Shed No Tears

Shed No Tears

Pål dreams about becoming successful with his music, but he has one major obstacle: himself. He's a diamond in the rough, and the only things greater than his musical talent are his obsessions, which constantly get him into trouble. We follow Pål on an emotional journey one summer in Gothenburg where he is thrown between passion and deceit; love, reconciliation and deliverance.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:119 minutes
  • Release:2013
  • Language:Swedish
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:sea,   traveller,   music gig,  

Pål dreams about success within the musical world, but he has an obstacle; himself. His deep thoughts keeps him end up in trouble. We follow Pål on a emotional inner travel to find his call on the swedish west coast of Gothenburg. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Shed No Tears torrent reviews

Nicki M (mx) wrote: Interesting. Could have done without the immaculate conception (please! It was probably her step father!), but this was nicely filmed and acted. The Amish seeming upbringing and family were something different for this type of film.

Lara D (ru) wrote: A film that is funny for the wrong reasons.

Cody S (au) wrote: Reason to watch this movie was I was told to watch it for its Software idea.There is nothing good about this movie other than the software and cute child actress.

Josh H (de) wrote: I know this movie was made to make viewers connect with the boring, mundane life of a police officer. Unfortunately, it did too good of a job. I never want to see a movie that spends 10 minutes watching someone eat soup. There were many moments in this film where I thought I would die of shear boredom. I was often saying, "kill me now!"

Tj A (mx) wrote: More flashy, but not as cohesive as the first.

Orlok N (br) wrote: Tense East Timor Testament!!

David C (kr) wrote: The people who made this movie know nothing about spiders and possibly did not graduate high school. One character asks out a black woman and, in the 21st century, we are expected to be so impressed by this that we ignore the fact that this movie is reasonably well-made, utter crap.

Kristina W (ru) wrote: Dialog could have been better, but overall not a bad pirate film.

Marcos M (us) wrote: One of the best movies I've ever watched.

Rawballs B (br) wrote: Appears to be a humble-frenzied pic... Stupidity-leaking pic but kids will enjoy the silliness...

Mark C (de) wrote: As long as De Niro keeps making that De Niro face, I'll watch anything he's in.

Pranav K (mx) wrote: Beautiful film that details the stigma of a divorcee for an Indian woman, her struggles and humiliations, and the strength and courage required to fight and conquer. An inspirational film, the movie shows how Smita Patil's character, simply on the basis of her own merits and fortitude, is able to start life again from scratch, begin a career, achieve success and respect, and above all, create her own identity all through her diligence and hard work. Songs have wonderful lyrics. Smita Patil is amazing as is Tina Munim. Rajesh Khanna is also great.

luke v (mx) wrote: this is an ok movie I didn't really like it, its a little to random and a little confusing but its very funny and yeah have some good new characters, but I hate to say it but I wouldn't check It out.

Cole B (ca) wrote: Most films can't give you one 3-dimensional black male character. This film gives you at least 8 of them and allows them to share differing views on a number of important social and political issues while honoring the ways that each of their unique stories has shaped their view of the world. It's not a flawless movie. It just gives us Real people. Real conversations. Real challenge. Which is real rare in Hollywood.

berta a (ag) wrote: one of tthe best war movies made.

Grace C (ru) wrote: Bizarre sci-fi movie that is worth watching.

Silvestre S (au) wrote: While Saw is a Psychological horror film with semi-interesting plot and moments of needless crazy camera movement and too much gore to keep your attention it doesn't fail in one thing which is a great show

Gary C (ag) wrote: I am utterly amazed that only 52% of the 'critics' liked this movie. I just watched it again for the first time in years and still find its high quality to be timeless in nature. Who are these 'critics' and why do they exist?