Sheriff of Tombstone

Sheriff of Tombstone

The mayor has sent for a gunslinger who, though appearing to clean up the town, is really to be the mayor's means of taking the town over. When Roy and Gabby arrive in Tombstone, Roy is mistaken for the gunslinger. Just as Roy is ready to expose the mayor, the real gunslinger shows up.

The mayor has sent for a gunslinger who, though appearing to clean up the town, is really to be the mayor's means of taking the town over. When Roy and Gabby arrive in Tombstone, Roy is ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Sheriff of Tombstone torrent reviews

Howard E (jp) wrote: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,But in ourselves, that we are underlings.William Shakespeare (as spoken by Cassius in Julius Caesar)Based on John Green's best-selling novel of the same name, THE FAULT IN OUR STARS tells the story of two exceptional and highly articulate teenagers, Hazel Grace Lancaster and Augustus Waters, who are dealing with life and death in the aftermath of their respective diseases - hers, Stage 4 thyroid cancer that has left her lungs so damaged that she has to be tethered to an oxygen tank 24/7, and his, bone cancer that took away one of his legs. Like Cassius and Brutus in Julius Caesar, Hazel and Augustus (whose name may be a nod to Caesar) have different views of the future and they try to persuade each other that their vision is the correct one. For Augustus, he sees death as oblivion. He will be forgotten in a flash and life will go on just fine without him. To cope, he gives Death the finger by sticking an unlit cigarette in his mouth. For Hazel, she sees herself as a time bomb that will ultimately destroy everything and everyone around her. Her coping mechanism is to try to be as normal a teenager as possible but not to let anyone get close to her. When they meet at a cancer survivors' support group, they discover that they can do - and can be - even more than they had previously thought or wanted.THE FAULT IN OUR STARS is this generation's LOVE STORY, though far superior to its predecessor. Both films are highly manipulative (in other words, have a box of tissues very near), but FAULT'S two main actors, Shailene Woodley (THE SPECTACULAR NOW) and Ansel Elgort (DIVERGENT, which also stars Woodley) elevate the film from the realm of pure schmaltz (which LOVE STORY is), bringing tremendous honesty and realism to their characters. One gets the sense that they hadn't just memorised the words in the script, they owned the words. In LOVE STORY, Ryan O'Neal owned Oliver's words but the same cannot be said of Ali MacGraw with her character, Jenny. (I recently watched that film again to refresh my memory for writing this review. I can't believe how wooden MacGraw was in that film. I was a horny pre-teen back then and I was in love with her, so what did I know?)Unlike Oliver and Jenny, Hazel and Augustus are very savvy about their diseases, which may either be due to the type of people they are or perhaps it is related to how we as a society relate to cancer these days. At the support group they attend, they and their fellow survivors rattle off their prognoses with complete facility. Compare that to Jenny's situation in LOVE STORY. We don't know her cancer's name and I'm guessing she doesn't know it either. And that whole business where the doctor tells Oliver that Jenny is ill before he tells Jenny would never fly today. That plays into Jenny as a tragic character, though. When her time comes, she simply fades away, Madonna-like (not the singer but the original one), in her hospital bed. Hazel and Augustus, on the other hand, are never stoic; never tragic. They are too in touch with their emotions to let that happen to them.FAULT's screenplay was adapted by Scott Neustadter and Michael H Weber, who also penned THE SPECTACULAR NOW. They give the film an indie feel, which serves both the subject matter and the actors well. As much as I enjoyed the film (perhaps "appreciated" may be the correct word to use here), all is not perfect and there were a few things that irked me. The first was Hazel and Gus' very public kiss inside the Anne Frank House, which the other visitors to the museum watched and clapped. Had I been there, I would have told the kids to take it outside. Making out at a memorial to a dead girl doesn't seem very appropriate. The other was the sappy teen music that pervaded the film. One song, okay. Two, maybe. It was, no doubt, meant to lighten the mood until the next round of tears came along but by the third song it was cloying. (I could also take issue with Francis Lai's Oscar (R) winning score in LOVE STORY, which was just variations on a theme.)All in all, though, FAULT is a well-made film and will probably stand up to time which, unfortunately, LOVE STORY does not. Woodley, once again, delivers a top-notch performance, which is why she is on my list of Actors to Watch. Elgort, for his part, has wonderful screen presence much like Ryan O'Neal had back in the day. I may have to add him to my list too. Laura Dern, too, hits the mark as Hazel's mother, Frannie. Here is a character who probably hasn't had a decent night's sleep since her daughter was first diagnosed, yet she is upbeat and determined to try to give her daughter as normal a life as possible. There's a poignant scene where Frannie reveals to Hazel her plans to "move on" (so to speak) once Hazel passes away. I can't imagine Oliver or Phil (Jenny's father) having the same conversation with Jenny.If you haven't seen LOVE STORY before or if you haven't seen it in 44 years, I would tell you to watch it (again). I think, like me, you'll be wondering what all the fuss what about. As for THE FAULT IN OUR STARS, you should definitely see that film if you haven't done so already. Get the Kleenex ready though.

