Santa Who?

Santa Who?

Santa Claus develops amnesia after accidentally falling out of his sleigh and only the innocence of a small child can save him. Meanwhile, Santa has to battle the disbelief of a newsman.

Santa suffers a case of amnesia on the eve of his busiest season. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Santa Who? torrent reviews

Akbar C (fr) wrote: Perfectit's the best kids movie of all time I would rate this to adventurous people

JuanKa P (mx) wrote: Behind the candelabra cuenta la historia de Liberace y quien fue el amor de su vida, Scott Thorson. Un pianista, Liberace, viviendo una vida entre lujo, confort, extravagancia, todo una estrella que se presuma sera gay, pero que viva una vida paralela en la dcada de los 70's y 80's donde la homosexualidad era tab y casitgaba con el rechazo social an a sus dolos musicales ms grandes. Liberace era un hombre maduro con 40 aos de carrera que vivi su amor con Thorson, un hombre joven al que prcticamente le doblaba o triplicaba en edad. Una relacin apasionada, pero tambin llena de celos, excesos y problemas en el margo de una ciudad como Las Vegas. Gran actuacin de Michael Douglas (Liberace) y de Matt Damon ( Scott Thorson) con Dan Aykroyd, Rob Lowe.

Indra W (gb) wrote: It is rather depressing, and the title is misleading.

IMDB p (it) wrote: this second movie in the "Bionicle" series of movies is as good as the 1st one.the story is better,and there is more going on.also,the action is more intense and their is some humour here,which the 1st one didn't have.the animation is maybe a bit better,and the villain is a stronger,more developed character,at least i thought so.however,there are a few too many wise proverbs for my taste.after awhile it gets preachy and repetitive.the message of believing in yourself and "the journey of discovery" mantra,though a good message,is a bit heavy handed.this movie has not much to do with the 1st one.the characters are new,but similar to the previous movie.this movie is intended for a slightly older audience than the original,and there's nothing wrong with that.anyway,as i said,despite some problems,this movie is as good as the 1st one.

Tom F (nl) wrote: One hour and a half of nonsense french-ish cliches terribly assembled, with a bunch of stereotyped characters without any psychological depth with zero empathy. There is surely better, i hardly think there's worse.

Charles S (it) wrote: It's pretty good, but its no veer zharra

alexandra m (fr) wrote: A fatal job of acting that is not limited to merely 1 or 2 actors.

FaeryTaleAngel F (br) wrote: Uh...I don't actually remeber seeing this completely. lol I was VERY young when I saw it.

Todd A (mx) wrote: It meanders at some points and is difficult to take seriously in others, but Cellular at the very least provides enough moments of suspense and fun to make it worth the watch.

Raffy John M (de) wrote: The letters are lovely and very poetic. Every woman who happens to read that would fall in love. It was boring., The letters and thoughts made it beautiful., It is not the best film based on Nicholas Sparks movie.

Erin C (us) wrote: Poor. This could have been told much better.

Bradley W (de) wrote: A genius musical that I always love watching.