentin 1937 torrents, download San Quentin 1937 torrents, watch San Quentin movie, San Quentin englishsub, free download San Quentin movie, movie San Quentin torrent

Links Name Quality Seeders Leechers Size
Download   San Quentin (Humphrey Bogart, Hugh O'Brien) [1936] .avi Other 30 32 482.1 MB
Download   1937 San Quentin Humphrey Bogart Other 41 40 1.37 GB

Users reviews


Bill R (gb)

b movie all over it but still a wonderful watch. the movie itself is a great concept and with a low budget, they do a superb job on creating what could be an endless puzzle. watching it today, still no change. I remember watching this year's ago on a late night sci fi channel viewing (before syfy) and finding it entertaining


Borhan K (gb)

I liked the movie its something different. Maybe it should have just been a voice over. The way the filmmaker connected these scenes seemed to be disjointed and caused me to loose focus and track of the story otherwise the movie would be fine. The only thing weird about this movie was the cut scenes to this guru type character that would give relationship and love advice. This is not a movie for the kiddies or for those people with a rigid outlook on the subject discussed in the movie. Love is love regardless of gender. I say who are we to judge its not as if the hetrosexual community has all the answers seeing the divorce rate and all that. The question raised in this movie is would you stay in a loveless marriage or find your true love that maybe seen as an alternative lifestyle in many peoples eyes. This movie will challenge your beliefs if you only see things as black and white or male and female. . . They start having a relationship through photography which leads to more. Elena Undone is about a woman married to a pastor and is in a loveless marriage and through a chance meeting meets another woman


Cliff M (us)

The performances are sincere and you feel their joys, fears and disappointment with every turn. Although not based on a true story, but it plays as if it were


Kelsy M (au)

Blah. My 6-yr-old and 3-yr-old watched it. probably just fine for kids who like Ben 10


Madison O (au)

LOLS. I think I know pretty much every line. This is by far my favorite cartoon movie ever


Mariana L (us)

interesting but disturbing to know so many of them are apparently out there. pretty scary how these people seem to truly believe what they say


Matthew P (it)

It's not a fun time, though, so if you're looking for a film to cheer you up after a tough day, you'll definitely want to pick something else. Even so, if you haven't already exhausted your quota of anti-drug films, or if you're a fan of either Heath Ledger or Abbie Cornish, I think it's worth a watch. Candy is a good film that is severely lacking in originality. Rush is also good, although in a more background role, he doesn't get the material to really shine. They are fantastic, and even though their characters aren't exactly likable or endearing, just watching the actors dissolve in them makes you want to see more -- even if it's not pleasant. That is, unless you're a fan of either Heath Ledger or Abbie Cornish, in which case you'll want to watch it just to see their performances in this film. So, if you're tired of films about people abusing drugs and suffering for it, you'll probably want to skip Candy. It doesn't bring much to the table in terms of originality. You'll have seen the majority of the things in this film before assuming you've seen one or two similar movies in the past. Being very clich (for this type of film) also makes it difficult to recommend. It's just not the type of film that you are supposed to enjoy, which instantly makes it difficult to recommend. It's because of the tone and nature of Candy that it's hard to actually "like" or enjoy it. It's not quite as grim an experience as something like Requiem for a Dream, but it's right up there. This is an anti-drug film, let me remind you. The "Hell" section of the film is likely going to play out similarly to how you'd expect. Not necessarily a bad thing, but I always like seeing Geoffrey Rush and would have liked more from him. This film is more concerned about the lives of these two young characters than it is about an old man. There's a background character played by Geoffrey Rush who provides money and drugs for these people (he's likened to a "cool" father), although he is underutilized. This is where the real descent occurs. It's also the longest, as you'd expect from a three-act narrative. "Earth" is the phase that contains most of the action of the film. For instance, they have run out of money, so they begin stealing, prostituting, fighting with one another over the simplest things, and life doesn't seem all that fun. It's only as we begin to get to the "Earth" phase that things begin crashing down. They get high a lot, borrow money from friends and family, and they don't have a care in the world. " To be fair, most of the "Heaven" section works out fine for our leads. Sure is like "Heaven. Boy, isn't this fun? A character has already almost died. She decides to get high in the bathtub, but ends up passing out, only to be woken up by the cautious Dan. She wants to inject, for whatever reason (a better high?), but Dan convinces her not to. Dan injects, but Candy still only snorts it. Dan (Heath Ledger) and Candy (Abbie Cornish) are in love, but they're also heroin users. We begin in "Heaven," although the film's opening scene is anything but. This is a story that could be told without the phases, and we would be unable to pick a spot to place the title cards. But categorizing them puts an expectation that there will be a noticeable shift in tone, which simply wasn't the case here. You know, "Heaven" would be pure bliss, "Earth" would be the beginning of the come down, and "Hell" would be the worst part, either because the characters are so addicted at this point that there's no saving them, or because they're trying to get help but can't due to any number of reasons. You would almost expect each of the phases to tell a distinct story. " I'm not sure if this actually made the film any better, but it is worth noting if only because it shows us that Candy isn't trying to hide anything from the audience; it knows exactly what it wants to draw your attention to, even if it has to pause the film and give us a single word to do so. We begin the film in "Heaven," and slowly transition to "Earth" and eventually to "Hell. Now, this happens in most of these kinds of films, but actually drawing attention to it is interesting. The other thing that Candy does differently is separating the different stages that the characters go through for the audience. That's very nave of them, but at least you can admire their spirit. They just don't care, or believe that being addicted to a drug is going to significantly alter anything about them. No, in this film, at the very least, the two younger characters are ready to admit that quite early on. "Oh, we're not addicts," they say before snorting another line. If there's anything fresh about Candy, it's the fact that its characters never enter that annoying denial phase that characters often try to plea. Well, "watchable" might not be the right word, as it's a difficult film to finish just because of the content. We've seen it before, and there's absolutely nothing fresh here, but it's watchable largely because of the performances from the three main actors. It has three main characters, all of whom have their lives altered in some, negative, aspect, before leading to pretty much the only conclusion that these film ever lead to. Candy is another film that's rallying against drug abuse


Mike M (fr)

ot funny at all. This movie is flat out horrible


NMe D (ru)

. In love with this movie! In the world of cryptozology this movie pertrays the legand as an amazing creature


Rebekah L (ru)

To be honest i thought this could have been a lot better,Dont get me wrong it has its very funny moments but the movie overall is really Dull,Ultimately i say SKIP IT!!!