Arai A (au) wrote: I'm going with two-and-a-half stars for the film, and an additional half star just for Hrithik Roshan, which makes it three out of five for Krrish 3. The film is ambitious but flawed. It is, however, consistently watchable for its terrific lead star who you can't take your eyes off, even for a moment.

Loren R (it) wrote: Eine gut gemachte Endzeit Story, dass sich diesmal auf weiter See abspielt! Die Schauspieler sind gut ausgewhlt. Vor allem Dennis Hopper: Der ist der absolute Brller! Sicher ist die Geschichte nicht Neu, weil es bisschen Mad Max erinnert. Ich finde aber, die Idee auf einem riesigen Ozean zu spielen, eine faszinierende Sache! Auch wenn es Logiklcher und schwache Stellen im Drehbuch gibt, der Film ist Unterhaltend und hat einen ironischen Humor!

John N (jp) wrote: Not great, but entertaining nonetheless. Of course, Max von Sydow is an improvement upon any film in which he partakes.

Anthony V (es) wrote: Okay sequel to Trancers.

Joseph H (ag) wrote: I dont want to watch.

Senor C (nl) wrote: Written by Lloyd Kaufman long before his Troma days. For how much I like some of the schlock that he has made w/ Troma he almost seems better suited to serve up a straight exploitation movie. Lucky in casting to have Corman regular Mary Woronov she gives a grand performance playing both mind & sex games seeking revenge. I was also very happy to see Lynn Lowry from I Drink Your Blood in this. She caught my attention in that (even if her role is uncreditted) & I was happy to see her sugar cookies in this. They should have actually called this Sugar Boobies because it's riddled w/ nudity & lesbianism including vaginal insertion w/ a gun. I have a old Roger's Video review book & they gave this a turkey!...Mainstream critics don't know shit

Chris M (au) wrote: Here are the Stones in their prime, the 1972 US tour, defining the lifestyle of sex, drugs, and rock and roll. The audio quality is poor, the film is disjointed, but it is interesting to compare the Stones here to their almost too polished, contrived personae in Scorcese's "Shine A Light". Give me the 1972 Stones anyday.

Darren H (br) wrote: Crime flicks don't get any cooler than this!

Jayakrishnan R (ru) wrote: 62%Saw this on 26/11/15An average film that had the potential to be far better that what it is. It has some thrills and a few well shot scenes, but it has pacing issues and cannot build up suspense the way films like Bone Collector builds up. Morgan Freeman and Ashley Judd do justice to their roles and Judd is extremely sexy here. It lacks a good villain in the first place and it doesn't carry it's viewers along with it. The film's plus points are a scene where a woman is shown jumping a waterfall, there the cinematography is excellent and many such things. The direction feels slightly immature, it feels as if it's dragging the narrative down. The prologue of the film is great but it holds no relevance to the story. The plot is also improbable and at times full of loopholes, just like the ending.